Telangana High Court
WP/29979/2025 of Vadde Pedda Narsimulu @ Narsimulu Vs The State of Telangana on 26 September 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENW SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO:29979 OF 2025 Between: 1. Vadde Pedda Narsimulu @ Narsimulu, S/o. Late V.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENW SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO:29979 OF 2025
Between:
1. Vadde Pedda Narsimulu @ Narsimulu, S/o. Late V. Venkataiah @
Yenkataiah, Aged about 50 years, Occ ; Agriculture, Rl/o. Pudugoorti Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana State.
2. Vadde Chinna Narsimulu @ Narsimulu, Sio.Late V. Venkataiah @
Yenkataiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ ; Agriculture, Rl/o. Pudugoorti Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana State.
3. Vadde Ramulu, S/o. Late V. Yenkaiah @ Venkataiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ ; Agriculture, R/o. Pudugoorti Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana State.
.....PETITIONERS
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Dept of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
2. The District Collector, Vikarabad District, Telangana State.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad division Vikarabad District, Telangana State.
4. The Tahasildar, Pudugoorti Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana State.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or a direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the official respondents to pass orders on the grievance application filed in the Dharani Portal Now Bhu Bharathi Portal for the missing extent of Ac.0.23gts out of the total extent of Ac.3.07gts vide online grievance application No.2500020860 dated 29-03-2o2s and may be directed to make the necessary corrections in the Revenue Records and issue new corrected patta passbooks to the petitioners for the petitioners total agricultural land in Sy.No.s4
(New sy.No.54iAA) to an extent of Ac.3-07guntas situated at pudugoorti Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana state which actually should be i.e.
Petitioner No.1 showing Ac.0.35gts (it shoutd be Ac.1.03gts) in sy.No.54/AA/.1
vide Khatha No. 71 1, Petitioner No.2 showing Ac.0.3sgts (it should be Ac.1.02gts)
in sy.irlo.s4iAAl2 vide Khatha No.712, petitioner No.3 showing Ac.0.34gts (it should be Ac.1.02gts) in sy.No.54/AA/3 side Khatha No. 713 and also declaring the highhanded action of the respondents in not passing the order on the grievance application mentioned above as arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2O2s
Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the official respondents to pass orders on the grievance application filed in the Dharani Portal Now Bhu Bharathi portal for the missing extent of Ac.0.23gts out of the totar extent of Ac.3.07gts ride online grievance application No.2500020860 dated 2g-o3-202s and may be directed to make the necessary corrections in the Revenue Records and issue new corrected patta passbooks to the petitioners for the petitioners total agricultural land in sy.No.54 (New Sy.No.54/AA) to an extent of Ac.3-O7guntas situaied at pudugoorti Village, pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana State which actually should be i.e.
Petitioner No.1 showing Ac.0.35gts (it should be Ac.1.03gts) in sy.No.54/AA/1
vide Khatha No. 71 1, Petitioner No.2 showing Ac.0.3bgts (it should be Ac.1.02gts)
in Sy.No.S4/AAl2 vide Khatha No. 712, petitioner No.3 showing Ac.0.34gts (it should be Ac.'l .02gts) in sy.No.54lAA/3 vide Khatha No. 7'r3, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of equity of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioners : M/s. OM LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondents : SRI L.RAVINDER, AGp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following ORDER
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
2. According to the petitioners, their father, late Sri v. venkataiah @ Yenkataiah, was the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.3-07 guntas in Sy. No. 54lAA, situated at Pudugoorti village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District. After his death, the petitioners succeeded the said property. But, a portion of the land is missing from the Bhu Bharathi portal. Therefore, petitioner No. 3 submitted an online application to the respondents, with a request to correct the said wrong entry. However, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court for the petitioners to submit individual online applications to the competent authority, with a request to correct the said wrong entry. A direction may accordingly be given to the competent authority to consider the individual online applications submitted by the petitioners. \ &,'
To
3. Considering the aforesaid request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, and the old and latest passbooks, the writ petition is disposed oe, granting liberty to the petitioners to submit individual online applications to the competent authority, along with all relevant documents, in terms of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Rules, 2025, with a request to correct the wrong entry and issue fresh e-Pattadar passbooks. on receipt of the said applications, the competent authority shall consider and dispose of the same within 60 days. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed, Sd/. G. JYOTHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //rRUE coPYtt G SECTION OFFICER
1. T.he Secretary, Dept of Revenue, Secretariat, State of Telangana at Hyderabad, Telangana State.
2. The District Collector, Vikarabad District, Telangana State.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad Division Vikarabad District, Telangana State.
4. The Tahasildar, Pudugoorti Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana State.
5. Two ccs to GP FoR REVENUE, High court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
6. One CC to tM/s. OtV LAW FIR[M, Advocate IOPUC]
7. Two CD Copies SA F/
- HIGH COURT DATED:26109t2025
ORDER
WP.No.29979 of 2O2S DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. J I J ) 6 ilB'l illt -1.
b t\