Telangana High Court

CRP/2522/2025 of VNR SEEDS PVT. LTD. Vs V. Kumara Swamy on 25 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA // AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:2522OF 2025 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, Aggrieved by the Order dated 09

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA // AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEIUBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:2522OF 2025

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, Aggrieved by the Order dated 09 05 2025 passed in Revision Petition No. 563 of 2025, along with 1A.No.4386 ot 2025 and lA No.4387 oi 2025 on the file of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commrssion, New Delhi.

Between:

VNR SEEDS PVT LTD., Through lts Authorized Representative, Mr. P. Srinivasa Swamy, Present Address - Corporate Centre Canal Road Crossrng Rrng Road No.1, Rarpur, Chhattisgarh. Previous address- Ratnagiri Arcade, G.E. Roas, Opp. Ral Kumar College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner/ Petitioner/ Opposite Party No.3

ANO

1 . V. Kumara Swamy, Present Address -H. No 6-10, Warangal Drstrict, Dharmaram village And Mandal Geesugonda, Warangal, Telangana.

... RespondenURespondenUComplainant

2. M/S Sri Mamata Agro Chemlcals, Present Address - H.No.16-7-30, Opp City Bus Station Warangal warangal, Telangana Area S

Cross,3

Main Road,

s Manager

its

nd

al

td es Manager

Area Sale

4. The Assistant Director Horticulture Department, Present Address - O/o.

Excise Colony. Warangal District Warangal, Telangana.

... RespondenuRespondenUOpposite Party Nos.1, 2 & 4

5. The District Collector, Warangal

Present Address-Rep to the State of Telangana, Warangal, Telangana.

(Deleted as Party as per the Docket Order dated 16.12.2015)

(Respondent No. 5 / Opposite Party No. 5 herein is not a necessary Party to the present proceedings srnce its deletion from array of parties as per Docket Order dated 16 12.2015)

... RespondenURespondenUOpposite Party No.5

M/s. Prabhakar Hybrid Seeds, Represented by Present Address - No 2, Sri Saraswathi Complex, 2

Gandhi Nagar, Bangalore, Now Rep By lts

Sri. A Aravinda reddy.

lA NO: 'l OF 2025

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the ) rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition the High Coul may be pleased to suspend the impugned order dated 09.05.2025, pass,)cl by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, in Rr-.vision Petitlon No.

563 of 2025 and stay of the execution proceedings in E A. l.to .6 of 2025 in C.C.

No. 211 of 2015 pending before the District Consumer [)isputes Redressal Commrssion, Warangal District, pending the dtsposal of the rlain CRp.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

Ms. SARVANI DESIRA, U, Advocate

Counsel forthe Respondent No.f :

Mr. DRV YAGNESWIR, Advocate

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 5:

NONE APPEAFED

The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER

n

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K' LAKSHMAN

C.R.P. No.2522 of2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed chatlenging the order dated 09.05.2025 ol the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, in Revision Petition No'563 of 2025'

2. Petitioner filed the said revision challenging the order dated 20.0g.2024 in F.A'No'485 ot 2019 along with I'A'Nos'4386 and 4387 ol 2025 tostay and condone the detay of99 days' beyond 90 days granted lor filing revision petition before the National Commission contending that after the disposal of the appeal by the State Commission, petitioner obtained record from the counsel appeared its behalf in the State Commission gave those documents to counsel in New Delhi and the process of transition of entire records fiom l-lyderabad to New Delhi and for appointing the counsel in New Dethi' Thus' there is delay of 99 days' The same is neither willful nor wanton' There are specific assertions to the said effect in paragraph Nos'5 to 7 of affidavit hled before the National Commission in I'A'No'4387 of 2025' j

3. Without considering the said aspects, vlrtr Order dated 09.05.2025, the National Commission dismi:;sed the said application on the ground that petitioner did n()t lnention any sufficient cause seeking condonation of 99 days de ay. The said linding of the National Commission is contrary to the contentions raised by the petitioner in Paragraph Nos.4 and 5 ol the affidavit before the State Commission.

4. As discussed supra, in paragraph Nos.4 an<l 5, petitioners have specifically narrated reasons lor the delay. Th,:refore, leamed National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissic,n, New Delhi, can't dismiss the said petition holding the petit oners did not mention suffi cient reasons

5. In the light of the said discussion. this Court is of the opinion that the reasons stated by the petitioners are sullii i,:nt cause for seeking condonation of delay and this Civil l{evisic,n Petition is allowed setting aside the impugned order dated 09.r):;.2025 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissio r. New Delhi, in Revision Petition No.563 of 2025. In vieu, c,f the same, I.A.Nos.4386 and 4387 of 2025 are allowed. the Nationat "Sx"

J Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, is directed to dispose olthe Revision Petition No.563 of 2025 of the petitioner in accordance with law. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. V.KAVITHA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER

1. The National Consumer Drsputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi.

2. The Assistant Director Horticulture Department, Present Address - O/o Excise Colony, Warangal District Warangal, Telangana

3. The District Collector, Warangal

4. One CC to Ms SARVANI DESIRAJU, Advocate [OPUC]

5. One CC to Mr. DR V YAGNESWAR, Advocate [OPUC]

6. Two CD Copies W RC/PSL To,

HIGH COURT DATED: 2510912025

ORDER

CRP.No.2522 of 2025 )1 ,f ::::=:: c 'J :\, (a o '.L a) I This Civil Revision Petition is Allowed. \'o ,'f i r'. ' xj- C;r {.i ,aili ,'t';ri' -.,-'/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead