Telangana High Court
WP/23139/2025 of Neeli Anjaneyulu Vs The State of Telangana on 18 September 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE X.MXSUUNT.I PETITION NO: 23139 OF 2025 [ 3168 ] ...PETITIONER WRIT Between: Neeli Anjaneyulu, S/o. Neeli
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE X.MXSUUNT.I
PETITION NO: 23139 OF 2025
...PETITIONER
WRIT
Between:
Neeli Anjaneyulu, S/o. Neeli Kistaiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Business, R:/o. Flat-No.'102, Sai Samskruti Towers, Peerzadiguda, tt/edipally, Medchal- Malkajgiri - District.
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad T.S.
2. The District Collector, Vikarabad, District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Vikarabad - Division, Vikarabad, District.
4. The Tashildar, l\4omenpet - IVlandal, Vikarabad - District.
5. The Grampanchyat l\/ekavanampally, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary, Mekavanarhpally Grampanchyat, ltlomenpet, Mandal, Vikarabad District.
6. Neeli Laxmi, W/o Neeli Chandraiah, Aged about 50 years, Occ. House wife, R/o H. No. 5-55/1, Mekavanampally (V), Momenpet (M), Vikarabad' District.
7. Neeli Ravi Kumar, S/o. W/o Neeli Chandraiah, Aged about 50 years, Occ.
Govt Employee, R/o H. No. 5-55/1, Mekavanampally (V), Momenpet (M), Vikarabad, District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declaring the inaction of the respondent no. 2 to 4 not considering the representation dt. 41512025 which was given by the petitioner to delete the names of the respondent no. 6 and 7 from Bhu Bharathi portal as well as from all the revenue records for the land in Sy. No.149/A 111112 to the extent of Ac. 0.02.O0 gts on the name of respondent no. 7 and in Sy. No. 149lAl1l1' to the extent of Ac.
0.04.00 gts argicuture land on the name of respondent no. 6, situated at N/ekavanampally village, Mominpet mandal, Vikarabad District, which is existing houses in the said property since long time and the respondent no.6 and 7
colluded with the revenue officers obtained patta passbooks to the said houses and drawing the raitu bandu amounts and other benefits which is disputed property between the petitioner and the respondent no. 6 and 7 is illegal, arbitrary, violation of principals of naturaljustice lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition underSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to 4 to consider the representation given by the petitioner pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SMT. B KEERTHI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI KATTA PRADEEP REDDY SC FOR
GRAMPANCHAYAT
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7: ----- The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.23139 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Mr.Y.Bala Murali, learned counsel representing Ms.B.Keerthi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. He had made an endorsement to the said effect on the bundle.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Granting liberty as sought for, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. M.JAWAHAR REDDY ASS ANT REG /TRUE COPY/ OFFICER To, , . nr r^r l.oneCCtoSRl.BKEERTHIREDDYAdvocateIoPUC]
2. oneCCToSRIKATTAPRADEEPREDDYSCFoRGRAMPANCHAYAT
3. TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana. lourl
4. Two CD CoPies PVL TKS P^tq I il
/ HIGH COURT DATED:1 8/0912025
ORDER
WP.No.23139 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS or( to\rz\ I I -i(' 0 6 JAN zri? C.t L) * $ irt; .\ n
.k ><