Telangana High Court
WP/29228/2025 of Nijayalakshmi R Pissay Vs The State of Telangana on 24 September 2025
IN rHE HIGH cotrTfff$Drffi;}rntrE.:t lt**GANA (sPecii oiigin'i''utisdiction) w ED N E S D *lT;Lt EXII'^RtsH[="fi\,?'*?= " = M B E R Between: Uii|,HIHJT;'ff hlit.$r;l'ixJri3i'(;$8io^?i"'iil""' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K'LAKSHMAN vears, occ ; Hguqq ColonY,
I
t 3168 I
IN rHE HIGH cotrTfff$Drffi;}rntrE.:t lt**GANA
(sPecii oiigin'i''utisdiction)
w ED N E S D *lT;Lt EXII'^RtsH[="fi\,?'*?= " =
M B E R
Between:
Uii|,HIHJT;'ff hlit.$r;l'ixJri3i'(;$8io^?i"'iil""'
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K'LAKSHMAN
vears, occ ; Hguqq
ColonY, Tirumalagtrt
.....PETITIONER
AND
l.TheStateofTelangana,.Fgp.byitsSecretary,DeptofRevenue,secretariat, r ' Hii"-tlo^.0, re]ang?na State'
2.TheDistrictCollector,YadadriBhuvangiriDistrict,TelanganaState.
3.TheRevenueDivisionalofficer,BhuvanagiriDivisionYadadriBhuvangiri oillrict, T elangana State'
4. The Tahasildar, chikatimamidi village, Bommalaramaram Mandal' Yadadri -' g'hrr*gi,i oisti'ict' Telangana State'
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or a direction, more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus directing the official respondents to pass orders on the grievance application filed in the Bhu Bharathi Portal in Revenue sadassulu vide Apptication No.300701 20004 dated 18-06-2025 and to be directed to make the necessary corrections in the Revenue Records and add the extent of land in Sy'No'731 of Ac.0-O2guntas which is missing and add Ac.0-03Gts in sy'No '732lRU for the existing Ac.o-3oguntas (issued new patta passbook) in the new patta passbook of the petitioner and issue new corrected patta passbook (new corrected patta passbook shoutd show Ac.0-02gts in sy.No.731 and Ac'0-33gts in Sy'No'732/RU)
i
it
ii
:l
\,
to the petitione
1":-orn,,;,';,J ;::HT:olericurturar rands in sy No r31 toan extent or sv No.732lRU k :il:::"":::tii0-2zsurtas ,:^ io,oo,and in situated at cnit;, an extent orn".o-sguntas out of Ac.
District 1"rrt*hir'timamidi
virr";,";33guntas
totaling to Ac.,-:3snrn,* ,,rrated at
-,xg;;';";',:*l;:',,::;,,.h;H"Tli"l,f
noa';vaoai"'nu'"'n"'
and 3go-A
",,n" jli*,ffi,,;' ";il;*ffi*r
',
*i,j#T
|.A.NO:1 OF 2025
.n" J:lff ",Jr::;,::i i,u, .,. prayins,ha direct ,n" "*j,lj,o.::^Yrt of the petirion, ,n" ,-'in the ciroumstances stated in rhe Bhu ,n.o""'
respondent" to p"rJ;;;";
"l",J"n
court mav be preased ro
;:::1 Ji :rt! H'ltriil ::';"""' i;i'r
srieva n ce a rlc I ica tio n ri red i n which i, mirril s and add the:cted to make tnt o"""ation No'3 oo7o12ooo4
3 osun ras r,..,# nlrril: ;::;;il f ;k,- i:::i ;: ffiA; ::
and issue,"-'::,""":,::t:1:;.:loo*, in the,"* r"l:i::,::jn illtH,;,i; show nc o-ozstsc;':;ii::ia Passbook (new corre for petitioners agricutturar rands ,n o"''-"gts in tr;:::#;i,:";H:r:r:"r::
she sotd o".o-ru].r",:" ^, j11t t1 sv'No.731 to an extent "r o" r.nrl, extent of Ac.0-, untas out or e"'o-zigu;;.;;r;ilextent or Ac'o-o2suntas (as chikatimam,., ,i,::::d#i,;::,T:x'-;nj1,1,,,,o in sy No ,,,,*,,o "n (erstwhire Nargonda .District), r",",'"'", Mandar, "J:T:1;il::T:rr,:j petition in the interest of equiry "rrrrl,llla state' pendins disposal Jr tne writ Counset for the petitioner : M/s. OM LAW FIRM
Counselfor the Respondents : SRt H.SOMAIAH, AGp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the fottowing ORDER
n
!
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT
TTTI
of2
ORAL ORI)ER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.Somaiah, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment.
2. According to the petitioner, she is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.0.02 guntas, as she sold 4c.0.25 guntas out of Ac.0.27 guntas, in the year 2004, in Sy.No.73l and Ac.0.33 guntas in Sy.No .732/RtJ situated at chikatimamidi village, Bommalaramaram Mandal, yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, under a registered sare deed bearing No.2025 of 20t04. In the rarest passbook Ac.O.[2guntas in Sy.No.73l is missing and Ac.0.03 guntas is shown less. In proof of the same, she has fired copies of ord and latest pattadar passbook and title deed. Therefore, there is wrong entry. She has submitted online application during Revenue Sadassu vide I.D.No-3,070120004, dated rg.06.2025, ro !
respondentNo.4witharequesttocorrectthesaidwrongentry.
Despitereceivingandacknowledgingthesaidapplication, respondent No'4 did not act upon the same' Aggrie'ved by the saidinactionofrespondentNo.4,petitionerfiledtlrepresent Writ Petition law.
3.Infact,petitionerhastosubmitonlineappticationtothe Competent Authority as specified under Schedule A of the TelanganaBhuBharathiRules,zozl(forshort.theRules,
7025)basingonthemarketvalueasmentionedinScheduleB
oftheRules,Zozsalongwithalttherelevantdocumentswith aspecificrequesttocorrectthesaidwrongentry.0nreceipt oftheSame,theCompetentAuthorityshallconsliderand disposeofinaccordancewiththeprocddurelaiddownunder
4.tntherightofthesaiddiscussion,thisWritPetitionts disposedofgrantinglibertytothepetitionertosubnritonline application along with alt the relevant docutnents to the CompetentAuthority'interrnsofBhuBharathiRules'2025
with a request to correct the aforesaid wrong entry, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. on receipt of the said online application, the competent Authority shall consider and dispose of the same, strictly in accordance with [aw, within a period of sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of the said online application. If the Competent Authority is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order and communicate a copy of the same to the petitioner.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
,ift's,';El?*"1H:ji.[rry:1,,]%,:,I,,"j]r:I!,Xi,S",]E'"
/
8,""'J?iifltr1:X?;;;iil; ;:-il'-fi:ffiff: 3' n;;*; EI,.t I
This amended ;;;;;;rliiulstitute the eartier order Which rras oeen arrJai'iiiJrlr"n"d on 0e-10 -zozs.
ISMAIL
REGTSTRAR
I
il
U
l1
//TRUE COPYII
o=f,ify8g&sJHl'*
l
I
To
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The secretarv. nenr nr pa.,^^..^ a sEcrloN oFFlcER ;, Im H{flffii,#fr1#*ffi-;"* il#;;:;,,,, ; iff t&tr"r€f ib fritrfrt$[ffi . ;; ff : J ffi ,:: : T Hyderabad. I
9. 9nu cc to ri1i. oivr LAW FIRM. ,or. rwo Cd dopiu. ' 'r r"" Advocate toPUcJ I G.IP
\ t HIGH COURT DATED:24l0912025 25t1012025 .:: k o --..--\ ,-..,.',.A i, t\ s$ ';'. c, AMENDED OR WP.No.29228 ot2025 i.l DISPOSING OF THE W'P WIHOUT COSTS. \\o rlal o 0ao t_L IE j::: \\ \'t \1 v{