Telangana High Court

WP/30106/2025 of Ummadi Mallavva Vs The Government of Telangana on 6 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERJif;S ] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 301 06 0F 2025 Between: AND 1. Ummadi Mallavva, Wo Narsingu, Age 60 years, Occu. House

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERJif;S

]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 301 06 0F 2025

Between:

AND

1. Ummadi Mallavva, Wo Narsingu, Age 60 years, Occu. House wife, Residing in Amdapur Village, Armoor Revenue Mandal, Nizamabad District.

2 Kandela P_eQa 9a.ngg Ra-m, S/o Bojanna, Age 58 years, Occu. Agriculture,

3. Kandela Mallu Bai, Wo China Gangaram, Age 58-years, Occu. Hbuse wife,

4. Potlapalli Gangu, Wo Chinnaiah, Age 62 years, O6cu. House wife, (Petitioner Nos.2 to 4 are residing in Vempalti Village, Mukhtal Revenue Mandal, Nizamabad District.)

5. Sarla Laxmi, Wo Devanna, Age 67 years, Occu. House wife, Residing in Battapur Village, Revenue Man<Jal Erugadal, Nizamabad District.

6. Rauvuthu Gangu, W/o Rajamma, Age 64 years, Occu. House wife, Residing in Thondapur Village, Revenue Mandal Navipet, Nizamabad ?.l.Jri?ia,O*=*a

The Government of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, The District Collector, Jagtial, Jagtial District.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Metpalli, Jagtial District.

The Tahsildar, Metpalli, Jagtial District.

Joga Janardhan, S/o Narsaiah (died) Per Lrs Joga Laxmi, Wio late Janardhan, Age 68 years, Joga Naresh, S/o late Janardhan, Age 45 years, Joga Suresh, S/o late Janardhan, Age 40 years, Joga Vanitha, Dio late Janardhan (W/o Sridhar) Age 40 years, Joga Sudha, D/o late Janardhan (Wo Sanjeev) Age 48 years, (The addreises of respondents Nos. 6 to 10 is c/o Janrdhan Cloth Stores, Market Road, Metpalli proper, Jagtial District.)

...RESPONDENTS

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

9.

Petition under Atticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction, Writ more specifically in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents Nos. 2 to 4 in not considering the representation submitted to respondent No.2 on 2310612025 regislered as No. JG084/E/2023I00015 on 231OG12025 and sent to the respondent No.4 by initiating action against retpondents Nos. 6 to 10 in resp I :t of claim made by them in Sy.No. 44 measuring 15 guntas and Sy.No. 55S n easuring 14 guntas situate at MetpaIi Revenue viflage of Jagtiar District on t1( basis of fabricated unregistered sale deeds as bad, Arbitrary, illegal, vi: ation of Art.30O_A

Constitution of lndia and to set aside the same conse I tenUy directing the respondents Nos. 1 to 4 to conduct inquiry at the earliest p ,irt of time avoiding delay :

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the :.cumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High cour may be preased to grant prohibitory orders against the respondents Nos. 6 lo 10 restraining from interfering wrth the rights of p.titioner in their possession a r r enjoyment of rand Sy.No.44 measuring 15 guntab and Sy.No.555 measuring . 4 guntas situate at Metpalli Revenue virAge of Jagliar District pending disposar ( r,writ petition.

Counsel for the petitioners: SRI B. NAGESWARA RAO, RE,) By SMT. C. ROHINI SMITHA

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S to i 0: __

The Court made the following: ORDER

\

THIi IION'BI,E SR] .I(JSTICE K. I,AKSHMAN

wRI't' PETI't'lON No.30I()6 OF 2025

OITAL ORDIiIT:

Atter arguing [bl sonretiurc Sri B.l'Jageswara Rao, lcanred counscl representing Snrt.C.Rohili Snritha, lcanred counsel for the pctitioners, seeks pennission 01'this Court to i.vithdra',v the present Writ Pctition witlr a liberty tc filc licsh Writ Pctition. lle had made an endorscrnent to the said ell'ect on the bundlc

2.

(iranting liberty as sought firr, this Writ I'}etition is dismissccl as withtlrau'n. ln the circtrmstances ol the case, llle!'e slrall be no order as to costs As a serluel thcreto, nriscellancous pcLitions, il any, pcnding in the Writ Petition sira!l stand closed.

Sd/-M.OSMAN ALI BAIG

S

STANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

To,

J,

CHR

PN,IK

One CC to SMT. C. ROHINI SMITHA Advocate [OPUC]

Two CCs to GPFOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana tourl Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:0611012025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

W.P.No.30106 of 2025 f 0 5 iir i 21fi ri Iil 'r..1.* \ '-'- DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

9l4Dlw- ...\

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead