Telangana High Court
WP/28256/2025 of Bhukya Shankar Naik Vs State of Telengana on 18 September 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WR]T PETITION NO:28256 OF 2025 Between: AND Phu\yl. Shankar Na!k, Q/o. Seetha Ram, Aged
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WR]T PETITION NO:28256 OF 2025
Between:
AND
Phu\yl. Shankar Na!k, Q/o. Seetha Ram, Aged about 49 years, Rl/o.
HemlaThada Village, GaridepalliMandal, Suryape[ District.
...peffffOXen
1. State of Telengana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Bldgs, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Suryapet District, Suryapet.
3. The Tahsildar, Garidepalli Mandal, Suryapet District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 in taking action on petitioner's recent representations dated 25.08.2025 and also application through Bhu Bharathi for issue of new pass book and date correction with regard to petitione/s land in vide Applhation No. 2500087745 dated: 28.07.2025 retating to lands.in Sy No. 59 in an extent of Ac. 0.26 Guntas, Sy No. 59/3/'l in an extent of Ac. 0.26 Gts and Sy No. 59/3/1 in an extent of Ac. 1.'12 Gts, situated at Kalmala Cheruvu Village, Garidepalli Mandal, Suryapet District is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to issue new pass book by correcting the survey nos. and extents .
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirl umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m€) be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to take action on petitioner's representatio tdated 25.08.2025
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N. SUNDERESHAN
Representing SRI T. JANARDH/ 'N RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAI(SHMAN
WRIT PETITION N0.28256 0F 20.25
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
After arguing for some time, Sri N.Sundereshan, learned counsel representing Sri T.Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition, with a liberry to file fresh writ petition. He has also made endorsement to the said ' effect on tl.e bundle.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty as sought for. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY//
1. OneCCto SRI T.JANARDHANRAO, Ad
2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Co tourl
3. Two CD Copies MMT SD/. S. ALLIKARJUNA TANT RE R ECTION OFFICER vocate I P urt for the of Telangana. 9"
l HIGH COURT DATED:1810912025
ORDER
WP.No.28256 of 20Zs IIF
27. til2m r\'_ Coa , z. h +. ,'',i*:.i... P;SMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WI THDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
c,-1"
!4