Telangana High Court
WP/27721/2025 of Chinala Gattaiah Vs The State of Telangana on 15 September 2025
THE I-IiGI{ COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdic(ion) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K,LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO:27721 OF2025 Between: Chinala Gattaiah, S/ o. Rayamallu, aged about 50
"-.'.-'t
[ 31681
IN THE I-IiGI{ COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdic(ion)
MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K,LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO:27721 OF2025
Between:
Chinala Gattaiah, S/ o. Rayamallu, aged about 50 years-Occ. Agr'lculture, R/o.:.H. [rl9
6-12l1 , Brahmanapalle-Reildipalle Viiiage, Veenavanka Mandal, Karimnagar District
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, rep. by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. Th; District Collector, Karimnagar District at Karimnagar
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District
4. The Thesildar, Veenavanka Mandal, Karimnagar District
S. Cninata Rayamallu, S/ o. Mahankali Aged 85 years, Occ.Nil, F/o. H tlq'. Q-:l!'
- grahminapalle-Reddipalle Village, Veenavanka Mandal, Karimnagar-District
O. Cninati Tliirupathi, S/'o. Rayamlltu Aged 45 years, Occ. agriculture, Fl/.o'
- Gollavrada-Brahminapalle-Reddipalle Near Anjaneyaswamy Temple Village, Veenavanka Mandal Karimnagar District
7. The Station House Officer, Ve-enavanka Police Station, Veenavanka Karimnagar District.
..RESPoNDENTS
'
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents particularly 4th Respondent Tahsildar in trying to execute the documents presented by the unofficial respondents no. 5 and 6 at the instigation of respondent no.7 infavour of third parties in connection with the petitioner ancestral property of agricultural lands in sy No. 185/C to an extent of Ac.1.00 gts situated at Brahmanapalle Village of Veenavanka Mandal of Karimnagar .District without considering the representation dated 16.08.2025 of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and against to the principles of natural justice and also opposed to Articles 14, 19,21 and 300-A of constitution of lndia and consequently to direct the 4th respondents not :, l to entertain any document presented by the unofficial respondents as civil suit also pending basing on the representation dated 16.08.2025 of the petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the res;tondents particularly 4th respondent Tahsildar not to entertain any document presented by the unofficial respondents no. 5 and 6 in connection with the petitioner ancestral property of agricultural lands in Sy No. 185/C to an extent of Ac.1.00 gts situated at Brahmanapalle Village of Veenavanka Mandal of Karimnagar [)istrict by considering the representation dated 16.08.2025 of the petitioner, perrding disposal of the above writ petition.
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRl. AJAY KUIVIAR MADISETTY
Counset for the Respondent Nos.l to 4: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S & 6: -
Counsel for l:he Respondent No.7: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No. 2772L OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Mr.M.Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and i!ir.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue
2. Petitiriner herein has filed a suit vide O.S.No.144 of 2O2S against th'--r respondent Nos.S and 6 and 5 others for partition and separate possession of the land admeasuring Ac.O-20 gts 1n Sy.No.I47 lE situated at Kalvala Village, Shankarapatnam Mandal, Karimna-gar District and the land admeasuring Ac.1-00 gts in Sy.No.185/C situated at Brahmanapalle Village, Veenavanka Madal, Karimnagar District and the same is pending on the file of Prirrcipal Junior Civil Judge at Huzurabad. An interlocutory application seeking temporary injunction is also pending. In the meanwhile, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition to declare the action of 4th respondent in trying to execute the documents presented by respondent Nos.S and 6 in respect of the aforesaid property. Therefore, challenging the said action of the 4tr, respondent, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
3. As discussed supra, the aforesaid suit seeking partition and separate possession of the aforesaid subject property is pending
- and the interrocutory apprication fired by him is also pending. During the pendency of the aforesaid suit and apprication, petitioner cannot file the present writ petition seeking a direction to the 4tt' respondent not to entertain the documents submitted by responcient Nos.S and 6 in respect of the aforesaid property. He has to F)ursue the said interrocutory application and o.s.No. r44 of 2025 a,d obtain orders from the 4th respondent. If respondent Nos'5 a.d 6 arienate the aforesaid property to 3.a parties during the pendency of the said suit, the petitioner can contend that the alienation hit by /rs pend.ens under section 52 0f the Transfer of Property Act, 1Bg5 4' In the light of the same, this writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue the said suit and interlocutory apprication and on obtaining orders, he can approach respondent Nos' 2 to 4 with a request to imprement the said order. There shedl be no order as to costs. Misr:ellaneous closed. applications, if any pending, shall stand i/TRUE COPYII -sg:-!q. osMr.N ALr BAIG ASstSrANr nrcrSrCai .' /4\-/ SECTIOI.,I OFFICER To,
1.
2. one CC to SRt. 4jAy_!(r/t\rAR MADtSqTTy Advocate topUCI ff,ir",,. to GP FoR iivEriuE,S:sh c"L;t r;;ii!'sirt" or reransana. IW:fd 3"3:S"R HoME, Hish court ror the state or rerangana. [oUrJ
3.
4. CHR GrP e?
HIGH COI.'RT DATED:1 li/09/2025
ORDER
W.P.No.27721 of 2A25 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUIT COSTS
s * HE S7,-r (J I 0 iri'l 2i}26 q