WP/25970/2025 of Y. Laxshmamma Vs The State of Telangana on 18 September 2025

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECETUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONbURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN l.A.No.4 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO 25970 0F 2025 Between: JaveedHussainKhan,s/oLateAmjedHussainKhan'Agedabout36years,occ Ar.in".., Fyo 18- 2- 614, Jangamet, Falaknuma, Hyderabad' ...REV|EW PETITIONERURESPONDENT No'9 AND '1 . Y. Laxshmamma, W/o Late Y Venkataiah, Aged about 59 years' Occ House wife, R/o H. No. 1- 107, Pendyal Village, tt'4aheshwaram Mandal' Kanga Reddy District.

2. YJanqaiah,S/oLateYVenkataiah,Agedaboul4gyearl,OccAgricull!.reR/o

- i. fiij]I- rOZ, FenOVat Vilage, Ivlahes-hwaram [v1andal, Ranga Reddy District.

3. Y Balraj, S/o Late Y Venkatalah, Aged about 48 years, occ Agriculture Fl/o H. " N".: -1b7, F""Jvrr Viilage, Mahesiwaram ['4andal, Ranga Reddy District'

4. J Ravalila, W/o J Swamy. D/o Late Y Venkataiah, Ag.ed about 13 y"q'."' 999 HousewifeR/oH.No.1-g9,ElemeneduVillage'lbrahimpatnamManoal' Ranga ReddY District. 5, B Jvothi' W/o Yadaiah, D/o Late Y Venkataiah Aged about 43 yea.rs. occ " il"i,'."'*iiJ'R/; H.-Ni". ias, ntanpetrv Village,- Maheshwaram Mandal RangareddY District.

6. G Sumalatha, W/o Raju, D/o Late Y Venkataiah-Aged about 42 years' Occ

- norr" wife R/o H.' i'l; z1s' aegumpet Village' Kandukur Mandal' Rangareddy District. ... RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

7. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its- Principal Secretary' Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad- 500022'

8. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District'

9. The Joint Collector, O/o District Collector, Ranga Reddy District'

10. The Revenue Divisional officer, Kandukur Division, Ranga Reddy District. 1 1 . The Tahsildar, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District'

12. Laiq Hussain Khan, Sio Late Jaffar Hussain Khan' Ag: i about,70 years, Occ Business, R/o H. No. 19- 3- 1089/A Jahanuma, Falaknr na, Hyderabad'

13. Mohd. Hafeez. S/o Late Khadar Hussain Khan, Age: about 47 years, Occ Business, R/o H. No. 17-7- 114, Yakutpura, Hyderaba:

14. Anees Banu, Wio t\,4ohd. Aqueel Hussain, Aged ibout 48 years, Occ Housewife, R/o H. No. 17- 1- 182, Saidabad, Hyderabrt' . 'l 5, Salma Begum, W/o Late Amjed Hussain Khan. Age: about 50 years, Occ House wife, R/o 18- 2- 614, Jangamet, Falaknuma, Hy: :rabad.

16. Nazia Begum. W/o Anwar Bin Sayeed, Aged about 5 y:ars' Occ House wife' R/o 18- 2- 614. Jangamet, Falaknuma, Hyderabad.

17. Nasreen Banu, W/o lt4ohammed Ghouse Khan, Age: aboul 27 years, Occ House wife, R/o 1B- 2- 614, Jangamet, Falaknuma, Hy: :rabad. ...RESPOND E \TS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Order 47 Rule '1 R/w.1 14 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the I :tition, the High Court may be pleased to review the order passed in Writ Petil r n No 25970 of 2025 dated 18-9-2025 and pass such other order or order. This petitron coming on for hearing, upon perusing {ir petition and affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of )T.J.VIJAYALAKSHMI, appearing on behalf of Review Petitioner, SRI B.VlDl-l" \ SAGAR, rep, SRI ROHIT POGULA appearing for the Respondents No.1 to il rsst. GP for Revenue appearing of the Respondents No 7 to 11, SRI ASHOK IEDDY KANATHALA appeanng for the Respondent No.12, Ms.KEERTI KAB: A appearing for the Respondent No.'1 3, the Court made the following. ORDER

HON' t}I-F], SRI .IUSl'ICE K. LAKSHMAN I.A.No.4 OI. 2025 ln Writ I'etition No.25970 OF 2025 oRD[,]{ lleard Dr. J.Vijayalakshrri. lcarncd counsel lbr the review petitioncr and Sri B.Vidhya Szrgar. lealrred counscl leprcsenting Sri Rohit Pogula. lealnccl counscl lirr rcspondcnt Nos.l kr 6 herein / writ petitioners, lear-ncd Asst. (lor t.l)leaclcr lirr l{cvcuue, Sri Ashok Reddy Kanathala, learned counsel fbr l2'r' r'espondent and Ms. Keerti Kabra, learned Counsel appearinu lirl l3'r' rcs;rondcnt.

2. 'the petitiorler rcspon(lcnt No.9 in the atbresaid writ petition, filed thc prest:nt levit--rv pttition [(] rc\ iew the order dated 18 09.2025 in W P.\o.15970 ol'201i

3. \\/rit petiLioncrs lllcd thc slid ri'ril. pctiLion challenging the order dated I 1.07.202-5 passed br, .1'l' resporrdent allowing the applications filed by the rcsporrdent Nos.6 to l2 therein / respondent Nos. l2 to l7 hercin tluough Bhu Bharathi l)oftal in'lM-24 Module lor PPB- Courl Cases to incorporate their names in the revenue records and issuing thc pattadar passbooks fbr the land admeasuring Ac.3.22 gLrntas III Sy.No. 169/,4A o1- Pcndval Villlr Maheshu,araur I I Mandal. R.anga Rcclcll, Drstrict recc'ipt ola ct'rpr of'tlte said oldcr 4 Vidc orclcr clatetl I 8.09.1015. this ('ourt clr .r oscii ol'thc sritl u'rit petitior-r dirccting 3''l rcsponderrt thcrcin to tli..1 r sc ol thc uppcal (il reccircd) lilcd b1 thc rvrit pctitioners Lrndcr !,itiorr l5 ol'thc Telangana Biru Iliralati (ltccord ol' Rights rn Ir rd) .,\cL, 2015 challcnging the ordcr dated I 1.07.1015 ol'rcsp()n(i( 1 t lr.o.J. str-rctlr Il accordance rr ith lnu'. by putting the pctitioncl's. r'( - | )u(l.nt \os.(r ro la thl-rcirt arrd all iutelcsted parlics ou noticc rrr,l , . irrtlinu tlre nr an oltpottuuitr. u ilhin a pcriod ol- thrcc (3) rnorrtlr. I o111 111.' riutc ol

5. I'hc petitioner herein tllecl thc PreserrL r.cvir'rr Pq1i1j1r11 rcsporldent No.9 hcrein Joint (lollector', l{ange It -' ld1 t)isrrict, on contcnding that thc rvrit petitioners suppressccl the r r real lllcd bctirre- 14.08.2025 r,ide SI{ No.18478 of 102-5 plior to rhe tLLr: o1'llline olthc prese nt *'rit petition i.e. 29.08.2025 I)ivisron }le nclr . 'this ('orrrt vicle order dated 16.07.2024 in W.A.No.759 ol 2024 grirrLr :d libcrry ro rhc petitioners to approach civil Courf tbr redressal of'tlt( i - gricvar-rce. The Division IJench also clarified thai the entrics, il' r r y, rnadc in thc revenue t ecorcls are sub.iect to outcome o1'civil srr t whiclr may bc tiled bl the parlies. Suppressinq the said lact ol'liling appeal belore the 9'r' respondent hcrein, the *,rit pctitionels llled thc present writ pe f ltlon 6- Sri B.Vidh)'a Sagar, learnecl courrsel appearing lor writ [)etitioners rvould fairly submit that thc rvrit pctitioners did not in{brm the said lact to the learned counscl on lecord, due to the said rriscornrrunication, the1, havc not nrL'utioncd about the l'iling ol'said appcal b1,thc writ petitioners bctorc rhc 9'r'rcspondent hcrein

7. ln the light ol the sard subrrissions, this lcvierv application is allowed. The order dated 18.09.101i in W.['].No.]5970 o1'1025 passed b1' this Coun is modilled, grantinlr liberty to the writ pctitioncls, to approach civil Court tbr redlcssrl ol their qricvancc and the entries, il an1,. made in the revcnue reco|cls arc subicct to outcomc ol-civil suit to r1 e b m cd bv thc

8. With the albresaid nrodillcirtion. this rcvicw is disposed of Consequently, misccllancorLs pctitions, il- any, pcrrding in this revicw shall stand closed. 'o''i5$r'Pfi"J'-!'&'f HiH G SECTION OFFICER Secretari0t' Telangana State' //TRUE COPY// The Pfincipal Secretary' Revenue Department' Hyderabad- 500022' The District Collector' Ranga Reddy District'

To,

I

\

3. The Joint Coltector, O/o District Collector, Ranga Red: I District.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, R: tr3a Reddy District

5. The Tahsildar, Maheshwaram [Vandal, Ranga Reddy I strir;t 6 One CC to Dr J V|JAYALAKSHATil, Advocate. [OPUC]

7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the St, te of Telangana Iour]

8. One CC to SRt ROHTT POGULA, Advocate. tOpUCl

9. One CC to SRt ASHOK REDDy KANATHALA, Advrr.:, re. tOpUCl

10. One CC to Ir./s KEERTt KABRA, Advocate. [OpUC] 1 1. Two CD Copies BSK GJP \|

HIGH COURT DATED:0511212025

ORDER

l.A.No.4 OF 2025 IN WP.No.25970 of 2025 n I iiLii ftm ,/ /...r' ,t/ DISPOSING OF THE REVIEW PETITICII WITHOUT COSTS tt ,Af"\ tt- j i I I I I I I I I i I i i .f" < l --' .l i.