WP/29828/2025 of Shaik Sathar Vs The State of Telangana on 26 September 2025

1. Shaik Sathar, S/o. Shaik Khasim, Aged about 66 years, agriculture Resident of Siddapur Village, Kothur [\/andal, Ranga Reddy District

2. Shaik Jilani, S/o. Shaik Khasim, Aged about 56 years, agriculture Resident of Siddapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERS AND

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Kongar Kalan, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Shadnagar Division, Shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District. The Tahsildar, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Mohd. Azharuddin, S/o Mohd. Allauddin, Aged about 50 years, business, Resident of H No. 10-5-64111A, Ahmed Nagar, First Lancer, Hyderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Tahsildar, Kothur, 4th respondent herein, in initiating and conducting mutation proceedings vide 8118712025 with regard to agricultural land in Sy. No. 139A and 139AA an extent of Ac. 12-34 Gts. situated in Siddapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy at instance of sth respondent as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and against to provisions of The Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Acl, 2025 and rules framed there under. t

I I I

:

t lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circunrstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings vide 8118712025 issued b,y The Tahsildar, Kothur, 4th respondent herein with regard to agricultural land in Sy. No. 139A and 139AA an extent of Ac. 12-34 Gts. situated in Siddapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of writ petjtion. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI R.R.KALYAN Counsel for the Resporrdents No.1to4: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.s : The Court made the following: ORDER a I

TT{E HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHNTAN WRIT PETITION No.29ti28 of 2A25 ORA.L ORDER: Heard Ieanrcd counsel fbr the petitioners and Mr.L.Rai inder, learned Assistant Government Pleader tbr Revenue.

2. Petitioncrs herein are claiming that they are the absolute ownors and possessors ol lancl admeasuring Acs.12.34 guntas in Sy.No.l39A and l39AA, situaled at Siddapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Rangareddy District. Respondent No.4 has filed W.P.No.22730 of 2022 against the petitioners and respondent Nos.1 to 4 hcrcin to declare the order dated 07.03.2020 passed by respondent No.4 without giving importance to the disrnissal of partition suit in O.S.No.64 of 2009 f,rled by the petitioners herein, as illegai.

3. Vide order daled 05.09.2024 in W.P.No.22130 of 2022. this Courl disposed of the said writ petition directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 therein to consider the mutation application bearing Challan No.PMM2300074803 submitted by respondent No.5 in respect ol thc subject propefty, slrictly in accordan,;e '"vith law, r.vithin trvo (2) months iorn the datc of receipt o1'a copy ol the said order. This Court also dilected tilem to co;rsider the pendency ol O.S.No.24 o1'2021 and O.S.No.l{) ot' 2022. ln cornpliance u,ith tl'r,: said oldcr, rcspondent No.4 has issued notice dated 28.03.2015. Challenging the said order, petitioners illed th,: plesent u rit pctrtro n rl. ,\s discussed suprLl, the impugned rtoticc dated 28.03.20i5 r,r,'as issued by respondent No.4 in cornpliar.rce lvith tl.re order dated 05.09.2024 in W.P.No.227-10 of 2022, directing tl.rt: petitioners aird respondent No.5 to submit all the rclevant docurnents.

5. According to the leamed counsel for the petitioners, petitioners aLnd respondent No.5 have already apireared betbre respondent l',1o.4 and submitted their objections a;rd documents in support of their respectirze claims. They have also raised a claim that r,lspondent No.4 has no jurisdiction trr initiate such proceedings.

6. As discussed supru. respondent No.4 has issued impugned notice dated 28.0i.2025 in cornpliance with the order dated 0,5.09.101.1 in \\'.P.No.227i0 of f022. Hor.vever'. he has to considcr the said objections ancl pass appropriate orders. in accordance t'itl.r lau.

7. In the light ol the sanrc. notice to respondcrrt No.5 is dispensed '"vith. This Writ Petition is disposed ot' dilccting petitioners pursuiint to the irnpugned notice dated 28.03.2025 issued in compliance' with tl.re order clated 05.09.2024 in W.P.No.22730 of 2022 and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance r,r,ith lar.r,, by putting the pctitioners. rcspondent No.5 and all intercstc-d pafiics ort nc'rtice ancl al'lording thetn alr opportunity. [Io',v* cr. 1ie shall completc the entirc cxetcise vvithin thirty (30) days fronr the date of receipt ol a copy ol tl.ris order. Liberty' is grantccl to thc petitioners to contend before respondent No.4 that he has no jurisdiction to initiate enquiry as per notice dated 28.03.2025. Respondent No.4 shall \ I consider the said aspect also.

respondent No.4 to consider the objcctions sr"rbn-ritted by thc

To, Miscellaneous applications, if any pending. shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/ PONNA KRISHNA ANT REGIS ,TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, S Telangana. Hyde-abad,

2. The District Colle:tor, Kongar Kalan, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Shadnagar Division, Shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Tahsildar. Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

5. One CC to SRI R.R.KALYAN, Advocate. [OPUC]

6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. louTI

7. Two CD Copies. BSK BS t{- at State of a !

I HIGH COURT DATED:2610912025

ORDER

WP.No.29828 ctf 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 15 tjti Ef, 1i ,,,. lo ct# (+- .-flt6\f I I