Telangana High Court
WP/27692/2025 of Jalapelli Laxmaiah Vs The State of Telangana on 15 September 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 27692 OF 2025 Between: 'l . Jalapelli Laxmaiah, S/o.J.Pochaiah Aged about 55 years, Occ .
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 27692 OF 2025
Between:
'l . Jalapelli Laxmaiah, S/o.J.Pochaiah Aged about 55 years, Occ . Cultivation R/o.H.No.2-1511, Bandalingampalli Village Yellareddypet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District.
2. Kodumunja Devaiah, S/o.Rajaiah Aged about 42 years, Occ . Cultivation Rl/o.H.No.'l-31/2, Bandalingampalli Village Yellareddypet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District.
3. Kodumunja Raju, S/o.Rajaiah Aged about 37 years, Occ Cultivation Rr/o.H.No.2-10l3, Bandalingampalli Village Yellareddypet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District.
4. Kothapally Pochamallawa, D/o.Yellaiah W/o.Mallaiah, Aged about 57 years, Occ Cultivation Rl/o.H.No.1-95, Bandalingampalli VillaEe Yellareddypet Mandal, Rajanna Slrcilla District-
5. Kothapally Buchaiah, S/o.Narsaiah Aged about 49 years, Occ. Cultivation R/o.H.No.1-98/1, Bandalingampalli Village Yellareddypet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District.
6. Kunta Naresh, S/o.Late Rajaiah Aged about 27 yea$, Occ . Cultivation - Ri/o.H.No.1-44, Bandalingampalli Village Yellareddypet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District-
AND
1.
2.
3.
4.
...PETITIONERS
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The Chief Commissioner Land Administration, Government of Telangana Nampally, Hyderabad.
The Diskict Collector, Ralanna Sircilla Districl.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sircilla, Yellareddypet Revenue Division Rajanna Sircilla District.
The Tahsidlar, Yellareddypet Mandal Rajanna Sircilla District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia pr lying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the Hil I Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ' Order or Direction' more larticularly one in thenatureofWritofMandamus,declaringtheactionoftheRes)ondentNoS.2to 5 more particularly by the Sth Respondent in threatening ll dispossess by interfering with the cultivation of the petitioners agricultural latrr s to an extent of Ac.1 .39112 gts each total admeasuring Ac 11 38 gts in Sy't'l r.262 situated at Bandalingampalle Village, Yellareddypet Mandal' Rajanna Sirr;i following the due procedure under law while pending co'r petitioners request for grant of individual assignment pattal; names in the Revenue Records pursuant to their Representa i in !-espect of the above said lands as illegal' arbitrary' u I
consequently direct the Respondent Nos 2 to 5 more parti Respondent not to dispossess by interfering with the physlt;i cultivation of the petitioners agricultural lands to an extent of /\
and total admeasuring Ac 11 38 gts in Sy No 262 situated at Village, Yellareddypet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District witl- procedure of law pending consideration of the representatior dt.30.05.2025 for grant of individual assignment pattas by ents the Revenue Records lA NO: 1 OF 2025
-p"tinon
unoer Section 151 CPc praying that in the circ'l the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court t direct the Respondent Nos 3 to 5 more particularly to the Stlr dispossess by interfering with the physical possession anc Petitioners agricultural lands to an extent of Ac 1 391/2 e admeasuring Ac.11 38 gts in Sy No 262 situated at Bandzrl Yellareddypet Mandal, Ra.ianna Sircilla District without followir law pending consideration of the representation of the petit(
for grant o{ individual assignment pattas by entering their nar Records, pending disposal of the above writ petition'
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI C'HARI PREETH
C.r"t"f ior tne Respondents: ASST' GP FOR ASSIGNMENI
itre Court made the'following: ORDER
a District without
;ideration of the
by entering their
,n, Dt.30-05-2025
:onstitutional and
ularly to the 5th
I possession and
;.1.39112 gts each
Bandaling am Palle
rut following due
of the petitioners
ing their names in
nstances stated in
ray be pleased to
lespondent not to
cultivation of the
.s each and total
rgampaile Village'
; due procedure of
lers dt.30.05.2025
es in the Revenue
i
I
I
I
L
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No. 27692 0F 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment.
2. According to the petitioners, the Government has assigned larrd admeasuring Ac. 11-38 guntas in Sy.No.262, situated at Bandalingampalle Village, yellareddypet Ma.dal, Rajan na Sircilla District to their grandfather i.e., Kodumunja Rajaiah. After the death of late Kodumunja Rajaiah, petitioners have succeeded the subject property and they are in the possession of the subject property. They have fited W.P.No.10216 of 2025 to declare the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 5 in failing to consider their representation dated 11.O2.2O25 for grant of pattas in respect of the aforesaid land. The said writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn gran.ting liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedies before the appropriate lorum in accordance with law. This court also observed that petitioners are not permitted to file fresh writ petition on the sarne cause of action. Thereafter, petitioners have submitted representation dated 30.05.2025 to the
3. d respondent '"r,ith a request to include their names in the revenue records and issue e-pattadar passbooks and also permit - \ 5€:-{ \I
them to cultivate the subject lard. Despite acknou''ledging the said representation, the 3rd reslr act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inac 1 respondent, petitioner filed the present writ petitior
3. Whereas, learned Assistant Governmenr. Assignment has produced written instructions c wherein it is stated that as per the revenue recor( Sy.No.262, admeasuring Ac. 11-38 gutnas Bandalingampalle Village, Yellareddypet Mandal, ll District is a Government land (Bancharat). As record s ald village records, the said Governmen t assigned to anyone. Petitioners are trying to oc Government land. They are not in possession propertv. Therefore, the question of respondent-s dispossess the petitioners does not a-rise. The srl are placed on record.
4. As discussed supra, the petitioners W.P.No.10216 of 2025 to declare the action of respc 4 in not considering the representation date submitted by them for grant of pattas and issuan: passbooks. The said u,rit petition was dismisserl -eceiving and ,ndent did not on of the 3'a Pleader for respondents s, the land in situated at rjanna Sircilla per the office land was not :upy the said rf the subject threatening to d instructions herein filed T dent Nos.2 to f lt.o2.2025 r of e-pattadar as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. This Court categorically held that petitioners are not perrnitted to file fresh writ petition for the same cause of action.
5. Petitioners instead of working out appropriate remedies before the appropriate forum, submitted representation dated 30.05.2025 to the 3.d respondent with same request and hled the present writ petition alleging non consideration of lhe said request. The present writ petition IS contrary to the aforesaid order
6. Both the petitioners are claiming that they are the legal heirs of Kodumunja Rajaiah, but they have not furnished the details of legal heirs of the said Rajaiah. They have to crystallize their rights over the subject properfy, thereafter, they have to approach the revenue authorities seeking implementation of the same. Instead of doing so, they have filed aforesaid writ petition which was dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to avail appropriate remedies before the appropriate forum. Instead of availing appropriate remedies before the appropriate forum, they have submitted aforesaid representation dated 30.05.2025 and flled the present writ petition alleging non consideration of the same. ( (
Therefore, the petitioners are not entitled for any r-, iief, much less, the relief sought in the present writ petition. 7 . Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed . However, the petltloners are at liberty to avail alternate rem e lies before the appropriate forum as per the liberty granted by his Court vide order dated 04.O4.52025 in W.P.No.lO2L6 of 2O2i,. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous applications, if aly pendin 1. shall stand closed. Sd/-A,J AQs'r ;TAr-{trREGrST REE RAR To, /TTRUE COPY//
1. The Principal Secretary Revenue Department, State of l Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Chief Commissioner Land Administration, Governnrt Nampally, Hyderabad.
3. The District Collector, Raianna Sircilla District.
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sircilla, Yellareddypet tl Rajanna Sircilla District.
5. The Tahsidlar, Yellareddypet lvlandal Rajanna Sircilla Dit
6. One CC to SRI C.HARI PREETH, Advocate- [OPUC]
7. Two CCs to GP FOR ASSIGNIVIENT, High Court for the tourl
8. Two CD Copies. BSK PMK ([ , SECTION OFFICER elangana, nt of Telangana rvenue Division trict. itate of Telangana
HIGH COURT DATED:1 510912025
ORDER
/' \ .,. l ,i),, 2ltic65 WP.No.27692 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 8A t) )r 11, t I