Telangana High Court

WP/29234/2025 of Smt. Raheema Begum Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE Aged about Nagar, Plot [ 3168 I 42 yeats, No. 983. PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO:29 234 0F 2025 Between: 1. Smt. Raheema

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEIVBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

Aged about

Nagar, Plot

[ 3168 I

42 yeats,

No. 983.

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO:29 234 0F 2025

Between:

1. Smt. Raheema Begum, W/o' tr/lD Rafiq-' Aged.about 36 vears' Occ Housewife R/o. Ftat No. 205, rcJiitr,L',in'patmtnj, r<it itiva Nagai, Chintal, Qutballapur, tVledchal-lvlalkajgiri District.

2. Naveema Begum, Wo. lr'4ohammed MohsinParvez Aoed about 36 years'

ocb. Housewite nyo." u.rtr"o.s-'ifi56/Bl5, Anurag Col6ny Langer House'

Golconda, HYderabad.

3. Safiounissa, W/o. Liyakhanth Ali Khan, Aged about 42 yearc' Occ Housewife " Htl;.i,6. 3r_)iotsji, indiri Nigrr, Atwai, Medchal-Malkajsiri District.

4. I\/ahaiabeen, W/o. Mohammed Abdul _Rasheecl Aoed about 38 years.

- 6;;.ii;;ilir" - nvo'.'"""'ii.ilo. --- o:iz+rtrs, -DP Pochampallv'

Dommarapochampatiyl c"niim-rtsr*mr, Dundigal, tVledchal-$/lalkajgiri District.

5. Sved Khaia, S/o. Syed Wahab, Aged a.bout 37 years' Occ'Labour Rl/o ,H No'

" T6?zoelFlrr,ath (Jg-ai' Daotier.duo, Kaiwanja' charminar' Hvderabad'

6. Shahmeem Begum, Wo. tvlohammed Khadeer. Aoed about 42 years' Occ'

Housewife nyo. n uo.'"a-i-i+0, ch.ri Nagar 'old" Bowenpally, Balanagar, tvledchal-Malkajgiri District'

7. Mohammed Rafiq, S/o. Mohammed SabullahHussain' Aoed about 42 years'

occ. Vendor nl/o. rruirli')b3: G;t[9; Apartment' Kakativa Nagar' Chintal'

Qribrtt"prr, Medchal-tvlalkajgiri District'

8. Ivlohammed Anwar Khan,

Occ.Labour Fl/o. H.No.

ReddY.

Aoed about 45 Years'

SErilingamPallY, Ranga

S/o. Late. MD Khan'

1-15712, Chandanagar,

I

Yasmeen Begum, W/o. Ir/ohd Aijaz.-Ahmed', oii.uors"wiid R/o. H.No. 7-1-28111N30, Leeta Ameerpet, HYderabad'

l0.Farzanakathun, W/o.

Occ.Housewife Rl/o.

District.

Livakhath Ali

H Nb.31-210/9/1 ,

11.lv1D Safiva Bee, W/o. Ivlohammed Mahaboob' Aged aboLl!

" 6;.;#r; mi,.'n.rtro. o-sbil1, s.ailogia. colonv, DommaraP

6inO-iruiirrra, Medchal-lt/lalkajgiri District'

l2.Shahnaz Begum, W/o. MdAfzalHussain' Aged about 31 years'

'' Hi;' iiii". d-1- i)si +s Aa, i ousuf g ud a, Khairtabad' Hvd e ra bad'

Khan,

lndra

Aged

Nagar,

about 42 Years'

Medchal-Malkajgiri

38 years,

ochampallY,

Occ.Labour

I

I

I

I

i

I

I

I

I

'1 3'shaik lqrtyai, sfo ShaikMahmood, Aged about 32 years, occ.Labour RUo.

H.No. B-2-oB2t32t1B1, Sri Ram N-agai,--einJrA--Hiil.,--XfrrIrJtrUIX, Hyderabad.

14' tMohammed AIi, S/o. Mohammed Sad ukkahH ussain, Aged about 45 vears.

occ.Erectrician R/o H No. 12-2-42 and 91t2rB F.r.r, sob,'wrrir""iiri#tdiibi, lVuradAsil Nagar, Hyderabad.

'1 5.lvohammed Jahangeer,. s/o. IVrohammed Khadeer, Aged about 30 vears.

occ,. carpen er Rrol r ruo,. a_z r4o,-GhoiiNl'sii ori 6;;;.;;ii;'3fifi;;?; I\,4edcha l-[4a l<a jgiri District.

16.Jawad Khan, S/o. Jalal Mia,Aged about 34 years, Occ. painter R/o. H.No. 1_

14-17I/2, Anbedkar Nagar, Ba-tamrai, Secun'deiabaO, ff yOeiaOaO.

17.Abdul Rawoof, S/o. Irrrohammed rsmair, Aged about 32 years, occ. Driver R/o.

B;lii"]1-13.141t1,

prabhakar Reddy Nisir, ElJrn"g'"i, rvieoir,"i:nr"irlj;gi,i

18. Mohammed r\rtaf Hussain, s/o MohdKhaderHussain, Aged about 40 vears.

Occ.. ,Carpt:rter R/o. . H.No. tz_z-eiitNi,- -V;i ;iil;-"R;;r- d;:;;:

Talabchanchir am. Charminar. Hyderabad.

..PETITIONERS

AND

The state 'rf r-eranoana. Rep by its principar secretary, Revenue Department, Secreta riat. Hydera-'bad.

The District C r I lector, l\,4edchal-tVa lkajg iri District.

The Tahsildar. Dundigar Gandimaisamma r\irandar, Ir,4edchar-rr,4arkajgiri District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances state:d in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue ary writ order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of L4andamus ':ecraring high handed action of the respondents No.3 and its official in interfering; with the peacefur possession of the petitioners over the schedule property i.e., land admeasuring gO Sq yds each in Sy No 120/42

situated at Dommara pochampary virage, Dudigar Gandimaisamma Mandar, Medchar-Marakajigiri District, is iilegar, arbitrary and u nconstitutionar and consequen y direct'.he respondent No.3 not to interfere with the possession and demolish the structures raised over the schedure property i.e., rand admeasuring 80 Sq Yds each ir Sy No 12Ot42 situated at Dommara pochampally village, Dudigal Gandimarsamma [\rrandar, Medchar-Marakajigiri District, pursuant to the patta certificate dt 2-10-2023.

q!!

lA NO: I oF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto issuelnterimdirectionstotherespondentsNo2anditsofficialsnottointerfere withthepossessionofpetitionersanddemolishthestructuresraisedoverthe schedule property i-e., land admeasuring B0 Sq' Yds each in Sy' No 120/42

situated at Dommara Pochampally village' Dudigal Gandimaisamma Mandal'

Medchal-lvlalakajigiri Dirict. pending disposal of the writ petition'

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L'RAVINDER' AGP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following: ORDER

- ,. Ji.:: -*tiE'f

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

\[RIT PETITION No.29234 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri L. Ravin dcr , iearned Assistan t Government pleader for Revenue, appraring for respondent Nos. 1 to 3

2. Petitioners are eighteen (18) in number. They are in possession of their respective plots i.e., BO Sq.yds in Sy.No.12O/42, situated at Dommara pochampally Village, Dundigal (lzrrLrlimaisamma Mandal, Meclchal_Malkajigiri District. Thr:y 'ave also liled certificates of transl-er/ mutation and assignment patta for land under possession as per terms of G.O.Ms.No.li8, dated 31.12.2014. According to leaned counsel, the petitioners have constructed small houses/rooms Ln the saicl plots ancl they are in possession o[ the same. It.vcn though respondent No.3 is trying to dispossess the petitioners from the said property without folloi,r,ing clue procedure laid down under law and attempted to demolish the said structures. Challenging the said action of the responC.,:nt No.3, petitioners filed the present Writ Pe t it ion. i l I

W.P.No.29234 of 202

3. Whereas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for assignment produced written instructions of respondent No'3, stating that petitioners land in Sy.NO'12O/42, situated at Dommara Pochampally Village and the - petitioners have encroached into the land in Sy.No.120/ 1 and they are trying to proceed with the construction in the land in Sy'No'l2Oll' They have not obtained any permission from the authorities concerned for construction of the said houses The said written instructions placed on record' 4 . Aforesaid contentions would reveai that there is a dispute with regard to identification of the said property' According to the petitioners, their property is in Sy.No.120/42, situated at Dommara Pochampally Village' and according to respondent No.3, petitioners are trying to encroach the land in Sy.No. i20/ 1 which is the Government land. Total extent of land in Sy'No' l2O of Dommara Pochampally Village is Government land' Therefore' considering the said fact only, respondent No'2 has issued assignment patta for the lar-rd under possession in terms of G.O.Ms.No.58, dated 30-12-2014 read with G'O'Ms'No'14 d,ated, 74.02.2022. Respondent No'3 has to conduct survey

KL,J W.l'.No.29234 of 2025 -) and dema rr: a te the land belongs to the petitioners in S,y.No.12Ol 411 by fixing thc bounclaries and lancl in Sy.No. 120/ 1 of the very same village, strictlv rn accordance u,ith lau., b1, putting the petitioners and zrll interested parties on notice and affording them an opportunity.

5. In thr: light of the said discussion, this writ petition is disposecl of rlirecting respondent No.3 to conduct slrrvey and demerrc:rte the propcrty of the petitioners in Sy.No. l2O /4.1 and the Government land in Sy.No. l2O / I of Dommarapoc.rampally Village, Dundigal Gandimaisamma Mandal, Me.d,:ha1-Malkajigiri District, strictly in accordance with the proc:r:dure laid down under 1aw, by putting the petitioners arLcl all interested parties on notice and afforcling them an oltp,rtrtunity within a period of hfteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then respondent |,lo.3 is directed not to dispossess the petitioners tiom the said property. At the same time, the petitioners €rr(: directed not to make any fresh construction of the aforesaid property. There shall be no order as to I t costs t

W.P,No,29234 of 202 .: ..t

:j To,

BSR GJP Asa sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any' pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed' SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The PrinciPal Secretary, of Telangana. Revenue DePartment, S ariat, HYderabad, State

2. The District Collector, Medchal-Matkajgiri District.

3. TheTahsildar,DundigalGandimaisammatr/landal,Medchal-tvlalkajgiriDistrict.

4. One CC to SRI RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI' Advocate IOPUCI

5. Two CCs to GP FoR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD CoPies

HIGH COURT DATED:2310912025

ORDER

WP.No.29234 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS ( ?

-.:-"':'.:-:-,. (il.- -; /i''-t\- ' J ..'' r. ".tt'..: \i a1\ B [tT 2925 , j : li . " ..,/ .- _._t. ti.\ i. .r-,. a _: ::_ _ -_ - -_r2- l ) \ t q r [0

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead