Telangana High Court
WP/28886/2025 of Madasu Kanukameri Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN Between: Madasu Kanukamerj, Wo Lurdu Raju, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.H No 2 161/1 , Church Road, Koutala Village and ltlandal, Kumuram Bheem
;./
t 3168'l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Between:
Madasu Kanukamerj, Wo Lurdu Raju, Aged about 45 years, Occ.
Agriculture, R/o.H No 2 161/1 , Church Road, Koutala Village and ltlandal, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Telangana State Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kagaznagar Division, Kagaznagar, Koutala Mandal, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District.
4. The Tahsildar, Koutala Mandal, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District.
5. Naitham Bajirao. S/o. Bheema. Aged about 40 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.
Mogadadhaat Village, Koutala Mandal, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Artrcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of IvIANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly Respondent No.4 in summonang the petitioner to the office at the behest of Respondent No.5 for the agricultural land to an extent of Ac.2-29 guntas in Sy.No. 2912, Ac 2-29 Gts in Sy.No 29/2/1, total land to an extent of Ac. 5-'19
Gts situated at Koutala Village and lvlandal, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No.4 not to call petitioner to the office
q
+
+
t
i
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTE]VIBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
WRIT PETITION NO: 28886 OF 2025
I
i
-----7
n
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the (:rrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Corrfi may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 not to call the petitione| o the office, pending disposal of the writ p,etition Counsel for the Fetitioner : SRl. ALLAPURAM SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent's No.'s 1 TO 4: SRl. L. RAVIN DER LEARNED
ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No. 5 :
The Court made the fcllowing: ORDER
a
+
*
d
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
2.
The petitioner herein is claiming that she is the absolute owner and possessor o I land admeasuring Ac.2-2960 gts ln Sy.No.2912 and Ac.2-2960 gts ltl Sy.No.29l2/1, total land admeasuring Ac.5- 1920 gts, situated at Koutala Vitlage and Mandal, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District. ln proof of the same, in possession of the subjcct propefiy. There is a standing crop of cotton. Even then, at thc instance of respondent No.5, respondent No.4 is summoning the petitioner. Challenging the said action of respondent No.4, petitioncr tlled the present writ petition.
3.
Sri L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions would submit that respondent No.4 never summoned the petitioner as alleged in the writ affidavit.
I
WRIT PE'II]'ION No.28{186 of 2025
ORAL OR-DER:
she has filed copy of latest pattadar passbook and title deed. She is \.r- _. - ',1
4.
Though the petitioner contended that resprtndent No.4
summoned the petitioner, she has not mentioned the date, time and the details olthe said summoning.
5. In the light of the aforesaid submissions nrade by Sri
L. Ravinder, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader. lbr Revenue, the grievance of the petitioner is redressed. Accord ngly, this writ petition is clos,:d. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a serluel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed SD/-c,. SRINIVASA REDDY
AS:;ISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Dr. B. R Ambedkar Telangana State Secretarrat, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District
3. The Revenue Ilivisional Officer, Kagaznagar Division. l(agaznagar. Koutala Mandal, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District.
4. The Tahsildar, Koutala Mandal, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District.
5. Naitham Balirao, S/o. Bheema, Aged about 40 years. Ccc. Agriculture, R/o.
Mogadadhaat ',/illage. Koutala Mandal, Kumuram Bheem Asifabad District.
6. One CC to SRI ALLAPURAM SRINIVAS Advocate [Ol)LJC]
7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana.
tourl
8. Two CD Copie;
I
G
o
T
f
a
t
MBC
BS
s
a
+
HIGH COURT
DATED:23i09/202s
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.28886 of 2025 WRIT PETITION IS CLOSED WITHOUT COST + ,-) o k (^, \ t r $ t .$' a a<o tr- ,{' *
It l{ U \r I t\?\ ,,;J I I I