Telangana High Court
WP/29078/2025 of Smt. K. Lalitha Vs The State of Telangana on 24 September 2025
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29078 OF 2025 [ 3168 ] ...PETITIONERS Between: 1. Smt. K Lalitha, Wo. Anjaiah, aged
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 29078 OF 2025
...PETITIONERS
Between:
1. Smt. K Lalitha, Wo. Anjaiah, aged about 56 years Occ Housewife, Rt/o. Flat Ultima Srija Residency, Behind Papadam's Kothapet, Saroornagar, rict
Z. 9.! Vas:rntha @ Md Azeema, D/o. Ramappa Aged about 50 years, Occ Lecturer Rl/o. Thungathurthi Village, Suryapet Districi
3. Smt. Dasari Shouramma, W/o. Rajasekhar Aged about 53 years, Occ Principal, TSWREIS, SLBC, Gandavarigudem, Nalgonda District.
No.203,
R.R.Dist
AND
1.
)
.7
The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.'
The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad The District Collector, Nalgonda District Nalgonda The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda District, Natgonda.
The Tahsildar, Nidamanur Mandal, Nalgonda District.
The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda District Nalgonda..
The Station House Officer, Nidamanur Mandal, Nalgonda District Tangirala Krishnaiah, S/o. late Muthaiah, Aged about 54 years, Occ Agriculture Rl/o. HNo,2-103/1 , S.C.Colony, Venigandla Village Nidamanuru Mandal, Nalgonda District -508 278
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or orders direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents, more particularly 5th and 7th Respondent who are not initiating any action on the representations dl.Z3rd and 28th August, August, 2O2S of the petitioners : take action against the Bth Respondent who is trying to dispossess the petil rrrers from assigned land to an extent of Ac.1-2O Guntas of agricultural land in l:r'l No.3Bg/53 situated at Nidamanur, Nalgonda District, in spite of having Decree i, n,1 Judgment passed in O.S.No.65 ol 2016 on the file of Honourable Junior Civil , rCge at Nidamanoor dated 2510212020 in favour of the deceased mother of the petitioners i.e, injunction order is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Princip r:s of Natural Justice and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Cons- tr- tion of lndia, and consequently direct the 5th and 7th respondents to considc- he representations dt. 23rd and 28th August, 2025 of the petitioners pending :risposal of the above W.P.
tA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 'l 51 CPC praying that in the r rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou 1 may be pleased to direct the 5th and 7th respondents to consider the represe rt,ltions dt. 23rd and 28th August, 2025 of the petitioners pending disposal of the rt,ove writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. P.SARITHA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1, 3 to 5: SRI L.RAVINDER
AGP FOR REVENIJI:
Counsel for the Respondent No.2, 6 & 7: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PE'IITION No.29078 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard leamed counsel lor the petitioners and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5.
2. The petitioners herein are seeking a direction to respondent No.4 to take action against respondent No.S, who is trying to dispossess them from the subject property. The petitioners' mother filed a suit in O.S. No.65 of 2016 before the Junior Civil Judge, Nidamanoor, against respondent No.8 and three others, seeking perpetual injunction. The said suit was decreed on 25.02.2020. Even then, respondent No.8 is interfering with the possession of the petitioners tn violation of the said order. Therefore, the petitioners submitted a representation dated 23.08.2025 to respondent No.5, with a request to take action against respondent No.8. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representatioq, respondent No.5 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.5, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
3. As discussed supra, if respondent No'8 violat :rl the decree and judgment dated 25.02.2020 in O.S. No' 65 o'2016, the petitioners ha\''e to avait the remedies available unr er law' They cannot submit a representation to respondent No'5 wi h a request to take action against respondent No.S on the groun'1 that he has violated the said judgment and decree and is interl :r ng with the possession of the petitioners over the subject prope 1) ' Therefore, they are not entitled to submit the said represental o I or file the present writ petition alleging non-consideration 'r' the same' Hence, the petitioners are not entitled to any relieL rrruch less the relief sought in the present writ petition, and the sa'r't: is liable to be dismissed.
4. Accordrngly, the writ petition is dismissed. H rv''ever, liberty is granted to the petitioners to pursue. their remr rlres available under law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pendinr , if any, shall stand closed. ,TRUE COPY' SD/.I.. JRINIVASA REDDY ,45,(ilSiTANT REGISTrylE l\\\, t $ecrtoru oFFlcER
1. One CC to [r/s P.SARITHA, Advocate IOPUC]
2. TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCou(fortheSateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OtJT] To,
- Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at {
Hyderabad [OUT]
4. Two CD CoPies r BSR BS tr:-- /
HIGH COURT DATED: 2410912025
ORDER
WP.No.29078 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS (+ \ 7Bm Lo \o 1) / ,,7t I / <ti \ ",/