Telangana High Court
WP/29893/2025 of Syed Ziauddin Vs The State of Telangana on 6 October 2025
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) N4ONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESEI.IT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN Between: Syed Ziauddin, S/o Syed Usman, Aged about 65 years, R/o Masjid Street, Vemsoor Village and
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
N4ONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESEI.IT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Between:
Syed Ziauddin, S/o Syed Usman, Aged about 65 years, R/o Masjid Street, Vemsoor Village and ltrlandal, Khammam District, Telangana - 507164.
...PETITIONER
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500063
The District Collector, Khammam District, Khammam.
The Joint Collector, Khammam District, Khammam.
The Tahsildar, Vemsoor Mandal, Vemsoor, Khammain District.
...RESPONDENTS
WRIT PETITION NO: 29893 OF 2025
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent authorities in restoring and demarcating a proper pathway for ingress and egress to the petitioner's agricultural land in Survey No. 1856/1 98, Vemsoor Village and Mandal, Khammam District, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 21 , and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith restore a permanent pathway for access to the said land, enabling the petitioner to carry out agricultural activities without obstruction.
lA NO: 1 oF 2025
Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith restore a permanent pathway for access to the said land, enabling the petitioner to carry out agricultural activities without obstruction.
c o u n s e I f o r t h e P e t i t i o, "', :Il.l S.T+.?itffi ,t _: ?"^iV; il Counsel for the Respondents : SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
/,
/
THE HON'BLE SRI JUS'IICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.29893 of 2025
Heard Mr..l. Prabhakar, leamed Senior Counsel representing Srnt.Kanurtruri Kalyani, Iearned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learncd Assistant Government Pleader lbr Revenue.
2.
According to the petitioner, there is a pathway on the nofthem side of the petitioncr''s propefty i.e.,, land adrneasuring Acs.3.00 guntas in Sy.No. 185(r/198, situated at Vemsoor Village and Mandal, Kharnrnam District. R&B authorities have laid a road and in view of the sarne, petitioner is not having any access to go to thc said land. To prove that l.rc is the absolute owner and possessor of the sub-iect propcrty, petitioner Iiled the copies ol'
the latest pattadar passbook and title deed. He has submitted representations dated 06.07.2024 and 08.07.2025 to respondent No.4 with a request to provide access to the petitioner's land.
Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representations, respondent No.4 did not act upon tl'tc sarne. Aggrieved by the I
-7,'
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
I I I
I said inactiorr oI rcspondcnt No.4, petitioncr fllecl the prcsent writ petlt l on.
3. As discussed .supra, lhough petitioner is corrtending tltat thcre is a pathway in the Village Map, he has not l'iled the said Village Map. I1e lras filed only photographs. fhough the petitioner is contending that R&B authoritics have laid road, lre has not rnacle R&B authorities as parties to thc prcscnl u,rit petition. However, having received the said representa tions, respondent No.4 should have consider-cd the samt', instead of kceping the samc pending.
4. ln the light of the sarne, this Writ Petition is disposcd of directing respondent No.4 to consider thc rcprcsent;itions datcd 06.07.2024 and 08.07.2025 submitted by thc pctitioner, strictly in accordance with law, by putting the petitiorr,:r ancl all intercsted parties ol1 notice and aflbrding theur un ()pporlunity. Respondent No.4 strall also consider the contcntion ol the petitioner that in the Village Map there is a pratlllysl'. 1; respondent No.4 is not inclined to accept the request rrade b1.the pctitioner, hc shall assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order and communicate the copy of the same to the petitioner. , However, he shall complete the entire.exercise within four (4) weeks from the date of reccipt ola copy olrhis order. Misceilaneous apprications, if any pending, shail stand closed. There shall be no order as to cosfs SD/. M. JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER '1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, State of Telangana, Hyderabad - 500063
2. The District Collector, Khammam District, Khammam.
3. The Joint Collector, Khammam District, Khammam.
4. The Tahsildar, , Vemsoor Mandal, Vemsoor, Khammam District.
5. One CC to SMT.KANUMURI KALYANI, Advocate. [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, Hiqh Court for the State of Telangana. lourl ' /
7. Two CD Copies. 0 esr BS To,
\
't HIGH COURT KL,J DATED:0611012025 C*
ORDER
WP.No.29893 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o (J 17 0[T 2[6 * * t 7;