Telangana High Court
WP/30106/2025 of Ummadi Mallavva Vs The Government of Telangana on 6 October 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERJif;S ] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 301 06 0F 2025 Between: AND 1. Ummadi Mallavva, Wo Narsingu, Age 60 years, Occu. House
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERJif;S
]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 301 06 0F 2025
Between:
AND
1. Ummadi Mallavva, Wo Narsingu, Age 60 years, Occu. House wife, Residing in Amdapur Village, Armoor Revenue Mandal, Nizamabad District.
2 Kandela P_eQa 9a.ngg Ra-m, S/o Bojanna, Age 58 years, Occu. Agriculture,
3. Kandela Mallu Bai, Wo China Gangaram, Age 58-years, Occu. Hbuse wife,
4. Potlapalli Gangu, Wo Chinnaiah, Age 62 years, O6cu. House wife, (Petitioner Nos.2 to 4 are residing in Vempalti Village, Mukhtal Revenue Mandal, Nizamabad District.)
5. Sarla Laxmi, Wo Devanna, Age 67 years, Occu. House wife, Residing in Battapur Village, Revenue Man<Jal Erugadal, Nizamabad District.
6. Rauvuthu Gangu, W/o Rajamma, Age 64 years, Occu. House wife, Residing in Thondapur Village, Revenue Mandal Navipet, Nizamabad ?.l.Jri?ia,O*=*a
The Government of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, The District Collector, Jagtial, Jagtial District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Metpalli, Jagtial District.
The Tahsildar, Metpalli, Jagtial District.
Joga Janardhan, S/o Narsaiah (died) Per Lrs Joga Laxmi, Wio late Janardhan, Age 68 years, Joga Naresh, S/o late Janardhan, Age 45 years, Joga Suresh, S/o late Janardhan, Age 40 years, Joga Vanitha, Dio late Janardhan (W/o Sridhar) Age 40 years, Joga Sudha, D/o late Janardhan (Wo Sanjeev) Age 48 years, (The addreises of respondents Nos. 6 to 10 is c/o Janrdhan Cloth Stores, Market Road, Metpalli proper, Jagtial District.)
...RESPONDENTS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
9.
Petition under Atticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction, Writ more specifically in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents Nos. 2 to 4 in not considering the representation submitted to respondent No.2 on 2310612025 regislered as No. JG084/E/2023I00015 on 231OG12025 and sent to the respondent No.4 by initiating action against retpondents Nos. 6 to 10 in resp I :t of claim made by them in Sy.No. 44 measuring 15 guntas and Sy.No. 55S n easuring 14 guntas situate at MetpaIi Revenue viflage of Jagtiar District on t1( basis of fabricated unregistered sale deeds as bad, Arbitrary, illegal, vi: ation of Art.30O_A
Constitution of lndia and to set aside the same conse I tenUy directing the respondents Nos. 1 to 4 to conduct inquiry at the earliest p ,irt of time avoiding delay :
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the :.cumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High cour may be preased to grant prohibitory orders against the respondents Nos. 6 lo 10 restraining from interfering wrth the rights of p.titioner in their possession a r r enjoyment of rand Sy.No.44 measuring 15 guntab and Sy.No.555 measuring . 4 guntas situate at Metpalli Revenue virAge of Jagliar District pending disposar ( r,writ petition.
Counsel for the petitioners: SRI B. NAGESWARA RAO, RE,) By SMT. C. ROHINI SMITHA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S to i 0: __
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
THIi IION'BI,E SR] .I(JSTICE K. I,AKSHMAN
wRI't' PETI't'lON No.30I()6 OF 2025
OITAL ORDIiIT:
Atter arguing [bl sonretiurc Sri B.l'Jageswara Rao, lcanred counscl representing Snrt.C.Rohili Snritha, lcanred counsel for the pctitioners, seeks pennission 01'this Court to i.vithdra',v the present Writ Pctition witlr a liberty tc filc licsh Writ Pctition. lle had made an endorscrnent to the said ell'ect on the bundlc
2.
(iranting liberty as sought firr, this Writ I'}etition is dismissccl as withtlrau'n. ln the circtrmstances ol the case, llle!'e slrall be no order as to costs As a serluel thcreto, nriscellancous pcLitions, il any, pcnding in the Writ Petition sira!l stand closed.
Sd/-M.OSMAN ALI BAIG
S
STANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
J,
CHR
PN,IK
One CC to SMT. C. ROHINI SMITHA Advocate [OPUC]
Two CCs to GPFOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana tourl Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611012025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
W.P.No.30106 of 2025 f 0 5 iir i 21fi ri Iil 'r..1.* \ '-'- DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
9l4Dlw- ...\