Telangana High Court

WP/29033/2025 of Jilkapally Suvarna Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

kapa H.No 2- [3168 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29033 OF 2025 Between: uvarna, Wo. J.Malla Reddy, Aged

J

ys kapa

H.No 2-

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEIVIBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 29033 OF 2025

Between:

uvarna, Wo. J.Malla Reddy, Aged about 59 Years, Occ. Housewife, R/o , Uppal, tVledchal- Malkajgiri District.

.,.PETITIONER

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep By its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

The District Collector, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, At Anthaipally Village, S hamirpet Mandal, Medchal- tr,4alkajgiri District.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Keesara Division, At Keesara Village and Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District.

The Tahsildar, Ghatkesar Mandal, At Ghatkesar Village and Mandal, Medchal -Malkajgiri District.

The Bhoodan Yagna Board, Rep by its Chairman, 2nd Floor, Bhoparipalan Buildings, CCLA, Abids, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under A(icle 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly that of respondent No.2 and 3 not correcting the entry in revenue records, reflecting the subject land as Bhoodan Land, correcting it to patta land of the petitioner inspite of repeated represented is challenged in this Writ Petition as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents more particularly respondent No.2

and 3 to remove the land admeasuring Ac.4-00 in Sy.No.1078P situated at

I

Edulabad Village, Cihatkesar Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District reflecting as Bhoodan Land from Dharani Portal/ Bhu Bharathi and record the same as patta land of the petitioner.

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly respondent No.2 and 3 to record the land admeasuring Ac.4-00 in Sy.No.1078P situated at Edulabad Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District as patta land of the petitioner ignoring the claim of the respondr;nt No.5 in Dharani Portal/ Bhu Bharathi.

Counsel for the Pr-'titioner : SRI VIJAY B PAROPAKARI

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI H.SOMAIAH Frff:ilfl:*,, The Court made the following: ORDER

1'lIE llON'BLE SRI JUSTICII K. LAKSIIN{Ah\

Ilearcl learned counsel filr the pctitioner ancl Mr. H.Sornaialr Ezra Sastri, learned Assistant Government Pleadel lbl Assignrnenl

2.

I)etitioner herein is claiming that she is the absolute owner ancl posscssor ot' larrtl adnreasuring Ac.i.20 guntas ancl Ac.0.20

guntas in S1,.No. l07fiP, situaled at Edulabad Village, Ghatkesar Marrtlal, Medchal- Malka jgiri District. on the strength ol registeretl sale deeds lrrlt,docuurcnt bearing Nos.3558/1994 and 1004/1998.

I le l narnc u'as also nrutatcd in rcvenue record and old pattadar passbook and titlc dccd rvas also issued in her favour. In proolol'

thc sarne. shc has [ilcd copics ol the said sale deed, old pattadar passtxrok and title deed, etc. She has submitted rvlitten represcntatiou, datcd 17.09.2025 to respondent Nos.2 to 4 with a request to includc her narre in Bhu Bharathi Poftal and issue e- pattadar passbook. I)espite receiving and acknowledging thc said writtell represcntation, respondent Nos.2 to 4 did not act I

\VRll' PETII-ION No.29033 of 2025

ottAl- oRDEri:

I

upon tlle same. Agr.rricvc(l []y thc said inaction of respondeut Nos.2 to.l. pctitioner tilcd thc presellt Writ Pctition

3.

Perrrsal ol' thc rccolcl also would re\/ea[ that when responclenl No.4 is clairning thc said propert), pctitioncr filed a writ pctition llric W.P.No.lli7l of 2007 arrrl the same was allowed. I he said tact is specitically nrcntioned in Paragraph No.5 ol' tlre rvrit aflldavit. l Iou,cver. ltctitiorrcr has to subrnit onlinc application to the ('onrpelcnt Authorill' as specified in Schedulc ,\ of Bhu Blrar-athi I{ulcs. 2025 lrasirrg on tlie market value n:cntionecl in Schcdulc B ol' Bhu Bharathi Rulcs. 2025

along w itr all the rclevant docurnents, witlr a request to include licr rtamc in Bhu l-]harathi Portal and issue c-pattadar passhook and the Courpctcllt Authority shall consider and dispose ol'tltc sarnc strictly in accordancc lvith the proccdure laid ilon n ,rndcr lar.v.

4.

In the light of'the saicl discussion, this Writ Pctition is disposed ol'granling Iibcrty to the pctitioner to suburit online application in terurs ol BItu Bharathi Rules to tl-re Competent -='---I--- I

-\&l

__=l

Authority along with all the relevant documents within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order with a specific request to include her name in Bhu Bharathi Portal and issue e-pattadar passbook. On receipt of the said online applir:ation, Competent Authority shall consider and dispose of the same by putting the petitioner and respondent No.5 on notice and affording them an opportunity.

If the Competent Authority is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioncr,, he shall assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order and communicate a copy of the same to the within a period of sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of the said online application.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, Pshall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

//TRUE COPY//

. SREENIYASA REDDY

SISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

To,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. e of Telangana, t

The District Collector, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, At Anthaipally Village, Shami rpet l\rlandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Keesara Division, At Keesara Village and Mandal, lVledchal- Malkaigiri District.

4. The Tahsildar, Ghatkesar Mandal, At Ghatkesar Village and Mandal, I\uledchal -Malkajgiri District.

petitioner. However, he shall complete the said exercise q

\ The Chairman, Bhoodan Yagna Board, 2nd Floor, Bhoparipalan Buildings, CCLA, Abids, Hyderabad. One CC to SRI VIJAY B PAROPAKARI, Advocate. [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR ASSIGNMENT, High Court for the State of Telangana tourl Two CD Copies. BSK 4y

HIGH COUR'I' DATED:2310912025 ',,:,'.-i !.... 15 ![I ro5 1/ I

ORDER

WP.No.290;33 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \D

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead