Telangana High Court
WP/29970/2025 of Vadthyavath Danapathi Vs The State of Telangana on 26 September 2025
S/o Vadthyavath Thovurya Ageq^ a !9lt 58 years' 6:;:i:;;;. frr.* i-"r?;,'itrvi'isrnoi kiot'ut Ranga Reddv 50e358 ...PETITIONER HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTETMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT
Between:
Vadthvavath Danapathi. S/o Vadthyavath Thovurya Ageq^a!9lt 58 years'
6:;:i:;;;. frr.* i-"r?;,'itrvi'isrnoi kiot'ut Ranga Reddv 50e358
...PETITIONER
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTETMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
[ 3,l68 ]
WRIT PETITION NO : 29970 0F 2025
Revenue DePartment,
the Paanies, inspite of the application dt'
visits, as being illegal, arbitrary' unjust and
AND
The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary Secretariat HYderabad.
The District Collector, R.R District, at Kongara Kalan'
The Tahsildar, Ra.iendernagar Mandal' R R District'
...RESPONDENTS
praYing that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ' Order or Direction' more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent No 3
herein in taking steps to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the lands in Survey Nos 468/17 with the extent of Ac 5'20 gts'
situated at Kadthal village, Kadthal Mandal' R R District as Pattadar/ owner duly
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia correcting the entries as Per 21tOBl2O25 followed bY Personal unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to mutate the name of the petitioner and other legal heirs as verifying the and Pahanies Pattadars in the revenue records by :. ...f lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filerl in support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to direct the Respondr:nt Nos.2 and 3 herein to consider arrd take appropriate action pursuant to t1e application dt 2110812025 pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, in ther i rterest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R.A.CHARY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR FIEVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.29970 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
2. The Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.5-20 guntas in Sy.No.468/17, situated at Kadthal Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. In the Bhu Bharathi portal, the said land is mentioned as Govemment land. Therefore, he has submitted an online application bearing No. 2500114553, dated 21.08.2025, to respondent No.2, with a request to correct the said wrong entry and to issue an E-Pattadar Passbook in his favour. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said online application, respondent No.2 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.2, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
3. Though the petitioner is claiming rights over the subject property, he has not filed any documents, including the old or latest \ pattadar passbooks. He has only submitted Pahanis for a few years. .j I
@ -*- 'at :. r- \4.:1.-i:.. 1.,:- - \., .\ \, However, it is for respondent No.2 to consider these aspects and dispose of the aforesaid online application subrnitted by the petitioner.
4. In liglrt of the aforesaid discussion, this Writ petition is disposed o[, directing respondent No.2 to consider irnd dispose of the online application bearing No. 2500114553, datt:d ZI.Og.2025, submitted b1' the petitioner with a request to corrr:ct the wrong entry and to issue an E-Pattadar Passbook in his favtur, strictly in accordance r,,,ith law, by putting the petitioner and all interested parties on no-ice and affording them an opportunity. If respondent No.2 is not irclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall pass orders assigning specific reasons and communicate a copy of the sarne to the petitioner. He shall complete the said exercise withLn a period of sixty (60) days from the <late of receipt of a copy ofltis order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a s,:quel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. DI P. PONNA KRISHNA rANT REGISTRAR :. ,/ //TRUE COPY//
1. The Principal S:cretary, Revenue Department, of Telangana.
2. The District Collector, R.R.District, at Kongara Kalan
3. The Tahsildar, Fla.jendernagar Mandal, R.R. District. 4 One CC to SRI ? A.CHARY, Advocate [OPUC] fiECTION OFFICER retarr:rt Hyderabad, State To,
I I I I
5. TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT] 6 Two CD CoPies BSR BS M/
HIGH COURT DATED: 2610{112025
ORDER
WP.No.29970 of 2025 >, [6 ocr l',.,1iai *-_ '' .\\'. 'll \\ m :t,! , :i ..i' ,7
- -.* .:7 ": '--u.:t I * D. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS
b q \