WP/28814/2025 of Motala Bhagyalaxmi Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2025

[ 31681

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 28814 OF 2025

Between:

1. Motala Bhagyalaxmi, Wo. Late Motala Gangaram, Aged about 54 years, Occ:

Housewife,

2. Motala Devendar Raju, S/o. Late Motala Gangaram, Aged about 22 yea$, Occ: Student, Both residents of H.tlo.17-29, Near Someswara Temple, Chennur Town, Mancherial Dislrict, T.G. - 504201.

...PETITIONERS No.1 & 2

AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secreta riat, Hyderabad, T.G.

2. The Chief Commiss'roner of Land Administration, Revenue Department, Government of Telangana, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad, T.G.

3. The District Collector, Mancherial District, T.G.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial Division, Mancherial District, T.G.

5. The Tahsildar, Chennur Mandal, Mancherial District, T.G.

6. The Sub-Registrar, Mancherial District, T.G.

7. The Municipal Commissioner, Chennur Municipality, Mancherial District, T.G.

B. Badikela Venkatesh, S/o. B.Banaiah, Aged about 49 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.8-12, Sri Nagar Colony, Chennur Town, Mancherial District, T.G. - 504m1 .

...RESPONDENTS No.1 to 8

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction:

(i)

Declaring the mutation of land originally clas s Government Land in Sy.No.869/5, admeasuring Ar:

Chennur Village and Mandal, Mancherial District, Sy. No.869/7 after unauthorized conversion to non-ag name of unofficial Respondent No.8, as illegal, arb t void ab initio, being in violation of the Telanga r (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 and contrary to l€

(ii) Declare the conversion of the said land from i agricultural use (NALA) as null and void, and withoJ

land is assigned government land not eligible for sur the Telangana Agricultural Land (Conversion f Purposes) Act, 2006,

(iii) Direct the official Respondents to cancel the pa I

conversion in the name of unofficial Respondent lr r classification of the land as Assigned Land t admeasuring Ac.3.23gts, in all official records inclul portal,

(iv) Direct the official Respondents to mutate the said l€

the legal heirs of the original assignee (now decease possession and succession, after conducting verification as per law,

(v) Direct the official Respondents to include Survey Nc in the list of prohibited properties under Section 22- a Act, 1908, to prevent any further transactions, registr of the subject land,

(vi) Direct Respondent No.6 (Sub-Registrar, Chennur)

register any document of sale, gift, mortgage, lei relating to the subject land,

(vii) Direct Respondent No.7 (Municipal Commissioner, ()l any building permits, layout approvals, or c permissions in respect of the subject land,

(viii) Restrain the unofficial Respondent No.8, or any pers;(

him, from interfering with the peaceful possession ar lfied as Assigned 3.239ts, situated at rnd now shown as 'icultural use, in the 'ary, fraudulent and a Assigned Lands gricultural to non- lurisdiction, as the h conversion under rr Non-Agricultural r entry and NALA

.7, and restore the

nder Sy.No.869/5,

ng the Bhu Bharati

rd in the names of

d), based on lawful

lue enquiry and

s. 869/5 and 869/7

of the Registration

ations or alienation

1ot to entertain or

se or conveyance

rennur) not to grant

.her development

n claiming through

J enjoyment of the

-1?

Petitioners over the subject land, and from alienating, encumbering, or altering the nature and character of the land.

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to maintain the status quo in all respects without affecting the Petitioners possession, rights, and title concerning the subject land in Sy.No.B69i5

(now shown as Sy.No.869/7), admeasuring Ac.3.23gts, situated at Chennur Village and Mandal, Mancherial District.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MACHA SAI KRISHNA

Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE

Counsel for the Respondent No.6: GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION

Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI P. KRISHNA REDDY, S.C. FOR MUNICIPALITIES

Counsel for the Respondent No.8: -

The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRTJUSTICE K. LAKSHM N

WRIT PETITION No.28814 OF 202:i