Telangana High Court

WP/29825/2025 of Sri Bellure Madan Rao Vs The State of Telangana on 26 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K,LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29825 OF 202s Between: AND 1 2 4 Sn Bellure lt4adan Rao,

I s168 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT .

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K,LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 29825 OF 202s

Between:

AND

Sn Bellure lt4adan Rao, S/o. Ram Rao, Aged about 68 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Yenka Village, Utnoor [vlandal, Utnooi Division, Adilabad District"

...PETITIONER

Ihe_S_tatg of Telang_ana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Dr. BR. Ambedkar Bhavan. Secretariat, Hyderabad The Sub-Divisional lVlagistrate and Sub-Collector, Utnoor, Adilabad District.

The Tahsildar, Utnoor [VIandal, Adilabad District.

9angineni Prabhakar, S/o. Not Known, Aged Major, Occ Agriculture, R/o.

Yenka Village, Utnoor Mandal, Utnoor Division, Adilebad Districl_

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndra praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, order or direction more particularly one Writ of fMandamus, to declare the action of the respondents No.2 and 3 in trying to interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's agricultural land in Sy.No. 671111, 6712 to an extent of Ac.8-20 gts and Ac.05-00 respectively, situated at Yenka Village, Utnoor lrlandal, Adilabad District and trying to damage the standing cotton crop without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Article 300-4 of constitution of lndia, in violation of principles of natural justice and against all settled principles of law and consequenfly to direct the Respondents not to interfere and not to dispossess the petitioner's agricultural land in Sy.No.671111, 6712 to an extent of Ac.8-20 gts and Ac.05-00 respectively, situated at Yenka Village, Utnoor Mandal, Adilabad District lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r:i cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court n z y be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere and not to dispossess the t etitioner's agricultural land in Sy.No- 671111, 6712 to an extent of Ac.8-20 gts and rc.05-00 respectively, situated at Yenka Village, Utnoor Mandal, Adilabad Distrir; pending disposal of main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI AKKAM ESHWAR

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: AGP FOR REVEI{ JE

Counsel for the Respondent No. 4 : --

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION No.2982 5 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER:

Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistanl. Governmcnt Pleader for Revenue

2. Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Acs.8.20 guntas in Sy.No.67ll/1 and Acs.5.00 guntas in Sy.No.67l2, situated at Yenka Village, Utnoor Mandal, Adilabad District. It is tiis ancestral propefty. ln proof of the same, he has filed copies of the latest pattadal passbook and title deed. Basing on the conrplaint datcd I 9.01 .2025 submittcd by respondent No.4 and others stating that the petitioner is obstructing the passage to their agricultural tields through pathway, respondent No.2 issued a notice dated 16.09.2025 to the petitioner directing him to appear before hirr.r on 19.09.2025.

3. It is the specitic contention of the petitioner herein that he has appeared be{bre respondcnt No.2 and informed him about the existence of the old pathway since tnar y years and petitioner-, respondent No.4 and fartners are usi I ; the sarne. Even thcn respondeut No.3 is interfering with tlr, possession of the petitioller over thc subject propelty witho Lt following the due procedure laid down uuder law. Challent ing the said action of respondent No.3, petitioner filed the lresent writ petttton.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for (evenue, on instructions, would submit that rcspondent No.2 r 'ill consider the subrnissious made by thc petitioner atld pass appropriatc orders, strictly itt accordance with [aw, bv prutting tl.rc petitioner, rcspondent No.4 and alI interestcd parl ]s ol1 nottce and affording thetn an opportunity.

5. In the Iight of the said submission. notice .r respondent No.4 is dispensed with. This Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider the afore ;aid aspects and dispose olthe matter pursuant to notice datel 16.09.2025, strictly in accordance with law, by putting tlr: petitioner, II I t

;,

To, PVL TKS dL respondent No.4 and all interested parties on notice and affording them an opportunity. Till then, respondent Nos'2 and 3 are directed not to interferc with the possession of the petitioner ovel the subject property Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no ordel as to costs' SD/- M.JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Dr. BR. Ambedkar Bhavan, Secretariat, The State of Telangana, Hyderabad

2. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate and Sub-Collector, Utnoor, Adilabad District.

3. The Tahsildar, Utnoor Mandal, Adilabad District.

4. One CC to SRl. AKKAtvl ESHWAR, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. tourl

6. Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT DATED:2610912025 ,/:, i L .:L\ , .] -.-a,:---.r=-- . gA'(l-ii S;; , l\- 2 d 169 115

ORDER

* ,]ATCH( WP.No.29825 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION * * 'lr x)* WITHOUT COSTS )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead