WP/29680/2025 of Mallepalli Shankaramma Vs The State of Telangana on 26 September 2025

1. The Sfate of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Dr.B.RAmbedkar Secretariat, Khairatabarj, Hyderabad T.S

2. .The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Rangy Reddy District at Kongatak-tan -S0i510

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukuru Division, Rangy Reddy District - s01359

4. The Tahsildar, lVlaheshwaram [Vlandal, Ranga Reddy District -509325.

5. thintoju Srinivas Chary, S/o: Ch Anjaneyutu, R/o H.No.1-1, pendyal Villaqe Kalwakol Post - Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 509325. "

6. Ailla Narsimha Goud, S/o: Ailla Narayana, Rt/o H.No.1-38, pendyal Village Kalwakol Post - Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - -SOSSZS] ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the Petitioner Representation dated OB-09-202S, for illegal interference by unofficial Respondents No.5 and 6 and their henchmen, who are trying to dislrossess the Petitioner from her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitionr:r part of Ac.10-141/2 Guntas, of the said Agricultural lands bearing Sy.No.1 58 admeasuring to an extent ol Ac.3.71t2 Guntas in total extent of Ac.6-1 5 Gts., and Sy.No.161 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.7.07 Guntas out of total extent of Ac.14-14 Gts., i.e., Ac.1O-141t2 Guntas, out of total extent of Ac.2O-29 Guntas situated at Pendyal Village, [\ilaheshwaram lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District,T.S., having acquired the same by virtue of inheritance from Petitioner father late llhayini Ram Reddy Sio Late Shayini Venkat Reddy from their forefathers, riespite having made Representation dated 08-09-2025, to not to dispossess or vacate the Petitioner from her Agriculture lands, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional is clear violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14,19 and 2'! of Constitution of lndia and in violative of principles of rratural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the Representation dated 08-09-2025 to not to interfere, to not to dispossess or vacate the Petitioner from her peaceful possession and enjoyment' of Agriculture lands, by unofficial Respondents No.5 and 6 and their henchmen, in respect of Petitioner part of Ac.1O-14112 Guntas, of the said Agricultural lands bearing Sy.No.'158 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.3.71t2 Guntas in total extent of Ac.6-15 Gts., and Sy.No.161 admeasuring to an extent ol Ac.7.07 Guntas out of total extent ot \c.14-14 Gts., i.e., Ac.10-14112 Guntas, out of total extent of Ac.20- 29 Guntas, situated at Pendyal Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, T.S by'disposing the Representation dated 08-09-2025, in accordance to law and render justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition r.rnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fileJ in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the Representation dated 08-09-2025 to not to interfere. to not to dispossess or vacate the Petitioner from her peaceful possession anc enjoyment of Agriculture lands, in accordance to law; Pending disposal of the rnain Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOLLU NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S and 6:---- The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN W.P. No.29680 of 2025 ORAI. ORDER: llcard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader fbr Reventre

2. Petitioner herein is seeking a directiorr to resporrdent Nos.2 to 4 to consider the representatiorr dated 08.09.2025 Llide thc aforesaid representation, petitioner sought a directiclt to resp:r-rdent Nos.2 to 4 not to entertain ally kind of registrations and mutation etc. Earlier she has filed a rvrit petitiorr vide W.P.No.26436 of 2025 to declare the inaction of responde'nt Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the representation submitterl by her.

3. [;ia'e order dated 03.09.2025, this Court disposed of the said rryrit petition granting liberty to the petitioner to submit online application along with all the relevant documents including joirrt statement in the form of sworn affidavit in terms of 7(2) of Rules, 2025 to the Competent Authority with a request to issue succession and mutation proceedings. On receipt of the same, it is for the Competent ALrthority to consider and dispose of the sanrc irr zrccordance r,vith law.

4. Instead of pursuing the aforesaid order, petitioner has filed the present writ petition to declare the irraction ol respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the representation dated 08.09.2025 submittcd by her to not tcl enrertain any kind of registrations and not to mutate in the narne ol'third parties, land grabbers with anti-social elernents. She has not mentioned the details of the same. 'fherefbre, petitioner is not entitled for any relief much less the relief sought in the present writ petition and the same is liable to be disrnissed

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT /TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC, to Sri Bollu Nagaraju, Advocate IOPUC] r

2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] To,

---,, ./

TJ TKS c^i/-, Two OD Copies

HIGH C:OURT DATED:2610912025

ORDER

WP.No.2l9680 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS () .J lns J 2 3 trB Trlli I' t' * * Fr rz\'\>e @