Telangana High Court

WP/29207/2025 of Shri. U. Pavan Kumar Vs The State of Telangana on 24 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29207 OF 2025 Between: 1. Shri. U. Pavan Kumar, S/o Late U Rama Swamy,

I s168I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 29207 OF 2025

Between:

1. Shri. U. Pavan Kumar, S/o Late U Rama Swamy, Aged about 50 years, Occ ;Business, RJo. MurahariDoddi Mllage, l.G's Camp, Krishna Mandal, Narayanapet District, State of Telangana.

2. Smt. AttaluriNagamani, Wo. VenkataBasavaRao Aged about- 62, Occ; Agriculture, R/o. H-N.4-81, Kodali Road, Kanakayya Nagar, Mowa Village and Post, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh.

.....PETITIONERS

AND

1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Narayanpet District, State of Telangana.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narayanpet, Narayanpet Diskict, State of Telangana.

4. The Tahsildar, Krishna Mandal, Narayanpet District, State of Telangana.

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition'Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent is issuing the Notices of the Form IAND II, dated 03-09-2025, without applying his mind and contrary to their own records, as illegal and arbitrary and violative of article 14

and 21 of constitution of lndia, and consequently, and quash the same.

|.A.NO:1 OF 2025

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci 't umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of notices of the Form I AND ll, datec )3-09-2025, pending disposal of the main writ petition, in the interest of iustice.

Counset for the Petitioners : SRI RAMESH KATIKINENI

Gounsel for the Respondents : SRI H.SOMAIAH, AGP FOR I IEVENUE

The Court made the following ORDER

\

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION No.29207 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri H.Somaiah, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment.

2. Petitioners filed the present writ petition challenging the notices in forms - I and II, dated 03.09.2025 of respondent No.4. Perusal of the said forms would reveal that respondent No.4 has issued the forms with all blanks. He has not mentioned Village name, Mandal name or District etc. In the schedule, he has mentioned the name of the transferee i.e., Smt. U.Seshamma, Wo.Ramaswamy and also nature of transfer and date. Therefore, the impugned notices flre defective.

3. Sri H.Somaiah, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader I il for Assignment, fairly accepts the said fact.

2

4. Therefore, without going into merits and dr: nerits of the case, the impugned forms - I and II, dated 03.09. 1025, issued by respondent No.4 are set aside. However, liber y is granted to respondent No.4 to initiate fresh proceeding; against the petitioner, if so advised.

5. Accordingly, this Writ petition is dispose,J of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. t I . Sd/- (.BHAVANI SWAMY \$;11c1{rorB- 4 To SA PMK ?A- //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Departmen tLrir t Buildings, State of Telangana at Hyderabad

2. The District Collector, NaraYanpet District, State Telar 3ana. , Narayanpet, Narayanpe Distri ct, State of

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Telanoana.

a. i[JiEniirorr, Krishna Mandal, Narayanpet District, Stir : of Telangana' r;. i;; bt;6 dp Foi nssictlr',rerur, Hirin court for th<r State of Telangana at Hyderabad, IOUTI o Oi,"-CCio SRI RAMESH KATIKINENI, Advocate [OPL( ]

7. Two CD CoPies

P/. HIGH COURT DATED:24l0912025

ORDER

WP.No.29207 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. :7 ) ,') \ 1..,, 15 ,[[ [E - \-/\ :) q r\ % \ :t5 i\. i

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead