Telangana High Court
WP/28813/2025 of Chinthala Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2025
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 288'13 OF 202s Between: Chinthala Srinivas, S/o.Madunaiah, Aged about 40
[ 31681
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 288'13 OF 202s
Between:
Chinthala Srinivas, S/o.Madunaiah, Aged about 40 years' Occ: Private Service, No 22-7-17 1, Ramagundam, Peddapalli District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Tahsildar, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition uMer Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be s . i.4+-"ni'."?n:
' I r.--'.,--
ssue a writ, order or direction more Particularly one in t ena ure o '*writ.of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondent No.2 in considering the online mutation application of the petitioner for incorporating his name in the Revenue Record in respect of the land in Sy-No.286 to an extent ofAc.1{O Gts situated at Medipelli village, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to rncorporate the petitioneCs name in the revenue records including in the online duly issuing pattadar pass book and title deed- Counsel for the Petitioner: SR! THADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE
The iourt made the following: ORDER
'1a-r-I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHM,.N
WRIT PETITION No.28813 OF 202:i
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard Sri Thadikonda Koteshwara prasad, learn:d counsel lor the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Asst.Gtzt.pleader flor Revenue.
2. According to the petitioner, his grandf'at, rer Chinthala Bondaiah was Tenancy Certificate Holder in respe: ol the land admeasuring Ac.l.00 guntas in Sy.No.2g6 siruarec at Medipelli Village, Ramagudam Mandal, peddapalli District (i r short, ,the subject property'). The said Chinthala Bondaiah died ,r r 04.03.19g5. The petitioner's father died on 16.07.201g. Thereafter he periti.ner has succeeded to thc subject property. He has sut,r ritted onrine application vlde Challan No.PMM2500018829 dated L,. )7.2025 rvith 2"d respondent with a request to issue mutation proceerl ngs and also e-pattadar passbook in respect of the subject prol( rty. Despite receiving and acknowledging the same, 2nd respondenr did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of2nd rrscondent. the petitioner tlled the present writ petition.
2
3. As discussed supra, though the petitioner's grandfather died in the year 1990 and his father died in the year 20 t 8, he has submitted online application only on 17.07.2025. There is abnormal delay' There is no explanation, much less plausible explanation from the petitioner with regard to the said abnormal delay. He has not even fumished details of legal heirs of his grandfather' However, it is for the 2nd respondent to consider the said aspects and dispose of the application vide Challan No.PMM2500018829 dated l7'07'2025 submitted by the petitioner.
4. In the light of the above discussion, this writ petition is disposed ofdirecting the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose ofthe ontine application dated 17-07.2025 vidc Challan No'PMM25000 lgg29 submitted by the petitioner with a request to issue mutation proceedings and pass e-pattadar passbook in respect of the subject property by putting the petitioner on notice and at-lording him an opportunity. If 2nd respondent is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall pass a reasoned order and communicate copy of the said order to the petitioner' He sha[[
J complete the said exercise within 60 days from the dat r of receipt of a copy ofthis order. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, i'rny pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. SD/-I SRINIVASA REDDY ASS ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// F"" N OFFICER To, TJ BS
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue;Department Secreta'i rt, The State of Telangana, Hyderabad.
2. The Tahsildar, RamaErndam Mandal, Peddapalti Distri:
3. One CC to Sri Thadikonda Koteshwara Prasad, Advor;i te [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State I Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
5. Two CD Copies w a:; r .-
HIGH COURT DATED:2310912025
ORDER
WP.No.28813 of 2025 to I lHE 5 '1 1q 2026 ,J z i * I'EqrC DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I .oCA f'a-