Telangana High Court
WP/29278/2025 of Mr. Mohd Abdul Wajid Vs The State of Telangana on 24 September 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29278 OF 2025 [ 3168 ] .....PETITIONERS * * & + * Between: AND 1 2 3 4 5
I
**
*
*
+
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 29278 OF 2025
.....PETITIONERS
*
*
&
+
*
Between:
AND
I\/ r. tt/ohd Ahdul Wajid, S/o Late lVlohd tvlohammed yousuf, Aged about 62
years, Occ ; Eusiness, R/o. H. No.20-7-399/4, Fathe Dawvaza, Mohd Shukoor ki Kaman, Charminar, Hyderabad.
Mohd Abdul Wahab, S/o. Late. lVlohd tt/ohammed yousuf, Aged about 5g years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. 2O-7-3991A, Fathe Darwaza, Mohd Shukoor ki Kaman, Charminar, Hyderabad.
Nasreen Fatima, Dio. Late. I\/ohd l/ohammed Yousuf, Wo. Late. IVd. Toufiq, Aged about 56 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H. No. 20-7-399/4, Fathij Darwaza, I\lohd Shukoor ki Kaman, Charminar, Hyderabad.
Mohd Abdul Zakir, S/o Late. Mohd Mohammed Yousuf, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No.20 -7-3991A, Fathe Darwaza,- Mohd Shukoor ki Kaman, Charminar, Hyderabad.
Ahmadi Fatima, D/o. Late. IVIohd Mohammed Yousuf, Wo. Shehroz Hussain, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H. No. 20-7-399/4, Fathe Darwaza, [\/ohd Shukoor ki Kaman, Charminar, Hyderabad.
1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary For Revenue Department, Secretarrat, Hyderabad.
2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ameenpur l\rlandal, Sangareddy District.
3 Vijay Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. Not known to petitioner, Aged about Not known, Occ ; Not Known, R/o. 4-4111, Ameenpur village, Ameenpur, Sangareddy.
4. Manne Satyanarayana, S/o. Not known to petitioner, Aged about. Not known, Occ. Not Known, R/o. 1-3611011, Road No. 5, Jawahar colony, Chanda Nagar, Ameenpur village, Ameenpur, Sangareddy.
*
ts
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be i pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction mc r:) particularly one in the nature of Writ of I\/andamus declaring the action of the r,-'spondent No. 2 in not considering the oetitionels representation dated 15-09-2 125 likewise an online application vide application No. 2500'127703 through l\4e,eseva vide transaction lD. 315780000018851 and Bhu Bharati Ref No. 250012r-'03 dated 111912025 as arbitrary, illegal :rnd violative of Articles 14 19 and 21 of ihe Constitution of lndra and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to consid:r the online application vide application No. 25OO127703 through lVleesev: vide transaction lD.
3.1 57800000188t,1 and Bhu Bharati Ref No. 250012770:\ dated 111912025 in lhe interest of justice.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2021;
Petition Urrder Section 151 CPC praying that in the .:ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High C rirrt may be pleased to direct the respordent No. 2 to cancel the Bhu-Bharatrr pattadar passbooks issued on the narnes of respondent No. 3 and 4 on all that land in survey no. 456, admeasuring Ac-e 0 - 06 guntas, Ameenpur (Vand[4) Sangareddy district, rssued in the narnes of respondent No.3 and 4, in the inte ost of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI SHAIKH CHAND AHMET)
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : SRI L.RAVINDEFI, AGP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : -- The Court made the following ORDER
I*
{
*
G
*
4.
{F
r+
rt
t*
a
t
I
.THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.29278 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard lcarned counsel tirl the petitioners and Mr.L.Ravinder. learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.
2. According to thc petitioncrs, their father late Mohammed Yousuf, was the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.l.08/z guntas in Sy.Nos.418. 45 I and 456 situated at Ameenpur Village and Mandal, Sangareddy l)istrict. lIe died on 12.01 .2011 ln proof of thc same, thev hai,c filed copies of old pattadar passbook and death ccrlifrcate. 'fhus, according to the petitioners, they have suoceeded the said property. tlven then, the names of respondent Nos.3 and 4 are rellecting in Dharani Portal and Bhu Bharathi Portal. Thus, there is wrong entry. They have submitted online application vidc I.D.No.2500127'703, dated 11.09.2025, to the District Collector, Sanga l{eddy District, with a request to correct the said wrong entry and issue e-pattadar passbook Despite receiving and acknowledging the said online apptication, District Collector did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inactior.r ol tne District Collector, petitioners havc I ,:d the present wflt petltton I.D.No.2500127103, dated ll 09.2025 and dispos_' of rhc same, acr,trdance with law, by putting thc -r.:titioncrs and l. Whcrcas, leamed Assistant Ciovemmcn r Pleacler firr to consid:r the aforesaid online app rr:ation vide Rer enue. on instrtrctions, would subntit tltat the sLri'; .'ct f rllncft\' s in Amcenpur Village and Mandal, Sanga Reddy l)L:;trict and is in urban iLrea. lhercfore, in telms of Scction 3(7) rr I rhe 'fclangana Blru Illrarathi Act,2025, petitioners are not entitlctl l rr mutation ol their names
4. As di;cusscd supra, though thc pctitioncrs r,.e contcnding that they liai,c submitted online application r r the District Collector, Sanga Reddy, they have not rnade the I)i i rict C-olleclor, Sanga l{edd.r District, as parly to the pre se nt writ Pr 1 I 1is6. 'lhouglt pelitioncrs' tather died on 12.1 .201l, they lrai,c sL l.rnitrcil online application c,nly on 11.09.2025. Thus. there is delii.,, ol l4 vcars in fi ling online application
5. In the, light ol the said discussion, this Vi it pstirion is disposcd of Cirecting the District Collector, Sanqa r, cddy t)istrict, st ric tly ln .t -=ffi respondent Nos.3 and 4 on notice. He shall consider the abnormal delay ol 14 years in filing the online application. He shall also consider that the subject properly is in urban area. lf the District Collector is not inclinccl to acccpt the rcquest rnade by the petitioners, he stratl assign specitrc reasons, pass a reasoned order and communicate the copv of the same to the petitioners. He shall complete the entire exercise within sixty (60) working days from the date of receipt of a copy of this ordcr. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous l.rctitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. * *.+ SD/.A.H.S. sl GOWRI SHANKAR TANT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER t, State of //TRUE COPY// To SA B
'1. The PrinciPal Secretary for Revenue Department' taria Telangana at Hyderabad The Manda I Revenue Officer, AmeenP ur Mandal, SangareddY District Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telanganaat Hvderabad. [OUT] 4 61,;"rc;; s'nisHnrru cHAND AHMED' Advocate [oPUC] 5 Two CD CoPies & * rr * o
i6 # ,, * # HIGH COURT DATED:24n912025
ORDER
WP.No.29278 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. e :r b- li i,rr ,e ( c (i( ,,.,1 .:/ (t- oo I i ll 0[I 2925 s * t i * \ * oL I