Telangana High Court
WP/28901/2025 of Dasari Vittal Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 28901 OF 2025 Between: AND 1 Dasari Vittal, S/o- D. Sailu, Aged about 49
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 28901 OF 2025
Between:
AND
Dasari Vittal, S/o- D. Sailu, Aged about 49 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o.
H No.3-95i7, Vattinagulapally Village, Rajendernagar l\,,landat, Ranga Reddy District-
...PETITIONER
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept., Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hydera6ad.
The Collector, Ranga Reddy District, lntegrated District Office Complexes, Kongara Kalan Village, Kongara Kalan, Ranga Reddy District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendernagar Division, Ranga Reddy District.
The Tahasildar / The Mandal Revenue Officer, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
The Sub-Registrar of Stamps and Registrations, Stamps a Registrations Dept., Kanchi Gachibowli Road, Vattinagulapally, Ranga Reddy Distiict.
Dasari Jagan, S/o. D. Sailu. Aged about 44 yearc, Occ . Agriculture, R/o, H,No. 3-96, Vattinagulapally Village, Rajendernagar lr,4andal, Ranga Reddy District.
Dasari Pentamma, Wo. late Dasari Sailu, Aged about 60 years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o. 3-96, Ambedkar Circle, Vattinagulapally Village, Ranga Reddy District.
Gera Amrutha, Wo. G. Narsing Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ . Housewife, Wo.1A-7-8461147, Gowlipura, Mahakali Chicken Center, Gowlipura, Mekalamandi, Near Charminar Old City, Near Lal Dawaza, Aliabad Et Uppuguda, Hyderabad.
Kondakala Kalamma, Wo. Sriramulu, Aged Et Occ not known to the Petitioner, R!to. Bakaram Village, Near Shivalayam Temple, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
J
t)
o
I
10. Muthyalu, W/o. Madhu, Aged not known to the Petit < rer, Occ. Housewife, R/o., H.No. L4andal Ward No-17 of the GHtvlC, Chr npapet Village, Near Daggads Point, Hyderabad.
..RESPONDENTS
petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of Inrii circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particula-l Writ of Mandamus, declaring the actron of the Unofficial trying to mutate their names or any third party names into t in respect of share of the Petitioneis Agriculture Land admr:; in Sy.No. 375 and 456/A,4 situated at Vattinagu lapally Villar Ranga Reddy District as illegal and arbitrary action and (
direction, directing the Respondent No.4 nol appl cation/rep res en tation lor mutation of any third party n ]
Records in the said Petitioner's Agriculture Land admeasur Sy.No.375 and 456/,4,4 situated at Vattinagulapally Villa,y Ranga Reddy District and further direct the Official R:
consider the Petitioner Representation Dt. 1O.03.2O2a Respondents No.2 to 4 requesting the said Respondents f name into the Revenue Records of the Petitioner shi admeasuring Ac.2-O2 Gts., in Sy.No.375 and 456/44 situa:r Village, Gandipet N4andal, Ranga Reddy Distflct forthwith.
l praying that in the
High Court may be
r one in the nature of
Rescondents herein
re Revenue Records
su ring Ac. 2-02 Gts.,
e, Gand ipet Mandal,
cnsequently issue a
.o entertain any
ne into the Revenue
ng Ac. 2-02 Gts., in
:, Gandrpet l\,4andal,
;pondents herein to
submrtted to the
)r not to mutate any
'e Agriculture Land
d at Vattinagulapally
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section '15'1 CPC praying that in the c r )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour may be pleased to grant lnterim Direction, directing the Registering Authorit,r i.e- Sth Respondent herein not to entertain any documents submitted by the Lr cfficial Respondents herein for mutation of names into the Revenue Records with regard to the Petitioner share Agriculture Land admeasuring Ac.2-02 Ct ;., in Sy.No.375 and 456/4,4 situated at Vattinagulapally Village, Gandipet IV1€ 1dal. Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of ustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKAT PRASAD UKKALAM
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. RAV|NDER, AGp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE IC LAK I I{MAN
WRIT PETITION No.28901 of 202!i
oRAL ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for thc petitioner and l\l learned Assistant Government l'leader for Revenue ap1
respondents.
2.
According to the petitioner, his father, late DrLr the absolutc os,ner and possessor of land admeasurinp Sy.Nos.375iE,l: and 456/.44., situated at Vattinaguia Gandipet Mandal, Itangareddy District. Petitioner lr vidE O.S.No 633 of 2022 against his father and re; seeking perrnanent injunction. The said suit is pendir pendency of the said suit, respondent Nos.6 to 10, l i sisters are fi]'ing to obtain mutation proceedings in res property rvithout putting the petitioner on notic:
affording him an oppoftunity. ln paragraph No.6 of tl t petitioner has specifically stated that the subject prr partitioned by his father. Therefore, petitioner ha representation dated 10.03.2025 to respondent Nos.
request not to entertain any application submitted Nos.6 to l0 for mutation of the subj ect property.
petitioner filed the present writ petition.
. L.Ravinder,
earing for the
ari Sailu was
\c.2-02 gts in
;atl1, Village,
s filed a suit
rondent No.6,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. During the r brothers and rect of subject and without writ affidavit, rerty is orally ; submitted a Ito4witha ry respondent Iherefore, the
Though the petitioner is contending that he has submifted the aforesaid representation to respondent Nos.2 to 4, he has not fited proof of service of the said representation on the respondent Nos.2 to
4. Without filing proof of service, he cannot file the present writ petition alleging non-consideration of the said representation. Therefore, petitioner herein is not entitled for ariy relief much less relief sought in the present writ petition. This writ petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, it is dismissed. However, liberry is granted to petitioner to submit online application to respondent Nos.2 to 5, with a requcst not to entertain any application submittcd by respondent Nos.6 to 10, seeking succession, mutation proceedings and issuance of E-Pattadar passbook in respect of subject property without putting the petitioner on notice and without affording him an opportunity and it is for the respondent Nos.2 to 5, to consider the same and dispose it of in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed' 'd/-K'BHA,ANI swAMY SISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to SRl. VENKAT PRASAD UKKALAM Advo One CC to SRI L. RAVINDER, Advocate [OPUC] TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE'HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana lourl Two CD CoPies PVL (Y loPUCl
PMK
- - =;;.S
HIGH COURT DATED:2310912025
ORDER
WP.No.28901 ot 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS -\ r1[iC ffi i t1 1..t *{d +&*