WP/29068/2025 of Poreddy Narendar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

NO:29068 OF 2o2s

...PETITIONER

WRIT P

Between:

Poreddy Narendar Reddy,

Retired Teacher, Ri/o H.

Karimnagar District.

S/o Late Gopaiah,

No.2-55, Baddipalli

Aged about 62 years, Occ:

Village, Kothapalli Mandal,

AND

1.

2.

a

4.

5.

6.

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

The District Collector, Karimnagar District.

The District Registrar, Karimnagar District.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar Division, Karimnagar District.

The Tahsildar-cum-Sub-Registrar, Kothapalli Mandal, Karimnagar District.

Chinthapalli Shankar Rao, S/o Gopal Rao, Aged about 60 years, R/o H.No.9- 9-29, Ramnagar, Kothapalli Mandal, Karimnagar District. Adikmet, Ramnagar Gundu, Adikmet, Hyderabad. Mobile. 855591 1620.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 and 5 in not considering the petitioner representation dated 11lgl2o25 and not disposing the petitioner representation seeking action against the 3RD and Sth respondents by illegal registration of the petitioner assignment Agriculture land (prohibited property) to an extent of Ac.5.00 gts in sy.No.98 situated at Baddipaili vilage, Kothapalli Mandal, Karimnagar District, registered to the 6th respondent is hig-hly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of principles of naturai justice and Itso in violation of Articles '14 and 300-4 of the constituiion of lndia ,rio "onr"qr"r,rrv direct the respondent No.3 and 5 to consider the petitioner representation dated 111812025,and dispose of it by taking action against the respondent No.3 and s lA NO: 1 OF 202s Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 and 5 to consider the petitioner representation dated 111812025 and to dispose the petitioner representation, by taking action against the respondent No.3 and 5 in respect of the petitioner assignment Agriculture land (prohibited property) to an extent of Ac.5.00 gts in Sy.No.98 situated at Baddipalli Village, Kothapalli Mandal, Karimnagar District pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KALVALA SANJEEV

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: SRI H. SOMAIAH EZRA SHASTRI, ASST. GP FOR REVENUE

Counsel for the Respondent No.6: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

IVRIT PETITION No.29068 of 2025

ORAL

RDER:

I-leard learned counsel fbr the petitioner attd Sri H.Sornaiah Ezra Shastri, learned Assistant Government Pleader fbr Assignmetrt.

2.

Accorcling to the petitioner, ltis tnaternal grandlather ltas executed Sada Bainarna, dated 19.04.1961, in respect of the land aclureasurins Ac.5.00 guntas in Sy.No.98 situated at Baddipalli Village, I(othapalli Mandal, Karrninagar District The said property is mentioned in list of prohibited properties Even then, respondent No.5 has entertained a registered sale deed ol' respondent No.6 in respect of the albresaid subject property. l-hcrcfirrc. petitioner has subrnitted a reprcsentatiorr datecl I 1.08.2015 to respondent No.2 with a request to take action against rcsponclent No.6. Despite recciving attd acknowlcdging the saicl application, respondent No.2 did not

act upon the salne. Aggrieved by the said inaction of responclent No.2, petitioner trled the present Writ Petition.

3.

'T'hough the petitiorter ltas contetrded that petitioner's grandfather cxecuted thc albrcsaid Sada Bainama, dated I 9.04. I 9(r [ , he ltas trot Ii lcd regularization proceedings obtained by his grarrdtatltcr" uttdcr Section 5(A) of the ROR

Act anrl l3(B) proceeclirtgs. "thc said Sada Bainatna is dated 19.04.19(r l.

Hc has sutrrrtittecl reprcselllittioll orrly on I 1.08.2025. Thcre is rro cxplanatic)n lbr thc said abnormal dclay. Tltcrclorc, pctitioncr call't submit the afbresaid reltresetrtation to resptltrclent No.2 l'vith a reques;t to take action against l'cs;'rondcltt No.(r ancl ljlc the prcsetrt writ petition alleging nolt-coltsidcration ol' thc silllle. Petitioner has to crystallizc ovcr his right atrtl apprtlaclt this Court. Therefore, pctitioncr is rtttt cntitlccl lbr iiiiy rclief' ttruch less the relief sought in thc prcscttt r,r,rit llctitiott attcl the same is liable to be disnrissed.

4.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disrnissed.

Miscellaneous applic'ations penditrg, i1' any, sltall stand closed. Thcre shall lre nt'r order as to costs.

SD/.M.JAWAHAR REDDY

REGIS

//TRUE COPYII

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. One CC to SRt KALVALA SANJEEV, Advocate [O

2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for'ttr lourl

3. Two CD Copies

e

of Telangana

BN

PMK

?*

HIGH COURT

DATED i2310912025