Telangana High Court
WP/684/2025 of Meka Kavitha Vs The State of Telangana on 7 October 2025
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 684OF 2025 Between: 1. Meka Kavitha, Wo late [Vlohan Reddy, Aged about 50 years Occ
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 684OF 2025
Between:
1. Meka Kavitha, Wo late [Vlohan Reddy, Aged about 50 years Occ house wife
2. Saicharan Reddy, S/o lt/eka Mohan reddy Aged about 29 years Occ. student
3. Likitha, D/o Late [Vleka ltlohan reddy, Aged about 3'1 years Occ. student All are r/o R/o H.No. 4-9-774, Road No 10A, Plot No. 18 Yellareddy colony, Hayathnagar, Yadadri Bhongiri District
...PETITIONERS
AND
The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department secretariat. Hyderabad.
The District collector, Yadadri Bhongiri District.
The Chairman Sub Division Tribunal, under Maintenance and Welfare of pirents and Senior citizens acl 2OO7 Cum Revenue Divisional Officer And Sub Divisional I\Iagistrate Choutuppal Division Yadadri Bhongiri District The Tahasildar, Narayanpur Mandal, Yadadri Bhongiri District Meka fulallamma, Wo late Linga reddy Aged about B0 years. Occ. house wite R/o Bodamarla Gadda, Gujia Post Narayanapur mandal, Yadadrt Bhongrrr district Meka Sudhakar reddy, S/o late Aged about 5o years Occ. agriculture Charlapally, Nalgonda
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in 'the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No 3 in issuing the rmpugned order vrde No. 1222t2023 daled 4.7.2024 under Maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens act 2OO7 directing the petitioner No '1 to
,,r'
.7
pay a amount of Rs 115001 treating the application filed by the respondent No 5
for cancellation of gift deed and cancellation of patta for the land in survey No 7816 extent ac 3.28 gls and in survey No. 7g extent ac 1.27 gts situated at Gulia village, Narayanapur mandal, yadadri Bhongiri district as application filed for maintenance without considering the explanalon filed by the petitroner dated 28.5.2024 and without having jurisdiction as arbitrary and illeoal and contrary to the provisions of the l\/arntenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens act 2007 and in violatron rrf the principles of natural .;ustice consequently to set-aside the same without issurng any notice and following the due process of law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under {lection 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court rnay be pleased to grant stay of all furtherr proceedings issued by the respondent No. 3 vide order No. 122212023 daled 4.7 2024 pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.DAMODAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 4: AGp FOR WOMEN & CHILD WELFARE
FOR GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No. 5 & 6: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR
The Court made the foltowing: ORDER
(
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.6E4 of 2o.25
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri G. Damodar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistalt Government Pleader for Women and Child Welfare appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.S ald 6.
2. Challenging the order dated 04.O7.2024 of respondent No.3, petitioner filed the present writ petition
3. Respondent No.5 is mother-in-law of petitioner No.1 and paternal grandmother of petitioner Nos.2 and 3. Respondent No.5 had filed an application before respondent No.3 seeking maintenance and also to cancel the registered gift settlement deed bearing document No.479 of 2OO7, dated 08.O9.2007. Vide order dated
04. O7.2024, respondent No.3 directed both the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.6 to pay an amount of Rs.2,SOO/-, per month to respondent No.S towards maintenance. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, they have been paying the said amount of Rs.2,500/- to respondent -- \ -^-l
No.5. Respondent No.5 has been receiving the said amount. In proof of the same, he has frled copies of receipts.
4. Learned counsel for respondent No.S would submit that respondent No.5 has been receiving the said amount of Rs.2,500/- Iiom petitioner No.1.
5. It is the apprehension of petitioner No.1 that respondent No.3 may cancel the aforesaid registered gift settlement der:d executed prior to promulgation of the Maintenance etnd Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act,2OO7
6. As discussed supra, in the impugned order dated
04. O7.2024, re spondent No.3 has directed petitioner No.1 arrd responder:Lt No.6 to pay an amount of Rs.2,5OO/- per month to respondent No.5 towards her maintenance. He has not accepted the request made by respondent No.S to cancel the aforesaid registered gift settlement deed. In fact respondent No.5 is aggrieved by the said order of respondent No,3, but not by the petitioners
7. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to respondent No.S to prefer appeal against the order dated 04.07.2024, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, misceilaneous petitions pending, if arry, sha-ll stand closed. . SRINIVASA R Y STANT R RAR //TRUE COPY// E TION OFFICER One CC to SRI G.DAMODAR REDDY, Advocate [O One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUCI Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies To,
BSR BS , I [l
HIGH COURT DATED: 0711012025
ORDER
WP.No.68 4 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS q
3 tl * L s.iAr nli 1l?(r r,f ., 5o