Telangana High Court
WP/29592/2025 of Kodati Venkanna Vs The State of Telangana on 25 September 2025
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN NO: 29592 OF Between AND 1. The State Department, (q{at1v_e_n\qnna, S/o K, Mallaiah, Aged about
[ 3168 J
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
NO: 29592 OF
Between
AND
1. The State
Department,
(q{at1v_e_n\qnna, S/o K, Mallaiah, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o
H. No.5-85, Kukkadam Village, Madgulapalli Manddl, Nalgonda D-istrict
...PETITIONER
of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda,
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, [Vliryalaguda, Nalgonda District.
4. The Tahsildar., Madgulapalli Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of tndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the it action of the respondents in not mutating the petitioner name in the revenue records for lands in Survey Nos.70 to an extent of Ac.0-09 cents, Sy.No:76 to an extent of Ac.0-06 cents, Sy.no.77 to an extent of Ac.0-09 cents, and Sy,No.78 to an extent of Ac.0-004 cents of Kukkadam Village, Madgulapalli Mandal, Nalgonda District, despite registered sale deeds, as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith effect mutation, record the names of the petitioners in the revenue records, and issue pattadar passbooks and title deeds.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the rer;pondents to mutate the petitioner name in the revenue records for lands in Surrrey Nos. 70 to an extent of Ac.0-09 cents, Sy.No.76 to an extent of Ac.0-06cents, Sy.No 77 to an extent of Ac.0-09 cents, and Sy.No.78 to an extent of Ac.0-004cents of Kukkadam Village, Madgulapalli fr/andal, Nalgonda District, pending dispcsal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.SREENIVASA YADAV
counsel for the Respondents: sRl L.RAVINDER, AGp FoR REVENUE
The Court m;rde the following: ORDER
\
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TC LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.29592 of 2025
o
o
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L-Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
2.
The petitioner herein claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.0-09 guntas in Sy.No.70; Ac.0-06 guntas in Sy.No.76; Ac.0-09 guntas in sy.No.77; and Ac.0-04 guntas in Sy.No.78, situated at Kukkudam village, Madgulapalli Mandal, Nalgonda District. He has submitted an application during Revonue Sadassu to respondent No.2, with a iequest to mutate his name in respect of the said property and to issue an E-Pattadar Passbook. Respondent No.2, Sub-Collector and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Miryalguda, issued a notice in June 2025
but has not proceeded further. Hence, challenging the said inaction of respondent No.2, the present writ petition has been filed.
3.
whereas, the learned Assis Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondent No.2 will consider the aPPlication submitted by the petitioner strictly tl 1n .;a ' :_-:iu \
\
accordance with law
\
:d
€:c'
!F
4.
k, the light of the said submissions, this writ petition is disposec of, directing respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the application, submitted by the petitioner with a request to mutate his name in respect of the subject property and to issue an E-pattadar Passbool<, strictly in accordance with law, by putting the petitioner and all interested parties on notice and affording them an opportunity.
If resporrdent No.2 is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall pass orders assigning specific reasons and communic ate a copy of the same to the petitioner. However, he shall complete, the said exercise within a period sixty (60) days from the date of r;ceipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
Ar; a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall -s-taud elo-sed. - SD/.K.BHAVANI SWAMY
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY/
G
To,
sEcTtoN oFF|CER
1' The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.
2. The District Collector, Natgonda District, Nalgonda,
3. The Rervenue Divisional officer, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District.
4. The Tahsildar, Madgurapaili Mandar, Nalgonda District.
5. one co to sRr N.SREENTVASA YADAV, Advocate topucl 6' Two ctls to GP FoR REVENUE, High court for the state of retangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
7. Two Ct) Copies
BSR
BSu
*,
HIGH COURT
DATED i 2510912A25
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.29592 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ,) .:
ou