WP/28078/2025 of Donthagani Venkanna Vs The State of Telangana on 17 September 2025

&

*a

a

\t

t 3r6rs I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 28078 OF 2025

Between:

AND

1 Donthagani.Vglkalnq, S/o D.Ramaiah, Aged 50 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o

- lt tlq 4-96/1, Thakkellapahad Vittage, Miry-atguda Mandat, Natgdnda Distiict.

2. Donthagani Ramanamma, Wo Dointhagdni-Venkanna, AgeO"aS years, Occ Agriculture, R/o H.No. 4-96/1, Thakkellapahad Village, Miryalgucia Mandal, Nalgonda District.

...PETITIONERS

t

*

u

*t

a

,lI

c

1. The State of Telangqra, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue _ D.ep{tment, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The D_istrict Collector, Nalgonda Distiict, Nalgonda.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalguda Division, Miryalguda, Nalgonda District

4. The Tahsildar, Miryalguda lvlandal, Nalqonda District.

5 Sub-lnspector of Police, Miryalguda Ruial Police Station, Nalgonda District.

6. thougani Venkanne_, S/o Sriramulu, Aged 40 years, R/o- Thakkellapahad Village, Miryalguda [Vlandal, Natgonda District.

7 C.hougani Ravi, S/o Sriramulu, Aged 37 years, Occ police Constable, R/o Thakkellapahad Village, Miryalguda lvtandai, Nalgonda District

...RESPONDENTS

{

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners' agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 1.04112 in Sy.No. 1Bl1A and Sy.No. '19/A situated at Thakkellapahad Village, Miryalguda Mandal, Nalgonda District by orally directing the Petitioners not to enter land and cultivate the land in collusion respondents 6

and 7 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Article 19, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents not interfere with peaceful possession and f f i enjoyment of Petitioners' agricultural land admeasuring Ac l .o'+1t2 in Sy No'

18/1A and Sy.No '19/A t'it'lt"a at Thakkellapahad Village' MirYalguda Mandal' '

Nalgonda District in anY 'nanner

IA NO:1O

F

Petition under Se':tion 151 CPC praying that in the circu intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition'theHighCourtmi direct the respondents not interfere with peaceful possession a Petitioners' agricultural land admeasuring Ac 1 O4t2 in Sy No l 19/AsituatedatThakkellapahadVillage,MiryalgudaMandal,l.

rstances stated

l,i be Pleased to

n d en joYment of

8/1A and SY No'

lirlgonda District,

)

in any manner

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI' G' SUNDARESAN

Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 1to4: SRI L' RAVINDER' AGI) FOR REVENUE

Counsel for the Respondent No'5: GP FOR HOME

Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 6to7:-

The Court made the following: ORDER

f,

+

I

I

I

I

*

*

*

rI

+

I

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETI'IION No.28078 oI 2025

ORAL OR-DER:

Heard leamed counsel lor the petitioners and Mr.L.Ravinder, leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4.

2.

According to the petitioners, petitioner No. 2 is the absolute owner and possessor of the land measuring Ac. 0-14 guntas in Sy. No. lSle._llz and Ac.0-30% guntas in Sy. No. 19/€9, situated 1n Thakkellapahad Village, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District. In proof of, the same, they have filed copies of the latest passbook and title deeds. Petitioner No.2 has filed a suit in O.S.No.98 of 2017 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda, against Sri Chowgani Venkanna and two others, seeking perpetual injunction. The suit was decreed on 07.11.2017.

She is in possession of the said property. There is a standing crop ofpaddy in the said property. Even then, respondent Nos. 4 and 5

are interfering with the possession of the petitioners at the instance of respondent Nos. 6 and 7, without following the due procedure I

I

.,..

I

laid by law. Challenging the said action of respontl,..rt Nos. 4 and 5, the present writ petition is filed.

3.

A penrsal of the record would reveal that ther: are live FIRs pending against the petitioners in reldtion to tlr(r vt:ry same property. Thr:refore, the Investigating Officer in the:iiid cases must conduct the investigation strictly in accordance ri,iIr lau,, taking into conside.-ation the fact that petitioner No.2 rls the latest passbook and title deed, and that there is a decrec ir. hcr favour in O.S. No. 98 ctf 2017 on the file of the principal Junir,r Civil Judge, Miryalaguda. Respondent Nos.4 and 5 cannot intcr.lere with the possession o1'the petitioners over the subject pr()lcrt). without following the due procedure laid down under lavr,.

4.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pcnding. f any, shall stand closed- a //TRUE COPY//

SO/. A. SRINIVASA REDDY

ASSIStrANT REGISTRAR

TpECTION OFFICER

To,

c

a

+

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, liecretariat Buildings, T.S.,Hyderabad.

2. The District Oollector. Nalgonda District, Nalgonda.

3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalguda Division 'vliryalguda, Nalgonda District 4 The Tahsildar, Miryalguda Mandal, Nalgonda District.

5. Sub-lnspector of ioli6e, Miryalguda Ruial Police Statror Nalgonda District 6 One CC to fjRl G. SUNDARESAN, Advocate IOPUC]

7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE,High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad [(f UT]

B. Trlvo CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the Srate of Telangana, at '

Hyderabad [(]UTl

-

v.9. Two CD CoPies

-..-.i'--

ro

L..^

-

f

t

il

{&

i

HIcH coURT

DATED:1710912025