Telangana High Court

WP/29855/2025 of Veldandi Narsaiah Vs The State of Telangana on 26 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEI\,iIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29855 OF 2025 Between: 1. Veldandi Narsaiah, Occ.Agriculture, R/o Telangana.

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEI\,iIBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 29855 OF 2025

Between:

1. Veldandi Narsaiah,

Occ.Agriculture, R/o

Telangana.

S/o Veldandi Venkataiah, Aged about 66 years, H.No.8-5-231/2/EE, Laxmi Nagar, Karimnagar,

2. Dugyala Anjith Rao, S/o Dugyala lvlukunda Rao, Aged about 49 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o H.No.9-4-331/1, Sapthagiri Colony, Karimnagar, T6langana.

3. Veldandi Chaitanya Krishna, S/o Narsaiah, Aged about 39 years, Occ Business, R/o H.No.8-3-2'10l1/A, Bhagath Nagar, Karimnagar, Telbngana.

4. Dugyala Sandhya Rani, W/o Anjith Rao, Aged about 53 years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o H.No.9-4-331/1, Sapthagiri Colony, Karimbagar, Telangana.

...PETITIONERS

AND

ti

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secrelary, Revenue Department, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Telangana Secretariat, Hyderaba'd.

The District Collector, Karimnagar, Collectorate Complex, Karimnagar District.

The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-LAO, Karimnagar Division, Collectorate Complex, Karimnagar.

The Tahsildar, Karimnagar Urban lvlandal, Karimnagar District.

Karimnagar Municipal Corporation, Karimnagar, Rep. by its Commissioner Telangana State Tourism Development Corporation, 3-5-89'1 , Tourism House, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad - 500029.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, direction especially one in the nature of Wrrt of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering and trying to dispossess the petitioners from the lands (i) admeasuring 87.77 sq. yards in Sy.Nos-813, 8'14 and 815, 447, (ii) admeasuring 447.22 sq- yards, 1477.77

square yards in Sy.Nos.801, 802, BO3 and 806, (iii) admeas ring 1477.77 square yards in Sy.Nos.801,802, 803 and S06, (iv) admeasurr Sy.Nos.802, 803, 806 andgO7, (v) admeasuri ng 141

Sy.Nos.801, 802, 803, S06, (vi) admeasuring 12.1 sq. yarcs 806 and807, (vit) 244.44 sq. yards in Sy.Nos.8i 3, 81 4

admeasuring 228.55 sq. yards in Sy.Nos_g13, g.14 and81{, Kothirampur Locality, Karimnagar Revenue lrlandal, Karinrr purpose of laying permanent 100 feet road at Srrcilla Br,.

Deer Park, inspite of existing road of 33 feet at Sircilla B I

IA NO

1 0F 2025

Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Deer Park without issuing any notice and without forowrng ( ue process of raw is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice z.rd also violative of Articres 14, 21 and 300-A of the constitution of rndia and co sequenry direct the respondents forthwith not lo dispossess the petitioners frr m the Iands i.e. (i)

admeasuring Bt.7t sq. yards in Sy.Nos.813, 8.14 and815, 417, (ii) admeasuring 447.22 sq. ya.ds, 14Tt .77 square yards in Sy.Nos.801. 80 , g03 and 806, (iii)

admeasuring 1477.77 square yards in Sy.Nos.B0l.802. 803 and 806, (iv)

admeasuring 950 sq. yards in Sy.Nos.802, 803, 806 andt(2. (v) admeasuring 1477.77 sq. yards in Sy.Nos.80i, 802, 803, 806, (vi) admezr uring i21 sq. yards in Sy.Nos.801, 802, 806 and807, (vii) 244.44 sq, yards in lj /.Nos.8.13, 814 and 815 and (viii) admeasuring 22B.ss sq. yards in Sy.Nos.81 3, 8.r4 and815, a lands situated in Kothirampur Locarity, Karimnagar Revenue r4andar, Karimnagar District without following due procedure of law.

g 950 sq. yards in

7.77 sq. yards in

in Sy.Nos.801, 802,

and 815 and (viii)

all lands situated in

agar District for the

)ass road, opposite

pass road, opposite

the ci cumstances stated

Court .nay be pleased to

and815, 447, (ii)

rlos.801, 802, 803

801,802, 803 and

806 and 807, (v)

(vi) admeasuring

.44 sq. yards in

ds in S y. Nos.81 3,

direct the respondents forthwith not to dispossess the petiti()r ers from the rands a

i.e. (i) admeasudng Bt.7t sq. yards in Sy.Nos.B13, 81,1

admeasuring 441 .22 sq. yads. 1477.77 square yards in S1,.

and 806, (iii) admeasurin g 1477 .17 square yards in Sy.Nos 806, (iv) admeasuring 950 sq. yards in Sy.Nos.802, 803

admeasuring 1417 .77 sq. yards in Sy.Nos.B01, 802, 803, BC(

121 sq. yards in Sy.Nos.801. 802, 806 and807, (vii) 2,1, Sy.Nos.8'13, 814 8. 815 and (viii) admeasuring 228.55 sq. ya 814 and 815, all lands situated in Kothirampur Locality, Karimnagar Revenue Mandal, Karimnagar District without following due procedure of law, pending disposal of the main wril petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI BALA MURALI.Y

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: SRI L.RAV|NDER, AGp FOR REVENUE

Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: SRI K,SIDDHARTH RAO, SC FOR MCPL

Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRt PUTTA KRTSHNA REDDY, SC TGSTDC

The Court made the following: ORDER

.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE IC LI. GHMAN

WRIT PETITION No.29855 of 20! !

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the p,: itioners and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Governmen Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4.

2. The petitioners herein filed the present ,r rit petition to declare the action of the respondents in interfe 'ing with and trying to dispossess them from their lands, -admeasuring various extents in Survey Nos. 801, 802, 803, 106, 807, 813, 814, and 815, situated in Kothirampur Localitl, Karimnagar Revenue Mandal, Karimnagar District, for th: purpose of laying a 100-feet road at Sircilla Bypass Road rpposite Deer Park, despite the existence of a 33-feet roal and without issuing any notice or following due process of I rw, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural jr stice, and in violation of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the ,- onstitution of India; and consequently to direct the respor dents not to dispossess the petitioners from the said lands without following due process of law.

3. Whereas, the learned Assistant Govemment pleader for Revenue has produced the written instructions of respondent No.3, which have been placed on record. In paragraphs 3 and4 of the said instructions, it is stated as under:- "Further, it is to submit that, the Petitioners have mentioned at Para 12 of the Affidavit i.e., the Hon'ble High Court granted interim direction in IA No. I of 2023 in WP No. 3446 of 2023 on 07-02-2023 and Court order dated 02-02-2023 in W.P.No. 3030 of 2023 are pertains to the land admeasuring 484.00 sq.yards in Sy.No. 62213; (484.00 sq,yards) in Sy.No. 62213 (H.No. 8-6-K00040) and H.No. 84-308/NNt (Assessment No. I 102059525) admeasurin g 1452.00 sq.yrds, like wise fiom the land admeasuritg 71.11 sq.yards in Sy.No. 62214 and, Iands admeasuing 551.11 sq. yards in Sy.No. 62214 situated at Bye-Pass Road, Rampur locality, Karimnagar City and District. But, not in respect of the lands mentioned in the present writ petitioner's affrdavit. In view of the above, it to submit that, it seems that, the Petitioners have filed this Writ Petition with an imagination view, as no such requisition has been received from any of the State/Central Govemment Departments."

4. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, since the grievance of the petitioners is redressed, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

J As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions per< ing, if any, shall stand closed. sD/- A.H.S,. GOWRI st IANT R SHANKAR-=-,- EGIS+RAF \ //TRUE COPY// To,

5. BSR BM ruT- riEcTtoN OFFtcER One CC to SRt BALA MURAL|.Y Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRt K.SIDDH ARTH RAO, SC FOR MCPL IoF{cl One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, Sc TGSTDC ,( }PUC] Iyf":r?:"1"r""#lFoR REVENUE, Hish court ror the Sr; e or reransana at Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED: 2610912025

ORDER

WP-No.29855 of 2025 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS ,,/:.rD';ii' ? g JAil 2028 oo I I ', sl c\,\,t ((

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead