Telangana High Court
WP/30132/2025 of Konni Gopal, Vs The State of Telangana, on 6 October 2025
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 30132 OF 2025 Between: Konni Gopal, S/o. Lingaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ
L't
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 30132 OF 2025
Between:
Konni Gopal, S/o. Lingaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ .Agriculture, Rl/o.
Kamepally Vilalge, Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1 . The State of Telangana, Rep- by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalguda Division, Nalgonda District.
4. The Tahsildar, Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda District.
5. Veerelly Bixam Reddy, S/o. Laxma Reddy, Aged about 55 Years, Occ.
Agriculture, Rl/o. Kamepally Village, Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 in issuing the lmpugned Notice through vide No.2500175169, dated . Nil-07-2025
and interfering into the peaceful agriculture operalions of the Petitioner to an extent of Ac.O.s 112 Gts in Survey No.2431311, to an extent of Ac.0.20 Gts in Survey No.243, to an extent ol Ac.2.2O Gts in Survey No.511211, to an extent of Ac.1 .20 Gts in Survey No.24314, to an extent of Ac.0.30 Gts in Survey No.48/1 1, to an extent of Ac.0.36 Gts in Survey No.2431415, totaling to an extent of Ac.6.11112
Gts, which is situated at Kamepally Village, Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda District and trying to transfer the land of the Petitioner on the name of Respondent No.S
and threatening to handover the land to the Respondent No.S and trying to disposes the Petitioner from his Iand is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and set aside the lmpugner No.2500175'169, dated .Nil-O7-2025 and consequently dir(
Nos.3 and 4 not to interfere into the peaceful agricultural (,1
transfer the land to an extent of Ac.6.1 1112 GIs in Surve 7
511211, 24314, 48111 and 2431415, which is situated al Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda District on the name of Resp, to threaten the Petitioner to hand over his land to the Resporr disposes the Petitioner from his land.
\otice through vide
:t the Respondent
e:rations and not to
lxlos 2431311 , 243,
Kamepally Village,
ndent No.5 and not
ont No.5 and not to
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir( rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to interfere into the I eaceful agricultural operations and not to transfer the land to an extent of Ac (. 1'1l2 Gts in Survey Nos. 24313/1 , 243, 511211, 24314, 48111 and 2431415, r rich is situated at Kamepally Village, Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda Distr t on the name of Respondent No.5 and not to threaten the Petitioner to hanrl :ver his land to the Respondent No.5 and not to disposes the Petitioner frc r r his land pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: SRI L.RAVINDER \GP FOR
REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.S: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
v/
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.3O132 of 2O2S
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue.
2. Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.6.l 150 guntas in Sy.Nos.243/31t, 243, St /21 t, 243/4, 48111 and 243/4/5, situated at Karnepally Village, Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda District. He has filed a copy oi latest passbook and title deed. On the representation submitted by respondent No.5 stating thar petitioner is in illegal occupation of Ac.0.2O guntas of lar.rd in Sv.No.51, situated at Kamepally Village, Vemulapalll, Mandal, the Sub_ Collector, Miryalaguda, has isslred norice clated 21.O8.2025 to the petitioner with a request to submrt all the documents within a period ol seven (07) days. petitioner has submitted all the documents on 25.O8.2025 along with the representation/ explanation. Even then, respondent Nos.3 and 4 are trying to interlere u,ith the possession of the petitioner at the instance of respondent No.5 without follou'ing due procedure laid down under lara.. ()hallenging the said action of respondent Nos.3 and 4, p r rtioner filed the present u,rit petition.
3. Whert::ts, learncd Assistant Governmeit l)leadcr lor Rcvcnuc, on iustructions, would submit tlt r the Srrb Collector, Mirlalaguda, will conduct enquirl I rlrsuant to notice , dated 21.08.2025 and also consider thc ,;<planation and documcnts submitted by the petitioner on 15.0g.2025 and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordzrn :: llith lau. by putting the petitioner, respondent N, I and .ll intcrested pirrties on notice and affording them :lrl opltortunitv
4. Lcarned Assistant Govcrnment pleader I r . Reventrc has ltrodr_rced rvritten instructions of responclr r t No.4 r.o the said elfect and the same are placecl on recor.(l
5. lr-r the light of the said discussion, rotrce to respondent No.S is dispensed with. This Wril lt.tition is disposed of dirccting the Sub_Collector, Mirva I, 1Juda, to conduct enquir y, strictly in accordance q,ith thr: ; r.ocedurc. laid doil,n under lau,, pursuant to the notr,,: datecl 2l .O8 .2025, con sidering the explanation and c r c uments submitted by the petitioner on 25-08.2025 and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance r'rri th law by putting the petitioner, respondent No.5 and all interested parties on notice and affording them an oppol'tunit-v. Ho,,r,ever, he shall complete the said exercise rvithin a period of thirt), (3O) days from the date ol receipt ol a copy of this order. Till then, respondent Nos.3 to 5 zrre directed not to interlere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property. Miscellaneous applications, iI anv pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. B.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// The Principal Secretary, Revenue Departmen Secretariai, Hyderabad, State ofTelangana. . The District C6llector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda Di The Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalguda D The Tahsildar, Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda qr^slliq!. one CC to SRI RAPoLU 6HRsxRR, Advocate IOPUC] i*" ccri" ci FoR REVENUE, High court foithe state of relangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies TION OFFICER To
7. PSK. TKS
4q
Secreta uilding, t strict. ivision, Nalgonda District PntC,,,
HIGH COURT DATED:0611012025
ORDER
WP.No.30132 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ft^q. ::: Ft T t R o ? ( o ,9. I * 2r\>\ra I ?D?fr