Telangana High Court
WP/28350/2025 of Neetur Ramulu Vs The State of Telangana on 18 September 2025
Between: 1. Neetur Ramulu, S/o: Neetur ghinna Qalqppa, Aged about 4l years, 9.", . Agriculture, .Vo- !.no.1;_5f, Laxmipally, KoOingal Mandal, Angadi Rachiur, Mahabub Nagar Dist , Telanagana 2. Naskampalli Pedda Pakirappa, s/o: Naskampalli Narsappa, Aged about 57 fea[s., Ogg..Agriculture, Rl/o
/,
/.'
[ 3{68 l
Between:
1. Neetur Ramulu, S/o: Neetur ghinna Qalqppa, Aged about 4l years,
9.", . Agriculture, .Vo- !.no.1;_5f, Laxmipally, KoOingal Mandal, Angadi Rachiur, Mahabub Nagar Dist , Telanagana
2. Naskampalli Pedda Pakirappa, s/o: Naskampalli Narsappa, Aged about 57
fea[s., Ogg..Agriculture, Rl/o -_1-32, Laxmipally, Kodangial Mandal, Angadi Rachiur, Mahabub Nagar Dist, Telanagana
3. (yrr.Ma.llappa, S/o: K Bqsappa, Aged about 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o - H.No.7_0-. 2 Laxmipally, i(bdang-al Mandal, Anladi iRachiur, llahabud Nagar Dist , Telanagana
4. Kurva Narsamma,. W/-o'.Mallappa, Aged about 48 years, occ. Agriculture, Rlo - 7-2 Laxmipally, Kodangal Manda-[, Angadi Rachiur, Mahabub Nigar Disi , Telanagana
5. Kurva Kistaopa, p/q; Rqlna.ppa, lggd qbgu! T7 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o _
H. No. 2-30 Lixm r pa riv,' K;;;;'ri'tffi ;;r, Ang#' Ri.ni ri,' rr,r%riJo, b rurg*
Dist, Telanagana
6[:Y,?,n'jlfi
3fl fu i'i;5$?[Tt[?,lf e,?l:ffi $-%#?li;,yr";1,;?],?,,pa,y,
7. Neeturu Kistappa, S/o: Neett
ff :*#g1$:uliJi"ff *tsf#,il"r'nft 33:?lJ'?',,4%?1,1ilI.,o'*J,8fi ,1?;
8. Neetur Venkatappa, S/o: N
"g:f;
,n'Jfi jt,i',iffi ,f ,:,r"L,[?fi,tP:lHr:,ilffi 1,,"X?[I,.?%J,if, ,l?;
9. Neetur Bheemappa, S/o: N. Chinna Flata^^^
ff ii;fl,J,i,ggi,H[;j_'6r*r,,?i,U,?,Rl5j,i,ii,fiffi t"f i?U;.?d,;fi ,:", "ffi:l"i:s?fi f,il,f, ^rJ["?e5|Re,,tgik335lfl:,tffi i:,,oa,,,?of t,,i,:,[T; IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
...PETtTtoNER(S)
AND
' 33:,.:,5lBi[ls5:ffitlt5,?H3l1s principar secretary Revenue Department
2. The collector, vikarabad District Vikarabad, Terangana.
3. The Tahsildar, Kodangal Mandal, Vikarabad, Telangana.
4ffi
ff{til,"ftrffi ii?*,i]5i,'f,ii433R3ffi :1?:Hl"o,o/fnffi ,Raichur, Mahabub Nagar, Telanagaria rvevr I rr
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High'CJurt may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in thJ nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in withholding the payment of Rythu Bandhu amount to the account of the petitioners in respect of the agriculture land i.e. Petitioner No. 1 Neetur Ramulu Sy no ZS11A2 Ex. 2.12 Ac, Petitioner No. 2 Naskampally pedda pakirappa Sy no 2s2tA2 Ex. 3.0g Ac, Petitioner No. 3 Kurva Mallappa sy no 24TlA3 Ex 1.12 Ac, sy No 24ilEE Ex. 0.10
Ac. Petitioner No. 4 Kurva Narsamma Sy no 2471A1 Ex. 1.1i Ac, petitioner No. 5
I{r.g Kistappa sy no 24TlAB Ex. 1.12 Ac, petitioner No.6 Kurva sayappa Sy no 2471E Ex. 5.00 Ac, Petitioner No. 7 Kistsappa Neetur Sy no 2s1lA3'fi.'r.00 Ac, Petitioner No. 8 Neetur Venkatapa Sy no 252tA3 Ex. 1.10 Ac, Petitioner No. 9
Neetur Bheemappa Sy no 252 Al Ex.2.07 Ac, Petitioner No. 10 Kurva Pakeerappa no 247lAA2Ex. 1.130 Ac , collectively in Sy Nos 24711,2511A admeasuring and Sy No 25211total admeasuring Ac 20.16 guntas situated at Angadi Raichur village as illegal, Non-est and against the Principle of natural justice and further direct respondents 1 to 3 to release the pending Rythu Bandhu to the account of the Petitioner and continue to deposit Rythu Bandhu with respect of the Petitioners by disposing the representation dt.41712025 and 71712025'
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed inlupport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents 1 to 3 to ielease the pending Rythu Bandhu to the account for the present year 2025 and continue to depo"sit Rythu Bandhu with respect of the F.lition.it pending disposal of the Writ Petition'
Counsetfor the Petitioners: SRI YOGESH KUMAR HEROOR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos'l to 3: SRI L' RAVINDER'
AGP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No'4:---
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
PETTTTO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned counsel tbr the petitioners and Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue.
2. Petitioners herein are l0 in number. They are claiming right over the land admeasuring Ac.20.16 guntas in Sy.Nos.25llA2, 2521A2, 247IA3, 247lF.E, 247IAl, 247IA8, 247lE, 251IA3, 2521A3, 252lAl and 247/A2 situated at Laxmipally, Angadi Raichur Kondangal Mandal, Mahabubnagar. The details of the same are specifically mentioned in a tabular form in paragraph No.4 of the writ affidavit.
3. Respondenr No.4 has fired a suir in o.S.No.l5g of 2022 (otd o'S'No'9 of 2022) against the petitioners seeking declaration of title and it is pending on the fire of rearned Senior civil Judge, vikarabad. Learned triar court granted injunction directing the petitioners not to alienate and encumber the said propefty. Under the guise of the said order' respondent No.2 is not paying the Ryhu Bandhu benefit to the petitioners he1:in. They have submitted representation datect F j I
i) 07.01.2025 to respondent No.2 with a request to pay Rythu Bandhu benefit to the petitioners herein. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representation, respondent No.2 did ntlt act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondcnt No.2. petitioners filed the present writ petition.
4. Whereas, learned Government Pleader ftlr Revenue, on instructions, would submit that petitioners have to make the Mandal Agricultural officer concented as party to the presetrt writ petition' since he has to subrnit report with regard to standing crop etc' on consideration ot- the said repotl, respondeut No'2 will pay Rythu Bandhu benefit to the petitioners herein subject to result of the aforesaid suit. Inthelightofthesaiddiscussion,thisWritl)etitionisdisposed of directing respondent No.2 to seek for rePott ftom the Mandal Agriculturaloff,rcerwithregardtotlresubjectproperlyandpayRythu Bandhubenefittothepetitionershereinconsideringtherepresentation datedoT,oT.2oz5witlrinaperiodoftwo(2)rnonthstiornthedateof receiptofacopyofthisorder.However,thesaidclirectionissubject
*
J ro the result of O.S.No.158 of 2022 pending on the learned Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. To,
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. TJ BS Sd/-P.PONNA KRISHNA ASS ISTANT REGISTRAR /ffRUE COPY// SECTION OFFTCER The Principal Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat Hyderabad, The State of Telangana, Telangana. The Collector, Vikarabad District Vikarabad, Telangana' The Tahsildar, Kodangal Mandal, Vikarabad, Telangana' One CC to Sri Yogesh Kumar Heroor, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT DATED:1 810912025
ORDER
WP.No.28350 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WTHOUT COSTS t l.l ST4 [ 5 i]r[ 20u5 C\ ''--:t r'".,. - ) * *