Telangana High Court
WP/28550/2025 of Mucherla Manohar Rao Vs State of Telangana, on 22 September 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND OAV OT SEPTEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITI oN NO: 28550 OF 2025 Between: r/r,,.harr2 l\,,lanohar Rao. S/o Late
I sl6E I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
IVONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND OAV OT SEPTEIUBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITI oN NO: 28550 OF 2025
Between:
r/r,,.harr2 l\,,lanohar Rao. S/o Late Anantharama Rao, aged about 72 years' Fl/o il'irir."Al7 S5/4. ptot No 24, Shirdi Sai Nagar Colony, Road No. 4, Hasthinapur icentrat), Vanasthalipuram, R.R. district'
.....PETITIONER
AND
tstateofTelangana,Rep.byitsPrincipalsecretary,RevenueDepartment'
Secretariat, HYderabad.
2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongara Kalan'
3. The Additional Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongara Kalan'
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, lbrahimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy District.
5. The Tahsildar, Madgula Mandal, Ranga Reddy District'
., ...RESPONDENTS
petition Under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent no.2, i.e. the District collector, R.R. District, in not initiating any proceedings on my online applrcation No'
25OOO25g2o, daled 26-04-202 5 without assigning any reasons as illegal and also direct the District collector, R.R. District, i.e. the respondent No.2 to incorporate thenameofthepetitionerinrespectofthelandbearingSy-No.2,12i6'
admeasuring Ac. 0-13 gts, situated at Brahmanapatly village, Ivladgula mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the revenue records.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2025
PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatintheC-(]i]mstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou i may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2, to incorporate the'name o{ I le petitioner in the revenue records tn respect of Sy No. 21216, admeasuring '\( 0-13 gts situated at Brahmanapally village, lVladgula mandal, Ranga Re(1'- y District' pending disposal of the present writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G.RAMA CHANDER RAO
Counsel for the Respondents : SRI L'RAVINDER, AGP FOll I?EVENUE
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.28550 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue.
2. Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.0.l3 guntas in Sy.No.21216, situated at Brahmanpally Village, Madgula Mandal, Rangareddy District. He is also the owner of land in other survey numbers of the very same village. In proof of the same, he has filed copies of the old and new pattadar passbooks. In the latest pattadar passbook, the aforesaid land is missing. Therefore, he has submitted online application bearing No.2500025920, dated 26.04.2025 with a request to correct the said wrong entry, including the subject land in Dharani Portal and issue latest pattadar passbook. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said online application, respondent No.2 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the !-\ .-'"'1
said inaction of respondent No.2, petitioner filcrl the present wnt petltlon
3. Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Goverrrrrent Pleader for Revenuc has produced the written ir s:ructions of respondent No.5, wherein it is stated as follows: "2. .. ..on verification of available 1r; ranies of Madgul village, the Sy.No.2l2 to x.r ext. Ac. l2..20gts classified as Patta land and sla'rds on the name of Sri. Laxman Rao, Subsequenr y, the said land was succeeded in favour ol Sri. Mucharla Ranga Rao (Ac.6_lOgts) and .t. Sri. Mucharla Ananthararna Rao (Ac.rl l0gts). Furthor, it is submitted that after some oi' .h,: LRs of Sri. Mucharla Anantha Ramarao was :,old out to an ext. Ac.4. l5gts to others through rt:gister sale deeds and left over extent Ac. 1.:i-(:.1ts in Sy.No.2l2 was distributed among t:rc Sri. Muchirrla Sudhakar Rao Sio late ,rrrLantha Ramarao & (05) others. F-urther, as seen llurn the pahani for the year ol 2009-10 & 201,f..5 of Bramhanapalle village, the applicant nar.rc was recorded to an ext. Ac.0.t3gts in Sy.No ,t-12 of Bramhanapalle village, Madgul Mandal bLrt in the Bhu Bharati portal, thc applicant's namc lj not reflecting against the Sy.No.2l,l of Bramhanapal Ic vi llage.
3. Further, it is submitted that the a1:plicant applied through Bhu Bharati portal for errcr his name in Missing Sy. Nos module for irr ext. Ac.0. l5gts in Sy.No.212 of Bramhalpalle village, vide application No. 2500(l?,;920, Dt.26.04.2025, the same was rejected l-,., this office authority due to applied lor an a,Ilition extent in which he entitled to only to an ext' Ac.0.l3 gts in Sy.No.2l2 of Bramhanapalle village." Therefore, petitioner has to submit fresh online application in terms of Rule 4 of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Rules, 2025 (for short, 'the Rules, 2025') with Competent Authority as per Schedule A of the Rules, 2025 basing on the market value as mentioned in Schedule B of the Rules, 2025 and the Competent Authority will consider and dispose of the same, in accordance with law. The said written instructions are placed on record.
4. In the light of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to submit fresh online application, along with alt the relevant documents, to the Competent Authority within one (l) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said online application, Competent Authority shall consider and dispose of the same, strictly in accordance with law, by putting the petitioner and all interested parties on notice and affording them an opportunity. He shatl complete the entire exercise
---,1 within sixty (60) days from the date of rece;pr o1' the said online application Miscellaneous applications, if any pendinl:, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ,TRUE COPY// st)/.P. P AS9S\A s ONNA KRISHNA NT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER To SA GJP
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secrel ;r at. State of Telangana at Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongarrr .(alan.
3. The Additional (lollector, Ranga Reddy District at K-on:1a-a Kalan.
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, lbrahimpatnam Divisrr:rr Ranga Reddy District.
5. The T_ahsildar, Madgula lvlandat, Ranga Reddy Distrrc
6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court fbr the S:arr: of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
7. One CC to SRt G.RANIA CHANDER RAO, Advocate [:)t]UCl
8. Two CD Copies a-
HIGH COURT DATED.2210912025
ORDER
WP.No.28550 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. "a / i- 1 :i 0[T zpt .\:. \) \b \b ' i ' :, i,: ".:{ I I I I I i !-,.',