WP/29977/2025 of Eslavath Sunitha Vs The State of Telangana on 6 October 2025

[ 3168 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION

O:29977 OF 2025

Between:

AND

fs_fgvath Sunitha, W/o Srinivasulu, Aged 32 years, occ. House wife, R/o.

H.No.12-239, Plot No. 47, Sai Nag-ar Colohy, Meerpet, Saroor Nagar, Hyderabad

...PETtTIONER

The State of Telangana, rep by Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariate, Hyderabad.

The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, Hyderabad.

The Tahsildar, Maheswaram, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed thdrewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass in order or direction or writ in the nature of Mandamus duly declaring the interference of the 4th respondent with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners' property by putting a sign board showing it as Government land vide property an Extent of Acers 2.00 Guntas situated in Sy Numbers 71t1}l2l1t2t1t1t1t1t1t1t2t1, (Ex. 1.10 Acs) and, 71l1ul2t1t2t1t1t11111l 11212, (Ex.0.30 Acs), situated at Makhal Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice apart from the being against the rights conferred under Article 300(A) of Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the respondents to remove the said sign board forthwith and not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the above property in the interest of justice

lA NO: 1 OF:2025

Petitiott under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit f iled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the reslrondents to remove the said sign board forthwith and not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property an Extent of Acers 2.00 Guntas r;ituated in Sy Numbers 71l1ut2l1l2t 111t1t1t1t 1t2t 1, (Ex. 1.10 Acs)

71l1ul2l1l2l1i1l1l1l1l1l2l2, ('Ex.0.30 Acs), situated at Makhat Vilaje, Maheshwararn lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the interest of justice counsel for the Petitioner : SRI p RAMA SHARANA SHARMA

Gounsel for the Respondents: sRt L. RAVINDER, AGp FoR REVENUE

The Court made the foilowing: ORDER

.

:

,i

-",dru;i*,i;#

,/

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE K. LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION No.29977 of 2025

ORAL

RDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

2.

Petitioner is claiming that she is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Acs.2.00 guntas 1n Sy.Nos.7 I llu/21 I l2l t I I I I I U I I I l2l I and 7 I llul2l I l2l I I I N I I I I L 1212, situated at Makhal Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. [n proof of the same, she has filed the copies of the latest pattadai passbook and title deed. She has been in possession of the subject property. Even then respondent No.4 is trying to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property and \

also trying to dispossess her without following the due procedure laid down under law. Respondent No.4 came to the subject property on 03.08.2025 and erected a board stating that the subject property belongs to the Government. Aggrieved by the said action of respondent No.4, petitioner filed the present writ petition i \

t.

\

\

3.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instnrctions, would submit that the subject property is ceiling land'

Howrtver, respondent No.4 will follow the due procedure laid down unde: law before taking any action against the petitioner herein'

4.

In the latest pattadar passbook and title deed, the subject propr:rty is mentioned as patta tand. Therefore, respondent No.4

has t,: consider the said aspects-

5.

In the light of the sarne, this writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 not to dispossess the petitioner from the subjcct property without following the due procedure laid down under law Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand clost:d. There shall be no order as to costs 5Dl-P.

S

/TRUE COPY/

SECTION OFFICER

ThePrincipalsecretary(Revenue),secretariate,TheStateofTelangana'

HYderabad'

2. The District Collector' Ranga Reddy District' Hyderabad

3.TheF{evenueDivisionalofficer,KandukurDivision,Hyderabad.

4. The l-ahsildar, tt/aheswaram' Ranga Reddy District' Hyderabad'

5.oneoCtoSRl.PRAMASHARANASHARIVIA,AdvocateIoPUC]

6.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana lourl

7. Two CD CoPies

c. SULEKHA DEVI

t

iaur REGISTRAR /

't

To,

\P

PVL

BS

i

i

t

\

I

I

/

/y'

HIGH COURT

DATED:06/1 012025