Telangana High Court
WP/29403/2025 of Smt. Kamadana Laxmi Namratha Vs The State of Telangana, on 25 September 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29403 OF 2025 Between: 1. Smt. Kamadana Laxmi Namratha, D/o. K.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 29403 OF 2025
Between:
1. Smt. Kamadana Laxmi Namratha, D/o. K. Satynanrayana Rao, Aged about 46
V"ars, Occ. Housewife, Ryo. Diamond Point' Secunderabad.
2. Sri Kotagiri Seethapathi Rao, S/o. Rama Narsimha Rao, Aged about 68
- V"ai", OdC. Agriculture, Fl/o. Tiruvuru, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh'
3 sri Kotaoiri Venkat Rao, S/o. Rama Narsimha Rao, Aged about 66 years,
- OCc. Agiiarlture, Rl/o. Tiruvuru, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh'
4. Sri Kamadana Srinivasa, Jagannatha Rao S/o-. Mohan Rao,^ged about 65
' V""r., O"". Agriculture, Rl/o. Tiruvuru, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh'
...PETITIONERS
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of ''
Revenue, SecretariaiB uild ings, Saifabad' Hyderabad.
2. The chief commisioner of Land Administration, Telangana state, Nampally Station Road, Abids, HYderabad.
3. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.
4. The Revenue Divisional officer, Rajendranagar Revenue Division, Ranga ReddY District.
5. The Tahsildar, Serilingampalty tVandal. Ranga Reddy District'
...RESPONDENTS
petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos.3 in not considering the representation dated 1 8.1 -l .2024 made by the vendor of the petitioners and not updating the revenue records in respect of their lands in Sy. No.11/1 , situated at Khanamet Village, serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary, and I
!
,
l
!
zintrary to Article 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lr to direct the respondent No.3 to consider the representat made by the vendor of the petitioners and update the ret r pahanis, 'l -B Form, RoR in their names in respect of I
Ac.0'1 .20 guntas belonging- to the petitioner Nos.1 and 2' '
guntas belonging to the petitioner Nos.1, an extent of Ac.Ci to the petitioner No.2, and an extent of Ac.01 .18 gurtl petitioner No.4, which are in Sy. No.1 1/'l , situated ,i Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District, in the interest of jusli 1ia and consequently rn dated 18.11.2024
rue records such as
e land an extent of
n extent of 4c.O2.20
20 guntas belonging
rs belonging.to the
Khanamet Village,
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ctt ;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Cc r rt may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to consider the representation d: ed 18.11.2024 made by the vendor of the petitioners and update the revenue rer'< rds such as pahanis, 1-B Form, RoR in their names in respect of the land an ext') rt of Ac.O'l .20 guntas belonging to the petitioner Nos.'1 and 2, an extent of Ac.02. l guntas belonging to the petitioner Nos.1, an extent of Ac.02.20 guntas belor( rng to the petitioner No.2, and an extent of Ac.01.18 guhtas belonging to the [ ]trtioner No 4, which are in Sy. No.11/1 , situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingt I rpally, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel forthe Petitioners: SRI ASHOK KUMAR KOTAGI ll Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FCtl REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.29403 OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned counscl for the petitioners and Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioners herein have filed the present writ petition to declare the inaction ofrespondent No-i in considering the representation dated 18.11.2024 made by the vendor of the petitioners and updating revenue records in respect of their lands in Survey No.l l/1, situated at Khanamet Village. Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District, as illegal.
3. The petitione rs are claiming right over the saidproperty basing on sale deed dated 21.0i.19E5, r'alidated on 19. 10.2019. They have submitted representation only on I 8. I 1.2024. 'lhere is abnormal delay.
4. Vide the aloresaid rcpresentation, dated 18.11.2024, the petitioners rcquested respondcnt No.i to update pahanies in Dharani Portal as per Khasra Pahani Records in respcct of land admeasuring Acs.7.38 gunta-s in Survcy No. I l/l of Khanapet Revenue Village. The ::t subject property lalls within GHMC limits and, therefore, it is not a" J'
agricultural land' Therefore' the provisions of the Telanlir na Rights tn I,and and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 2020 and the Teanganr l]hu Bharati (Record ofRights in land) Act"2024 are not applicabte'r the subject property. It is apt to note that Section - 3 of the Teangatu Bhu Bharati (Record of fughts in land) Act'2024 deats with 'non-app cation o[ the Act, 2024 in certain cases'' 2024 is extracted as under: Sub-Section (7) of Section - I ol'the Act' \ "(7) Nothing in this Act shall apply to Non-Agricult ral land in urban areas as may be notified b'v hc Govemment."
5. As stated above, the subject prope(y fatls vr i I in the G[{MC limits. Therefore, the petitioners cannot subm it hc tr{bresaid representation dated 18'11'2024 to respondent No'3 rri t a rcquest tct update Dharani Portal as per Khasra Pahani Records anrl :ilc thc prcscnt writ petition alleging non-consideration of the said repres rrtation' Thus' the petitioners are not entitled for any reliet" much less t re rclief sou'cht in the Present writ Petition'
6. This writ petition is liabte to be dismissed ntl thc sar.rle rs accordingly dismissed. However' liberty is granted to I re pctitioncrs to work out remedies available to them' In the circumstrL ccs ttf the case' there shltl be no order as to costs'
As a sequel thereto, mlscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ^:"J'SJttit''-"ts'ffi SECTTON OFFICER To,
1. One CCto SRI ASHOKKUMAR KOTAGIRI' Advocate IOPUCI
2. Two CCs to:GP FOR REVENUE' High Court for the State bf Telangana tourl /TTRUE COPY//
3. Two CD CoPies PVL sv
HIGH COURT DATED:2 510912025
ORDER
togTHt S; j,^ t:. r9 WP.No.29403 of 2025 :,, :.J
u6 z * * E) DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WIHTOUT COSTS tq G l I