Telangana High Court
WP/29589/2025 of Putta Rathria Kumari Vs The State of Telangana on 25 September 2025
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPIEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29589 OF 2025 Between: Putta Rathna Kumari, Wo. Late. Putta [Vlaharashi Ramesh
I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPIEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 29589 OF 2025
Between:
Putta Rathna Kumari, Wo. Late. Putta [Vlaharashi Ramesh Kumar, Aged 52
years, Occ. Housewife, Rio. H.No 1-49, Siddulakunta, Adilabad District - 504105
...PETITIONER
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad The District Collector, Nirmal District The Tahsildar, Soan Mandal, Nirmal District Secretary, Revenue
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not issuing the Family Member's Certificate to the petitioner. inspite of petitioner making specific representation dated 30.06.2025 as highly illegal and arbitrary, consequently direct the 3rd respondent to forthwith issue Family fi/embers Certificate to the petitioner in order to enable her to avail service benefits of her deceased husband.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mity be pleased to direct the 3'd respordent to forthwith issue family members ,:ertificate to the petitioner in order to enable her to avail service benefits of her deceased husband, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMESH KADARI
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR RE\/ENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
,
\
\
THE HONOURABLB SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revcnuc appearing for the respondents.
2.
According to the petitioner, she has submitted a representation dated 26.06.2025 to respondent No.J, with a request to issue Family Members Certificate in favour of the late Sri Putta Maharshi Ramesh Kumar, S/o Putta Marenna, who passed away on 28.08.2017. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representation, respondent No.3 did not consider the request made by the petitioner. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.3, the petitioner has fiied the present writ petition.
3.
Though the petitioner claims to have sent the representation dated26.06.2025 to respondent No.3 through Rcgistered Post with Acknowledgment Due on 30.06.2025, she has not liled either the postal tracking report or the postal acknowledgment as proof of /
service of the said representation on respondent No.3. Even then, WRIT PETITION No.29589 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
r-r- .l she has filed the present writ petition, alleging non-considr:ration of the said representation by respondent No.3.
4. ln light of the aforesaid discussion, the wnt p,rtition is disposed ol, directing respondent No.3 to consider and dispose of the representat on dated 26.06.2025, sent by the petitione: through Registercd Post with Acknowledgment Due, if the same has been received, in ac:trdance with law, within a period of 30 days from the date of rec,:ipt of a copy of this order. There shalI be no order as to cosls As a serluel, miscellaneous petitions pending, rf any, shall stand closed. SD/.A. S]tINIVASA REDDY (:ISTANT RE S =CTION GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, BSR BS rk
1. The Princrpitl Secretary, Revenue Deparlme Hyderabad. S tate of Telangana.
2. The District Collector, Nirmal District.
3. The Tahsrldar , Soan Mandal, Nirmal District {lec-etariat Buildinqs.
4. One CC to SItl RAfvtESH KADARI, Advocate [OPUC] 5'TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT]
6. Two CD CoPies +- \
HIGH COURT DATED: 25l0t)12025
ORDER
if (.( (; s14 WP.No.2958tt ,cf 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT C()STS qd,d% (t- aafolq" o t) t 2 t [[I 206
C,