Telangana High Court
WP/28676/2025 of Gnanavelu Chandirareddy Vs The State of Telangana on 26 September 2025
Gnanavelu Chandirareddy, S/o. Chandirareddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Owner of Black jaggery stock, Rl/o. Reddiyar vattam, J-ayapuram, Tirupaturm Paniyandapalli, Vellore, Tamilnadu state. ...PETITIONER HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE
t 3168 i
Gnanavelu Chandirareddy, S/o. Chandirareddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Owner of Black jaggery stock, Rl/o. Reddiyar vattam, J-ayapuram, Tirupaturm Paniyandapalli, Vellore, Tamilnadu state.
...PETITIONER
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF SEPTENNBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO:28676 OF 2025
Between:
ANO
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary' Prohibition and Excise Department, Secetariate, Hyderabad.
The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, at Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.
3. The Station House Officer, Wadapally Police Station, Nalgonda District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the in action of the 2nd respondent to release the Petitioner's black jaggery stock i.e. 21 0 bags of black iaggery (each bag contains around 49 kgs) total 10,2901- kgs of black jaggery value of worth Rs.
1,00,290/- seized in connection with Crime No. 14812O25 daled. 2710512025, on the file of the SHO, Wadapally Police Station, Nalgonda District' U/S.34(e) of TS
Excise Act, 1968 seized of my stock was being illegal, arbitrary and unjust also Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to release of the stock to the petitioner forthwith.
lA NO: 1 OF 2O25
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the c| crmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High courr may be pteased to direct the 2nd respondent to rerease the petitioners black ,,lgery stock i.e. 210
bags of black jaggery (each bag contains around 49 kgs) totat 10,2901 kgs of black jaggery value of worth Rs. 1,OO,2gO/- seized in connr(:tion with Crime No.
14812025 dated. 2710512025, on the fite of the sHo, wac rpaily potice station, Nalgonda District, u/s 3a(e) of rS Excise Act, 1968 seized of my stock, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI LAXMAIAH KANCHANI
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR PROHIBITION & E)tClSE
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABL!] SITI JUSI'ICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.2867 6of 2025
ORDEIT
[[card learned counscl fbr the petitioner and learned (iovemntcttt Plcacler lor Protribition and Excise appearlng on beha l t' o 1' rcspondent Nos' I and 2
2.
'l his r'vrit petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.i irr seizins 210 bags olblack Jaggery' as illegal'
l.
the petitioner herein is ctaiming that he is the owncr of thc afbtesaitl btack jaggcly bags' The sanre were seized on 27'05'2025
in corrncction with Crime No l48 of 2025' pending betbre thc Wadapally Police Station, Nalgonda District' i'e'' respondent No'3'
Thc allcgations levelled against the petitioner is tl.rat he was transporting ttre said black Jaggery for the purposc ol rnartulacturing I D.liquor.
4.
'l'here is no dispute that the petitioner is the owner of thc goocls seizccl on2'7.05'2025 ln proof of the same' he has flled bills'
5.
Adrnittcdly, the seized rnaterial is ja1:r.,:ry, which is a perishable eood. -fherelore. retaining the I, r jd material with rcspondent No.l will nof scrvc any purpose
6.
Accordin-q to both the lealncd counsel fo the petitioner and learned Govcrnrncnt Plcader lor Prohibition and [rxcisc. the cost of the said goods is Rs .1. I l,(r00/-.
7.
In thc light of thc alorcsaid discussion, rr: wr.it petition is disposcd o1, dirccting responcle nt No.3 to r€1. ase the afbrcsaid goods to tll: pctitioner upon the petitioner fur r;hing a pcrsonal bond for a sunr o1'I{s.2,00,000/- and bank gua,rntee fbr the said amount.
Misccllaneor.rs applications, if any pcn,1ing, shalI stand closed S /.A. SRINIVASA REDDY
iSISTANT REGISTRAR
/iTRUE COPY//
To
'1SECTION OFFICER
1 . The Principal Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Depailr. ent, Secetariat, State of Telangana, HYderabad.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, 't Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.
TheStationHouseOfficer,WadapallyPoliceStation,'lalgondaDistrict'
One CC to SRI LAXMAIAH KANCHANI, Advocate. [ODtJC]
Two CCs to GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE, High -:'rurt for the State of Telangana. [OLIT]
Two CD Copies.
BSK
BS
E
-l
HIGH COURT
DATED:2610912025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.28676 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I ./ ,1, i: lril[-'-\r ,.i. \... ,.i' 1, [[T 2ffi i: i' ..:,. \.:i\.. t . ..: a' ,t' ,/ //4 ,/zo4