Telangana High Court

WP/30380/2025 of Kundali Krishnaiah Vs The State of Telangana on 7 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 30380 oF 202s Between: 1 Kundali Krishnaiah, S/o Ramaiah, H. No. 3-35,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 30380 oF 202s

Between:

Kundali Krishnaiah, S/o Ramaiah, H. No. 3-35, I\ilandipal, Chowdapur Mandal, Vkarabad District, Telangana - 509340.

2. Gandla Yadaiah, S/o Venkataiah H.No. 1-35, Vikarabad District.

Pargi Village and Mandal,

...PETITIONERS

AND

I

The State oj T_elgngana, Represented by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Dr. BR Ambedkar Secretariat, Hyderabad.

The Chief Commissioner of Land Admrnistration Telangana State, Opp.

Annapurna Hotel, Nampally Station Road, Abids, Hyderabad.

The District Collector, Vikarabad Drstrict, Vikarabad.

fhe Revenue Divisional officer, Vikarabad Division, Vikarabad.

The Tahsildar and Joint Sub-Registrar, Doma tVandal, Vikarabad Abdul Khadir, S/o Abdul tMajid, Mothkur Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of tndia praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of [r/andamus declaring the action of the respondents in incorporating the name of respondent No.6 as pattadar in revenue records in Sy. No.114 of Mothkur Village, Doma [Vandal, Vikarabad District as being arbitrary, illegal, unjust and violation of the principles of natural justice and violation of the Article 300-4 of

I

the constitution of lndia, and consequently while deleting the r lme of respondent No.6, direct the respondents to consider Petitioners Bhubha r thi application Nos 2500054400dated03.07.2025and2500053245dated02.()'2O25respectively anri mutate their name in revenue records by issuing Pat rdar passbooks in respect of the land to an extent Ac 2-O3gts and Ac 0-20gts rtally Ac 3-03gts in Sy No. 114/1 situated at fVlothkur village, Doma lVandal Vikar: rad District'

IA NO :1 OF 2O25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in Support of the writ petition, the High Cc;Lt . may be pleased to direct the respondents not to alienate the land to an extent I c'2-03gts and Ac 0- 20gts totally Ac.3-03gts in Sy No' 1 14/1 situated at Mothkur I lage Doma Mandal'

VikarabadDistrictinfavourofthirdparties,pendingdtsprl'alofthemainWrit petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI AKTHARI

Counsel for the Respondents No'1 to 5: SRI L' RAVINDEF '

AGP FOR REVENUI:

Counsel for the ResPondent No'6: -

The Court made the following: ORDER

at

---6aqs*;rt+.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION No.30380 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER:

Hcard learned counsel lor the petitioners and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader fbr Revenue.

2. Petitioners herein are claiming that they are the absolute owners and possessors ol'land adrneasuring Acs.3.03 guntas in Sy.No.114/1, situated at Mothkur Village, Dorna Mandal, Vikarabad District, on the strength of the registered sale deed bearing Nos.3392 and 3393 of20l8, dated 30.07.2018, having purchased the same from their vendor i.e., Sri Potrepally Narsaiah. In proof of the same,, they have filed copies of the said sale deeds and old pattadar passbooks of their vendors. They have submitted online applications bearing Nos.2500054400, dated 03.01.2025 and 2500053245, dated 02.07.2025 with a request to mutate thcir names in respect of the subject propefty and issue pattadar passbooks. Despite receiving and acknorvledging the said online pplications, respondent No.4 did not act upon the same. Aggr eved by the said inaction of rcspondent No.4, pctitioners lilcc the prcscnt w|rI petltlou

3. Lcarned Assistant Governrnent Pleader fbr Levenue, on insh-uctions. rvould subrnit that respondent No.4 r'ill consider ancl dispose ol'the said online applications subrr itted by tlie pctitionels, in ac'cordancc with law, by putting th ' petitioners and all intcrcsted parlies on notice and afforcli rg them an oppoftunlty

4. ln the light of the said subrnission, this W' r Pctition is disposed of dirccting respondent No.4 to considc- and disposc of the aforesaid online applications bearing Nos.l 500054400, datcd 03.07 .2025 and 2500053245, dated 02.01 .2025 submitted by the pctitioners with a request to rutar-e thcir names in respect of the subject property and ir; ue pattadar passbooks, in accordance with law, by putting tlt, pctitioners and all intcrcsted parlies on notice and affordi g thcm an -ffi@Er .'' i''F;'tF' . "-Yz -t opportunity. For any reason, if respondent No'4 is not inclined to accept tlrc request made by thc pctitioncrs' he shall assign specific reasons, pass a rcasonecl orcler and otlmnrunicate copy ol the sarne to the petitioners' Horvever' he shall cornplete the said exercise wittrin sixty (60) days fiom the date of receipt of a copy olthis order. Miscellaneous applications, i1' any pcnding' shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs' D/.L. VIJAYA LAXMI STANT REGISTRAR S //TRUE COPY// The Revenue Divisional officer' Vikarabad Division' karabad

One CC to SRI AKTHARI' Advocate IOPUCI Two CCs to GP for Revenue' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD CoPies ECTION OFFICER To MP B

I I IIIGH COURT DATE ):07110t2025

ORDER

WP.No.:l3380 of 2025 4r$-';::'1' // .; ti '; \., [::tll2[ t P/\T DISPOSING OF THE WIi IT PETITION WITII OUT COSTS )L

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead