WP/30122/2025 of Yakari Yadaiah Vs The State of Telangana on 6 October 2025

I

[ 3168']

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

IVONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 30122 OF 2o2s

Between:

Yakari Yadaiah, s/o Yakari Pentaiah, Aged about 51 Years, Occ. Agriculture, PJo- 6-77, Bomman Kunta Suithanpur, Pantacheru Mandal, I\rledak

...PETITIONER

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat. Hyderabad.

The District Collector, Sangareddy District, Telangana.

The Revenue Division Officer, Division, Sangareddy District Telangana The Tahsildar, Ameenpur l\/andal, Sangareddy District, Telangana

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased .' :. to issue a Writ, order, or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ Of Mandamus or any other writ to declare the action of Respondent in not considering the online application vide Transaction lD

19T060200091026 dated 16-07-202s and representation dated 0B-o7-202s of the petitioner for lssuing Pattadar passbook to the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, violating Article 14, 21 of the constitution of lndia, against the principles of natural justice and direct the respondent to consider the online application vide Transactron lD 19T060200091026 dated 16-07-2025 and the representation dated 08-07-2025 of the petitioner for lssue pattadar passbook to the petitioners with following the provisions of the Telangana pattadar passbook Act

G

lA NO: 1 OF 202s

Petition unde:r Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filec jn support of the petition, the High Courl may be plea'sed pleased to direct the respondent to consider the online application vide Transaction lD 1 9--060200091026 dated 16-07-2025 and the representation dated 08-07-2025 o. the petitioner for lssue Pattadar passbook to the petitioners with following the provisions of the Telangana Pattadar Passbook Act.

Counsel for the Peti :ioner : SRI KRISHNA BATHULA

Counsel for the Resgrondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the 'ollowing: ORDER

.IFI I.] tION'I]LE SITI .I T]STICE K. I-AKSH i\IAN

OR.\I, ORDER

l{eard learned counsel for the petitioner ancl Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemmcnt Plcader lirr Re vcrt rrc.

2.

According to the petitioner, he is thc absolute owrrcl and possessor ol land admeasuring Acs.4. l0 guntas in Sy.No.3O, situated at Sulthanpur Village. Patancheru Mandal, Sanuarcddy District, on the strength of Final Patta Certificatc. clated No. l9-1060200091026, dated 16.07.2025 with a rcquest to rurcntion his nanre in Bhu Bharati Portal in rcspect o1'the sub-ject property and issue e-pattadar passbook. Despite receiving ancl acknowlcdsing the said online application, rcspondcnt Nos.) and 3 did not act upon the sarne. Aggrieved by the said inaction ol respondent Nos.2 and 3, petitioner filed the present writ pr.tition.

3.

As discussed .srpra, though the petitioner is clairning right over the sut)ject propelly lrasing on the Final patta Certillcale.

./

WRI'I' PETITION No.30122 of 2025

23.0(r.t995. He has subrlritted online application bearing lD

dated 23.0(r.1995 olrcspondent No.3, he has not filcd any other docurnenl inclutling old pattadar passbook. Hc has filed copy ol

4.

Lcamerl A ssistant Government Plcader lor Revcnue, on instructions, rvould submit that the subject propcrty is in Ameenpur Mandrrl, the provisions oI tl-re Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record ol'Right; in Lands) Rules, 2025 (for shor1, 'tlie Rules, 2025') are not aplrlicable

5.

In the li.elrt ol- the said subrnission, it is relevant to note that Section 3 of thc 'felangana Bhu Bharati (Record rrl Rights in Land) Act,2()25 deals with Act not to apply in certain cases and sub-scction 7 r1'Scction 3 olthe Act,2025 says rrothing in this Act shall apllly to tron-agricultural land in urbatl areas as may be notilled bv the Govelrnlent. Admittcdly, tlre subject propcrty is not rrotilicd by thc Government as L)l now.

Tlrereforc, the pro, isions of tlte Act, 2025 and the 1'eliLngana Rights in Land rrnd Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020 at'e tlot applicablc.

the Final Patta C ertiflcatc.

l

\

I

6. Adminedly, the subject properly is in Atnmenpur Municipality. Ilowever, it is lbr respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the said aspscts while disposing of the aibresaid online application submitted by the pctitioner.

7.

In the light ol' the said tlisoussion, this Writ Petition is clisposccl of dirccling respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider and disposc of the online application bearing ID

No. 19T06020009 1026, dated 16.07.2025, strictly in accordance r.vith law. They shall consider the tacts that the said property is in Ameenpur Municipality, rvhich is an urban area and the subject prope(y is not an agricuhural land. Thcre is an abnonnal detay on the part o1' thc pctitioner in subrnitting the aloresaid onlinc application. On consideration of'the aforesaid facts, if respondent Nos.2 and 3 are not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, they shall assign specilic reasons, pass a reasonecl order and cornrnunicate the copy of the same to the petitioner.

However, they shall cornprete trre cntire exercise within sixty

(60) days lionr the date o[receipt ofa copy ofthis order.

I

=---'------_-

Misct'llancous applications, il any pending, shall stand closcd. -['ltcrc slrall bc no ordcr as to costs.

RINIVASA REDDY

ANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, The State of Telangana, l- yderabad.

2. The District C ollector, Sangareddy District, Telangana.

3. The Revenue Division Officer, Division, Sangareddy District Telangana

4. The Tahsildar, Ameenpur Mandal, Sangareddy District. Telangana

5. One CC to SRI KRISHNA BATHULA, Advocate [OPUC]

6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Slate of Telangana.

touTl

7. Two CD Copies

PVL

GJP

I

I

/

v

HIGH COURT

DATED:061102025