Telangana High Court
WP/29748/2025 of Barigela Rakesh Goud Vs The State of Telangana on 26 September 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT ON NO: 29748 oF 2025 Between: Barigela Rakesh Goud, S/o' satyal.ar?y9l?' Aged
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEIUBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT
ON NO: 29748 oF 2025
Between:
Barigela Rakesh Goud, S/o' satyal.ar?y9l?' Aged 351ryry-, occ Business, nyo."H.fr.fo . 1-24, Thukkuguda, Minkhal,- Maheswaram, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, rep by Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariate, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad'
3. The Revenue Divisional officer, Kandukur Division, Hyderabad
4. The Tahsildar, Maheswaram, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or writ in the nature of Mandamus duly declaring the interference of the 4th respondent with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners' property by putting a sign board showing it as Government land vide property an Extent of Acers 2.38 Guntas situated in Sy Numbers 71l1ut2l1t111l11111, (Ex. 1.38 Acs) BO 71 t1ut2t1l2(Ex.1.00 Acs), situated at Makhal Village, fVlaheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice apart from the being against the rights conferred under Article 300(A) of Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the respondents to remove the said sign board forthwith and not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the above property in the interest of justice I
I
..i
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition rnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondenls to remove the said sign board forthwith and not to interfere with the peaceful prssession and enjoyment of the property an Extent of Acers 2.38
Guntas situate,l in Sy Numbers 71l1ul2l1l1l1l1l1l1, (Ex. 1.38 Acs) Bv 71l1ul2l112
(Ex.1.00 Acs), situated at Makhal Village, [t/aheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the interest of justice Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA
Counselfor the Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
,.r'
tt,
lt
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
i
:lit
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRTT PE,TITIoN No.29748 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for id Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4.
2. Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Acs.2.38 guntas in Sy.Nos.TlllulZllllllllllll (extent Ac.1.38 guntas) and 7lllulZlll2 (extent Ac.1.00 guntas), situated at Makhal Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangareddy District, under the registered sale deeds bearing document Nos.1351 of 2023, dated 25.05.2023 and 2361 of 2022, dated 19.07.2022. In proof of the same, he has filed the copies of the latest pattadar passhook and title deeds. Even then respondent Nos.2 to 4 are interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property, without following the due procedure laid down under law. Challenging the said action of respondent \ \\ Nos.2 to 4, petitioner filed the present writ petition.
3. L,larned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instruct,ons, would submit that it is a ceiling land. However, respondent Nos.2 to 4 will take action against the petitioner by following the due procedure laid down under law.
4. Ir, the light of the said submission, this Writ petition is dispose,C of directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 to follow the due procedurre laid down under law before taking any action against the petitioner herein IVliscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. *SD/.C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGTSTRAR
To, PVL BS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
1. The Prircipal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariate, The State of Telangana, Hyderabad.
2. The Dis':rict Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, Hyderabad
4. The Tahsildar, Maheswaram, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.
5. One CC to SRl. P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA, Advocate TOPUCI
6. Two COs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. touTl
7. Two CD Copies I I I w,
? HIGH GOTJRT DATED :2t$19912025
1il t'rAR ?[2[ * !li,.-'J.;:, i.; L,l
ORDER
WP.No.29748 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS fis trl,l,n . ; i I III I