WP/30057/2025 of MS. MALOTHU SHIRISHA Vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA on 7 October 2025

13168I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT (Special Origlnal Jurisdictlon) TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN Between MS. MALOTHU SHIRISHA, D/o. MALOTHU DEVA Aged about 17 years, Occ- Student, Fi/o. Ramachandrapuram Tanda, Mattam Palle Village, Mattampally Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana-508204 Being minor Rep. by her Father Malothu Deva S/o. Malothu Vashya, Aged about 45 years, Occ- Agriculture. PETITIONER AND 1, THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Represented by its Principle Secretary Secretary to Government, Higher Education (T.E) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. THE TELANGANA STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, Rep, by its Secretary, Opp. Mahaveer Hospital, Mahaveer Marg, Masabtank, Hyderabad

- 500 028.

3. THE CONVENER, TG LAWCET Admission- 2025 Osmania University, Hyderabad

4. ANANNTHA l-AW COLLEGE, Rep. by its Principal 3-5-5/2, Sumitra Nagar, Mvekananda Nagar Colony Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500072 ...RESPONDENTS. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ, Memoiandum or Direction; more particularly the Respondents herein more particularly the Respondent No.3 and 4 herein in demanding the Petitioner herein to pay the Tuition Fee of Rs,35,000/- for admission into LL.B 5 years Course, at Respondent No.4 College without considering the Scheme of Post Matric Scholarship for reimbursement of Fee is arbitrary, illegal and malafied and is against to the Principles of Natural Justice in violation of articles 14, 21 and 21-A of Constitution of lndia and consequently Direct the l?espondent Nos.3 to 4 to grant admission into LL.B 5 Years Course as per Joining Report Dated 24.09.2025 issued by Respondent No.2. lA NO: 1OF 202s Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents more particularly Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to grant admission rand permit me to attend the Class as per the Joining Report Dated 24.09.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2 pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAVINDER REDDY MUPPU Counselfor the Respondent No.l: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Gounselfor the Respondent No.2: SRlA"P. SURESH FIAM, SC FOR STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI M SRINIVAS REDDY, SC FOR OSMANIA UNIVERSIW Counsel for the Respondent No.4: .-.. The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITIO N No.30057 of 2025 ORAL OITDIiII.: Mr.Muppu Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. He had filed a memo vide U.S.R.No.l of 2025,dated 08.10.2025 before the Registry to that effect.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closecl. SD/- A. SREENIVASA RE ASSISTANT RE //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER '1. One CC to SRl. RAVINDER REDDY MUPPU, te IoPUC]

2. One CC to SRI A.P. SURESH RAM, SC FOR STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION

3. One CC to SRI M. SRINIVAS REDDY, SC FOR OSMANIA UNIVERSITY

4. Two CCs to GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, High Court for the state of Telangana. [OUTI

5. Two CD Copies PVL To, BM Y*'

HIGH COURT ATED: 7/,1012025 WP.No.30057 ot 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS =i de Xs* tl :l 1rl7 I 1 ? rll * c O D HE '1 ( c * s