Telangana High Court
WP/28845/2025 of G. Suresh Babu Vs State of Telangana on 23 September 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 28845 0F 2025 years, colony, 1 G. Suresh Babu, S/o. Eshwari-ah, fge 61 years,
Between
[ 31681
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEIVBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 28845 0F 2025
years,
colony,
G. Suresh Babu, S/o. Eshwari-ah, fge 61 years, Rl/o.H.No. 1-4_1
.1 , Street No.
7, Habsiguda, Hyderabad - 500007 -
-
I S.qi Sfyqln, S/o G Vishweshwar Rao, aged 33 years, R/o. .1-8_50/3/13, Plot No. 11, Krishna Nagar colony, prenderghist road; Secunderabad.
G.Pufnachander Rao, S/o.G_Venkateswara Rao, aged 45
Occ.Business, Rl/o. 1-B-SO|3/13, plot No. t t, -kiisfrn5- ttagar Prenderghast road, Secunderabad.
G.Ravi Chandra, S/o:G.Vijay_ Kumar, aged about 42 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o.H.No. 1-4-1't , Street Nb.-2, HaOsiguO-a, ffyOeraOaO _ 500007
...PETITIONERS
State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
AND
2. Chief Commissioner of Land
Hyderabad.
Administration, Government of Telangana, 3, The collector and District tvagistrate, siddipet District (rVledak), Terangana State.
4. The Revenue Divisionar officer, Gajwer, siddipet District (rvedak), Terangana State.
5. The Tahsildar, [Vlulugu lVandal, Siddipet District, Telangana State.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of l\rrandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction (a) declaring the rejec;tion Apprication for passbook Data correctio n 2500044584
by the co'ector and District tulagistrate, siddipet District (rvedak), Terangana State as illegal and arbitrary (b) declaring the land of an extent of Ac..10-00 in Sy Nos.127i26, Ac.1_.19 guntas in Sy- No.127l3 0r E,andamairaran Vrrage, Murugu Mandar, siddipet District (Medak) is a private patta rand and that incrusion of the said rands in the rist of prohibited properties under Section 22-A of the Registration Act as iilegar, arbitrary, contrary t. the provisions of the Registration Act and viorative of Articre 300-4 of the Constituti,:n of lndia
(c) consequenfly direct the respondents to derete the said rand of an extent of Ac. 10-00 in Sy l:,os.127126 and Ac.1_19 guntas in Sy No..127l3 of Bandamailaran Village prohibited properties.
[\,4ulugu lvlandal, Siddipet District (Medak) from the tist of lA NO: 1 oF 2025
Petition under sr:ction 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in stupport of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the responderts herein to permit the petitioners to construct building/godown in their property of an extent of Ac.10-00 in Sy Nos.l27 /26, Ac.
1-19 guntas in sy No 1 27 r3 0f Bandamairaran Virage. [vurugu I\,4andar, Siddipet District (Medak); penrJing disposar of the above wnt petition Counsel for the petitioner: SRI p.BALAJI VARMA
counsel for the Respondents: sRr L.RAVTNDER, AGp FoR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
TITIi IIONOT]RABI,E SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHi\TAN
WRt'l'PETITION No.28845 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
I Ieard lcamcd counsel for the petitioners and Mr. L.Ravincler'. learr.red Assistant Govemment Pleader lor Revenue appearing firr the respondents
2. 'l'he I'etitioncrs hcrcin are clain.ring that they ale the absolute owners ancl possessors o f thc land admeasuring Ac. I 0-00 gts in Sy.No.l2712 (old No.l2716\, Ac.l-13 gts Sv.No. 127l-i and ln Ac.0-06 gts in Sy.No. l21l3E, total land admeasuring Ac. I l- l9 gts, situated at Bandamailararn Village, Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District. They have pulchased the subject property from freedom fighters
3. Referring to G.O.Ms.No. I I l0 dated 24.05.1960 and G.O.Ms.No.4i8 dated 24.03.1964, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that h'eedom lighters are entitled to alienate the property after completion of [0 years of assignment. Accordingly, they have alienated the subject property in favour of petitioners, on cornplction ol I0 yeals of assignment. Even then, the subject property is urentioned in the list of prohibited v properties. 't'herefbre, petitioncrs herein havc subrnitted online application l\o.2500044584, to the respondent No..l with a request to delete l.he subject propcrty fi'onr thc list of prol'ribited propcrties. He has re.rectcd the sarre,"r,ith ottc u'orcl "Rejectcd",
4. Pe rus;tl ol the said rc-iection order wotrld reveal that respondent \o.3 has re.iectcd the request made by the petitioner with one wc,rd "Rejected". It is not a l'easonecl older. No reasons were assigned Any order passed without reasons is an order passed without application of nrind and it is norl-est. Theretbre, the irnpugned rejection order is liable to bc sct asicle.
5. In vi<:w of the albrcsaicl cliscussions, rvitlrout going into merits and dernerits of the casc. this Writ I']etitiotr is disposed of, setting aside the impugned rc.jcction order and the matter is remanded brlck to thc 3''r t'esponclcnt with a dircction to consider the aforesairl online applicatron No.2500044-584 subrnitted by the petitioneL uith a specific requcst to deletc thc subject properly frorn t['re list of prohibited plope rlies aud pass apltropriate orders strictly in ac:cordance with lar,r, alicsh, by putting the petitioner on notice and alfording hinr an opportunity. Respotrdent No.3 shall consider 1l-rc aloresaid two (l.O's and also convct'sion proceedings dated I5.r')6.1992 of respondent No.5. IIc sliall also considcr the
\ To, BSR GJP order dated 08 10.2023 in W.P.No.4l295 of 2017 of this Court in respect of thc samc village. I{owever, he shall cornplete the said exercise within a pcriocl ol60 days fi-orn thc date of receipt of copy of this order. Therc shall bc no ordcr as to costs. As a sequel, rniscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/- C. DEEPIKA S TANT REGI //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER '1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Se tariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana
2. The chief commissioner of Land Administration, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.
3. The collector and District trilagistrate, Siddipet District (Medak), Telangana State.
4. The Revenue Divisional officer, Gajwel, siddipet District (Medak), Telangana State.
5. The Tahsildar, tr/ulugu Mandal, Siddipet District, Telangana State'
6. One CC to SRI P.BALAJI VARI!{A' Advocate [OPUC] T.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT]
8. Two CD CoPies
L. HIGH COURT DATED:2310912025 ii ..-) t,r) 1I nH :i:ii -.,.
ORDER
WP.No.28845 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS t. o d K \