Telangana High Court
WP/27201/2025 of Chintalapally Bhasker Rao Vs The State of Telangana, on 22 September 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) AT HYDERABAD IVIONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO:27201 OF 2025 Between: 1. Chintalapally Bhasker Rao, S/o Narayana Rao, Aged 70
"[31681
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
AT HYDERABAD
IVIONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO:27201 OF 2025
Between:
1. Chintalapally Bhasker Rao, S/o Narayana Rao, Aged 70 years, Occ. Retd Govt employe, RVO. 17-29, Nirmaladevi colony, Nallavelli raod, Nagarkarnool-
509209.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad, T.S.
2. The Collector, Ranga Reddy District
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandakur Division, Ranga Reddy District
4. The Tahsildar, Maheshwaram [Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction. more particularly, in the nature of a Writ of [/andamus// A. Declaring the action of Respondents more specifically 2nd to 4th Respondent in trying to encroach onto land in Sy No. 65lEE2l1 (as per revenue records Sy No.65/EE2l1) admeasuring Ac 3.25 gts and land admeasuring Ac 1.15 gts in Sy No.66/E/AA (Sy.No.66/E/AA as per revenue records) totalling to Ac 5.00 gts at Mankhal villdge Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District belonging to the Petitioner' herein as being bad, illegal and arbitrary, and in violation of Article 19 and 21 and 3O0A of the Constitution of lndia and pass such other order/s as this Honourable Court deems fit and proper \
in the facts and circumstances of the case. B. Consequently, direct the Respondents. more specifically the 2nd to 4th Respondents to not to interfere with the possession of the Petitioner over land in Sy No. 65/EE2l1 (Sy No.65 EE2
1 as per revonue records), admeasuring Ac 3.25 gts and land admeasuring Ac 1.15 gts in S'y No.66/E/AA (Sy. No.66/E/AA as per revenue records) totalling to Ac 5.00 gts at Mankhal village, Maheshwaram Mandal. Ranga Reddy District. C.
Any other order/s, this Honourable Court may deem fit and necessary.
lA NO: 1 OF 2tO25
Petitiorr underSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents more specifically Znd to 4th Respondent to not to interfere with the posrsession of the Petitioner over land in Sy No. 65lEE2ll (Sy No.65/EE2l1 as per revenue records) admeasuring Ac 3.25 gts and land admeasuring Ac 1.15 gts in Sy No.66/E/AA (Sy. No.66/E/AA as per revenue records) totall ng to Ac 5.00 gts at fMankhal village, [/aheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the above-captioned WP.
Counsel for tlte Petitioner: SRI PRAMOD MALIGI
Counsel for tlre Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
THB HON'BLB SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No. 27201 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L. Ravinder, learned assistant Governnrent Pleader for revenue
2. Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.3-25 gts in Sy.No.65 lEE2ll and Ac. I - I 5 gts in Sy.No .66lF,lAA, total land admeasuring Ac.5-00 gts, situated at Mankhal Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangareddy District. In proof of the same, he has filed copy of latest pattadar passbook and title deed. He is in possession of the subject property. Even then, respondent No.4 is interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property without following due procedure taid down under law. Challenging the said inaction of respondent No.4, petitioner herein filed the present writ petition.
3. Petitioner has filed photographs. Perusal of the same would reveal that he has constructed compound wall encircling
KL, J W.P.No.27201 of 2025 the r;ubject property without obtaining prior permission. Therefore, this Court directed the petitioner to file photographs after removal of compound wall constmcted by the petitioner. In co;npliance with the said order, petitioner filed photographs vide rnemo USR No. 101987 of 2025 dated 17 .09.2025
4. Sri Pramod Maligi, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions would submit that petitioner wilI obtain permission for construction of compound wall from the autho.:ities concerned and thereafter, he proceeded with the construction of compound wall.
5. [n the light of the said submissions, this writ petition is dispos;ed of, directing respondent No.4 not to interfere with the possu;sion of the petitioner over the subject property. If, there is any violation on the part of the petitioner, respondent No.4 shall take steps against the petitioner by tbllowing due procerlure laid down under law. Liberty is granted to petitioner to obtain permission from the competent'authority for construction of compound wall and thereafter, proceed with the construction of compound wall strictly in accordance with tlre said permit. There shall be no order as to costs
KL, J W.P.No.272Ol of 2025 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed I SD/. A.SREENIVASA ASSISTANT REG ,/e REDDY ISTRAR To //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER I fl,g Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, The State of Telangana, Hyderabad, T.S.
2. The Collector,, RaRga Reddy District
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandakur Division, Ranga Reddy District
4. The Tahsildar,, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
5. One CC to SRl. PRATUOD tvlAltct Advocate tOpUCI
6. Two ccs to GP FoR REVENUE ,High court for the state of relangana. touTl
7. Two CD Copies . PVL TKS
\ HIGH COURT DATED 112210912025
ORDER
STAIE o L) $ $ ttB zrt[ e it ,, " {.. -l ., ; 't' WP.No.27201 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION uryttt 6ttr e-ogT5 \ o .(