WP/28880/2025 of Smt. G. Prasanna alias Swapna Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(SPecial Origina! Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER

rWO THOUSNND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

[ 31681

...PETITIONER

WRIT PETITION NO:28880 oF 2025

Between:

AND

Smt. G. Prasanna @ SwaP

Wife, FUo. Faroocinagar

Telangana State.

na. W/o. Shiva Shanker, Age 30 years, Occ House "Viriis;; ano -ruinJat, Ranga- Reddv District, The State of Telangana, Rep' . by its Principal Secretary' Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad'

2. The District Collector, Vikarabad District'

3.TheRevenueDivisionalofficer,PargiRevenueDivision'VikarabadDistrict.

4. The Tahsildar, Pargi Mandal, Vikarabad District'

5. Gandla Amarender @ Amar, S/o' Chennaial''-+9q 96 yrs' Occ Agriculture'

" Hlt.xlroiipiri Viitage'-parsi tviandal, Vikarabad District'

6. Smt. Gandla Jangamma' W/o' Che-nnaiah.Age q4 YE.999 Agriculture' FUo'

" F.i6.Zit, ia"iripiri Viitige, Pargi Mandal' Vikarabad District'

T.BillapatiMalkaiah,s/o,B.Mallaiah,Age4gYp.OccAgriculture'Rio'H'No'1- ' Tdii:M;i;ivittage' iarsi Mandal, Vikarabad District'

...RESPONDENTS

PetitionunderArticle226ottheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybe pleasedtolssueaWritofMandamusdeclaringtheactionofRespondentNo.4

(Tahsildar, Pargi) in mutating the name of Respondent No'S vide Succession TransactionNo,2400Tgl53Tandissuanceofpassbookandtitledeedinrespect of the Schedule Property as illegal, arbitrary' null and void' Set aside the said successionproceedingsandconsequentialPattadarPassbookandTitleDeed issuedinthenameofRespondentNo.SDirecttheofficialRespondentsNo.lto4

to restore the name of Late. B. Nagaiah alias Nagappa in revenue records until lawful succe:;sion is determined.

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Siuspend the operation of Succession Transaction No, 2400791537

and conseqr.rential Pattadar Passbook and Title Deed issued in favor of Respondent l\o.5 for schedule property.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KULDEEP JADHAV

Gounsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR

REVENUE

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7: -- The Gourt made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE IL LAKSHMAN

IIId

Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

2.

According to the petitioner, her father i.e., G. Chennaiah was the absolute owner and possessor ofland admeasuring Ac.5-19 gts in Sy.No.l77lA, situated at Naskal Village, pargi Mandal, Rangareddy District. After his death, respondent No.5 obtained succession and mutation proceedings in respect ofsubject property contending that he is adoptive son which is factually incorrect.

Respondent No.6 is the mother of petitioner. Sri Billapati Narsimulu and two others have filed a suit vde O.S.No.l57 of 2024 against petitioner and others seeking partition and separate possession ofthe suit schedule property. The said suit is pending and there are no interim orders. According to the petitioner, respondent No.5 has obtained succession and mutation proceedings dated 10.12.2024 in respect of subject property without putting the petitioner on notice and without affording her an opportunity.

ORAL

Challerging the said proceedings, petitioner filed the present writ petition

3.

Ctn the request made by respondent No.3, respondent No.4

has submitted a report dated 21.05.2025 to the respondent No.3

stating that petitioner never made an application before Registration. Therefore, she has to approach Civil Court for claiminli her right.

4.

As discussed supra, petitioner is claiming right over the subject property. According to her, respondent No.5 is not adoptive son of her father i.e., late G. Chennaiah. He has obtained the said r;uccession and mutation proceedings by misrepresentation.

Petitioner has share over the subject property and it is rightly observed by respondent No.4 vide proceedings dated 21.05.2025, if, the petitioner has share over the subject property, she has to approach Civil Court. On obtaining order from the Civil Court, she has to arproach revenue authorities for implementation of the same.

5. In rhe light of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach Civil Court for settlement of her claim/share, on obtaining orders, approach

To,

BS

ev

revenue authorities for implementation of the same. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/.A. SRINIVASA

ASSISTANT

,/TRUE COPY/

SECTION OFFICER

l.ThePrincipalsecretary,RevenueDepartment,secretariat,TheStateof tetangand, HYderabad'

2. The District Collector, Vikarabad District'

3. The Revenue Divisional officer, Pargi Revenue Division' Vikarabad District'

4. The Tahsildar, Pargi Mandal' Vikarabad District'

5. One CC to SRl. KULDiEP JADHAV Advocate [OPUC]

6. Two ccs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High court for the state of Telangana'

louTl

7. Two CD CoPies

PVL

a

a

HIGH COURT

DATED:2310912025

SIA

2 I JAt{ 2,026 +'

a

a

*