Telangana High Court
WP/29962/2025 of Moturi Latha Vs The State of Telangana on 26 September 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special OrQinal Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, TI.IE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO:29962 OF 2025 Between: Moturi Latha, Wo. Jaya Prakash, D/o. Late Duppati
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special OrQinal Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, TI.IE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO:29962 OF 2025
Between:
Moturi Latha, Wo. Jaya Prakash, D/o. Late Duppati Sathyanarayana. Age. 40 years, Occupation. Agriculture, R/o. H. No. 3-22,22O KV Sub-Station, Manuguru Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.
4. The Tahsildar, Burgampahad Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.
5. Duppati Mohan Rao, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, Age, 66 years,.Occ. Retd., Eniiloyee, Fl/o. Sarapaka, Burgampahad Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District - 507128.
6. Duppati Vijaya, Wo. Late Sathyanarayana, Age. 55 years, Occ.,Housewife, R/ri. Nagirieni Reddy Palem, Burgampahad Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District - 507114.
7. Duppati Subhadra, S/o. Late Veeraiah, Age. 53 years, Occ. Housewife, FI/o. Naiineni Reddy Palem, Burgampahad Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District - 5O7114.
8. Duppati Raju, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, Age Nagineni Reddy Palem, Burgampahad District - 5O7114. 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem Duppati Venkata Ramana, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, Ag Aoii6ulture, Ri/o. Nagineni Reddy Palem, Burgampahad Kothagudem District - 507114. I
10. Posham Laxmi, Wb. Posham Narasimha Rao Housewife, Ri/o. Back of Tebphone Exchange, Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District - 507 1 17
e. 53 years, Occ. Mandal, Bhadradri- Age. 54 years, Occ. Ashok Nagar, Manguru ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the I ligh Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particulad'l in the nature writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No. ,l in entertaining any application for mutation or entry in the revenue records in tt spect of agricultural land in Sy. No. 389/2/AA/2 admeasuring to an extent of Ac. ( -10 gts and Sy. No. 390l1lBl2 admeasuring to an extent of Ac. 3-12 gts, total adnt 'asuring to an extent of Ac.3-22 gts, situated at Nagineniprolu Revenue Village, Eit rgampahad Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, despite petitione/s repres()r tation dated 'l 1-07- 2025 and pendency of suit, O.S. No. 369 ot 2O25 on the file c the leamed Special Agent to Government and District Magistrate-cum-() )llector, Bhadradri- Kothagudem District, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Artir 3s 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently dkect the Res rondent No. 4 not to entertain or effect any mutation in respect of the subject rroperty in favour of Respondents No. 5 to 10 or any third party. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r :umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mit be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 to consider and dispose of the petiti )ner's representation daled 11-07-2025 in respect of agricultural land in ;y. No. 38Sl2lAAl2 admeasuring to an extent of Ac. 0-10 gts and Sy. No, 3901 lBl2 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.3-12 gts, total admeasuring to an extent ol \c. 3-22 gts, situated at Nagineniprolu Revenue Village, Burgampahad Mandal, [] radradri-Kothagudem District, in accordance with law, pending disposal of the ma n writ petition, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURYA BALU MAHENDRI, Gounsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: SR! L. RAVtNtlEFl, AGP FOR REVENUI: Counsel for the Respondents No.5 to 10: - The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.29952 of 2025 oRAL ORDER: Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4.
According to the petitioner, her patemal grandmother, namely, late Smt.Duppati Bhadramma was the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac'0'10 guntas tn Sy.No.389/2/ AAl2 and Acs.3.12 guntas in Sy'No'390/l/B/2' total land admeasuring Acs-3.22 guntas, situated at Nagineniprolu Revenue Village, Burgampahad Mandal' Blradradri - Kothagudem District. She has filed a suit in O.S.No.369 ol 2025 against respondent Nos'5 to l0 seeking partition and separate possession of the subject property' She has also flled an Interlocutory Application in the said suit seeking to restrain respondent Nos.5 to l0 from alienating the subject property and from changing the physical t-eatures of the subject property and the same is pending' i : I I I
3. During the pendency of the said srr r and the said Interlocutory Application, she has submitted I representation dated I 1.01 .2025 to respondent No.4 with i request not to entertain any documents submitted by resporrr ent Nos.5 to 10 in respect o[ the subject property. The same was not considercd. Thereforc, challenging the st id inaction of respondent No.4, petitioner filed the present w it petition.
4. As discussed supra, the suit ar I Interlocutory Application filed by the petitioner for parlit ln and sep:rate possession and not to alienate the subject prol) )rty are pending. During thc pendcncy of thc said suit and tte Interlocutory Application, thc petitioner can't subm ir representation 11.07.2025 to rcspondcnt No.4 with a requej not to entertain any docurncnr subtnitted by respondent Nos.j to l0 in respect of the subjcct prol)elty and also she can't file the present writ petition allcging non-consideration of the se.i I representation. Thereforc. ltctitioncr is not entitled for the rel ef much less the relief sought in thc prescnt writ petition.
I To MP TJ b.
5. tn the light of the same, this Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, dismissed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach respondent No.4 after obtaining orders in the said Interlocutory Application or in the said suit. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/- S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO STANT REGISTRA //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER
1. One CC to SRI SURYA BALU MAHENDRA, Advo PUCI
2. fwo CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTt
3. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT DATI iD:2610912025 a c) 'J i) 2 r fE8 2026
ORDER
WP.Nc, 29962 ol2O25 DISMISSING THE Vl RIT PETITION WII HOUT COSTS 7,?' )-b I I I I I I I I I t I I i It I I IIi I I I i I I I i i : i I i I