Telangana High Court
WP/29956/2025 of Smt. Peechara Uma, Vs The State of Telangana on 6 October 2025
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD AT HYDERABAD (SPeciat Originat Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29956 OF 2025 Between: Smt. Peechara Uma, W/o. Late P. Age.67 years,
t 3168I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
AT HYDERABAD
(SPeciat Originat Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 29956 OF 2025
Between:
Smt. Peechara Uma, W/o. Late P.
Age.67 years, Occ. Housewife, Fl/o
Colony, Karimnagar.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal- Secretary, Revenue, Government of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad
2. The Chief Commissioner, Land Administration, CCLA Building, Nampally, Hyderabad.
3. The District Collector, Peddapalli District, Telangana
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli District, Telangana'
5.TheTahsildar,RevenueMandalJulapalli,PeddapalliDistrict,Telangana'
...RESPONDENTS
petition under Article 22o ol lhe Constitution of lndia f r"ying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to may issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the representation submitted on 06.06.2025 vide acknowledgment No. 2004007-0039
and another representation made to '3rd Representation on 18.09.2025 with respect to lands in Sy. No. 1 182 admeasuring Ac' Ac' 2-10 , Sy' No 1 185
admeasuringAc.6.14andSy.No.llg3admeasuringAc.6-12Situatedat Vadkapur Village, Julapalli Revenue Mandal, Peddapalli District as bad, arbitrary'
illegal, and violation of A|t. 300-A of the constitution of lndia and consequently Paoa Rao D/o.Late Pulluri Bheem Rao'
10-4-12018, Thirumala Residency, Bank
direct the respondents to conduct an inquiry at the earliest pc nt of time avoiding delay and be pleased lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ r mstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rray be pleased to direct the Respondents not to entertain, register or effe: any sale deeds, alienations, or mutations in respect of the said lands in Sy. Nrr. '1 182 admeasuring Ac.2-1O, Sy. No. 1185 admeasuring Ac. 6-14 and Sy. No. 11( rl admeasuring Ac.
6-12 situated at Vadkapur Village, Julapalli Revenue Mandal, Peddapalli District, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI C ROHINI SMITHA
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR F EVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
t
I
I
---7
,/
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.29956 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue
2. According to the petitioner, her father, namely, Late Sri Pulluri Bheem Rao was the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.2.l0 guntas ln Sy.No.l182, Acs.6.14 guntas rn Sy.No. I185 and Acs.6.12 guntas in Sy.No. 1193, situated at Vadkapur Village, Julapalli Mandal, Peddapalli District. Her father died on 02.12.2015. After the death of her father, she succeeded the subject property. She has submitted a representation dated 06.06.2025 to respondent No.5 with a request to issue succession and mutation proceedings in respect of the subject property. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representation, respondent No.5 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of, respondent No.5, petitioner hled the present writ petitron.
--a.:, )..'.
3. Though the petitioner is claiming that lL, r father was the absolute owner and possessor ofthe subject pro; erty. she has not hled old pattadar passbook of her father. She hr s filed copies of the pahanies for some years. Though heL lather died on 02.12.2015, she iras subrnitted a representation ,n 06.06.2025 in Revenue Sadassu to respondent No.5. Thus, th :r.e is a delay of l0 years. There is no explanation much lr: s the plausible explanation frorn the petitioner for the said abrr, r.ma[ delay. She has not fumished the details of legal heirs of hi father. It is for lespondent No.5 to consider and dispost of the said representation dated 06.06.2025 subrnitted by t re petitioner, in accordance with law
4. In the light of the said discussion, this ,Vrit petition is disposed of directing respondent No.5 ll consider the representation dated 06.06.2025 subrnitted bv r re petitioner in Revenue Sadassu seeking succession and mutat..rn proccedings and dispose of the sarne, in accordance with l, rv. Respondent No.5 shall consider the aforesaid aspects. For an reason, if he is not inclined to accept the request made by the 1tr: ir.ioner, he shall \ 1t . --'. _-_-, assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order and communicate the copy of the same to the petitioner. However, he shall cornplete the entire exercise within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs SD/. U. SUD ASSISTANT REG R //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue, Government of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, The State of Telangana, Hyderabad
2. The Chief Commissioner, Land Administration, CCLA Building, Nampally, Hyderabad.
3. The District Collector, Peddapalli District, Telangana
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli District, Telangbna.
5. The Tahsildar, Revenue Mandal Julapalli, Peddapalli District, Telangana.
6. One CC to SRl. C ROHINI SMITHA, Advocate [OPUC]
7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. tourl B. Two CD Copies ..-. /( To, PVL TJ
I n HIGH COURT DATED:0611012025
ORDER
WP.No.29956 of 2025 Zio ,! i R ii I ,J * r-l I
ci' r'1 sPAT '-:,' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS It KS 3"ll 2-e /b !t'!6 *