WP/29982/2025 of Singidi Geetha Vs The State of Telangana on 26 September 2025

Between:

1. Singidi Geetha, W/o Venkat Reddy, Aged 33 years, occ- House wife, Fl/o.

H.No.1-3211 , [V1ain Street, Noorullapur, Bantwaram, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Singidi Venkat Reddy, S/o Lakshma Reddy, Aged 35 years, occ- Profession, Rl/o. H.No.1-3211 , Main Street, Noorullapur, Bantwaram, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

'

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 29982 OF 202s

...PETITIONERS

AND

The State of Telangana, rep by Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariate, Hyderabad.

The District Collector, Ranga Reddy Distnct, Hyderabad.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, Hyderabad.

The Tahsildar, l\,4aheswaram, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or writ rn the nature of Mandamus duly declaring the interference of the 4th respondent with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners property by putting a sign board showing it as Government land vide property an Extent of Acers Extent of A ers 2-20 Guntas situated in (1) Sy No. 71l1ul2l1l2l112, (Ex. Acs.0.25 Gts), (2) Sy. No.

71l1ul1l2l2l1l1l112, (Ex. Acs 0.25 Gts), (3) Sy. No. 71l1ul2l1l2l1l1l1l1l112, and ( )Sy. No. 71l1ul2l1l2l1l1l112, (Ex. Ac.0.25 Gunt), situated at Makhal Village, Maheshwaram [V1andal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and Against the

I

I

t

principles of natural justice apart from the being against the rights conferred under Article 300(A) of constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the respondents to remove the said sign board forthwith and not to interfere with the peaceful possession and en.loyment of the above property in the interest of justice.

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to remove the said sign board forthwith and not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property an Extent of Acers Extent of Acers 2.20 Guntas situated in (1)Sy No. 7111 u/ 2l1l2l1l 2, (Ex.

Acs.0.25 Gts), (2) Sy. No. 71l1ul1l2l2l11111l 2, (Ex. Acs 0.25 Gts), (3) Sy. No.

71l1ul2l1l2l1t1l1l1l112, and (4)Sy No.71l1ul2l1l211l1l112, (Ex. Ac.0.25 Gunt), situated at Makhal Village, Maheshwaram [Vlandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L RVINDER AGP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following: ORDER

TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICT] K. LAKSIIMAN

WRIT PE'l'11'lON No.29982 of 2025

ORAI, O!I.DE,II:

ileard learned counsel tbr the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravindcr, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader lor Revenue appearing lbr the respondents.

The Petitioners herein are claiming that they are thc absolute owners and possessors of the lands admeasuring Ac.2.20 Guntas situated in (1) Sy No. 7l11u/2/l/2lll2. (F.x. Acs.0.25 Gts)' (2) Sv.

No. Tlllulll2l2llllll12, lEx. Acs 0.25 Gts), (r) Sv. No'

llllulLlll2llllllllll12, and (4)Sy. No. 7ti lu/2i I l2llltlt12, (F'x'

Ac.0.25 Gunt), situated at Makhal Vitlage, Maheshwararn Mandal'

Ranga Reddy District. In proot'ol'thc sarnc, they have tiled copies ol the latest passbooks and titlc cleecls- 'lhe glicvancc o1' thc petitioners is that 4tr' respondent has erected a board in tlre subject propefty stating that it is government land without fbllowing due process of law. Challenging the saicl action, the petitioners filed the present writ Petition.

I

I

I

I

-t

To,

3.

Whcreas, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revcnue, on instructions, would submit that respondent Nos.2 to 4

will lbllow the due procedure laid down under law before taking any actiorr fl.r.lainst tlte pctitioners.

4.

Perr-rsal ot'record woutd r-eveal that the 4tl' respondent has erccted a board stating the said land is a govemment land and action rvill be taken against the encroachers. Therefore, 4th tespondent is dirccted to remove the said board forthwith. 4th rcspontlcnt is lurther directed to follow due procedure of law, bclbrc taking action, ifany, against the petitioner.

-s. In lhc lighl of thc same, this Writ Petition is disposed o1, Therc shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel. miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand c loscd.

SD/.M. OSMAN ALI BAIG

A SISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariate, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, Hyderabad.

4. The Tahsildar, Maheswaram, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad,

5. One CC to SRI P RAIVA SHARANA SHARMA Advocate tOpUCl ,_------"-l

Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

Two CD Copies

<C

DAN

BS

I

(

|\

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610912025

0 5 r[8 202[

\

\

-IHE S T4

t