Telangana High Court
WP/25427/2025 of Sathi Venkata Rama Reddy Vs The State of Telangana on 15 September 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NOi 25427 OF 2025 Between: Sathi Venkata Rama Reddy, S/o Late Rama Krishna
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NOi 25427 OF 2025
Between:
Sathi Venkata Rama Reddy, S/o Late Rama Krishna Reddy, Aged about 64
years, Occ Agriculture, RJo Gandhinagar, Kakinada East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Collector, Medak District, Telangana.
3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy, lriledak District, Telangana.
4. The Station House Officer, Hathnoora Police Station, Hathnoora Road, Medak
5. The Golden Trees Ventures, Flat No. G - 12, Magnus View Apartments, Khanamet' Hyderabad' Telangana
...RES,.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No. 2 in failing to consider and act upon the representation dated 1010412025, as illegal, arbikary, unconstitutional and contrary to the principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the of the respondent No. 2 to refrain the office of the respondent No. 3 herein from interfering in the subject property bearing Sy. No.22912-9, situated at Mangapur Village, Doulthabad Grampanchayat, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy, Medak, Telangana, without following the due process of law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents herein to not cause illegal interference in the enjoyment and the possession of the Subject Property of the petitioner herein bearing Sy. No.
22912-9, situated at Mangapur Village, Doulthabad Grampanchayat, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy, Medak, Telangana, without following the due process of law, pending disposal of the main writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHAMMED ABDUL WAHAB
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'l TO 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.25427 of 2025
Mr. Mohammed Abdul Wahab. learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that Sri Kasini Srikanth, Sri Humanabad Rarnesh, Sri Parbhugari Naga Raju and Sri Mahesh Chandra Tiwari, approached him stating that they are the agreement holders of the subject property i.e., Acs.6.20 guntas in Sy.No.229l2-9, situated at Mangapur Village, Daulatabad Gram Panchayat, flathnoor Mandal, Sanga Reddy, Medak, Telangana, executed by the petitioner on 19. l2.2022.They have requested him to prepare the present writ affidavit. On their instructions, he has prepared the present writ alfidavit. They have taken the vakalath and writ affidavit from him stating that they will get the signatures of the petitioner, as he is resident of Kakinada, East Godavari District. He has believed the words of agreement holders and handed over the writ affidavit and vakalath to them with proper instructions to get signatures of the writ petitioners on the affidavit and vakalath and get the same attested. They have handed over the signed, attested copies of writ affidavit and vakalath to the counsel.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
I I I
r-) Believing their version, leamed counsel has filed the present writ petltlon
2. It is opt to note that Sri Sathi Venkata Rama Reddy - petitioner present physically in Court today and informed that he never entered into any agreement with the said persons in respect of the aforesaid property. However, he is going to take action against Sri Kasini Srikanth and 3 others in accordance with law.
3. ln the light of the said subrnission, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to Mr. Mohammed Abdul Wahab, learned counsel for thc petitioner to take action against the aforesaid agreement holders of petitioner. On instructions, he would submit that he never acted against the interest of the petltloner. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. l-here shall be no order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY// Sd/.B.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Principat Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.
2. The Collector, Medak District. Telanoana " ;ffi|.i:,:1."i1[""J"Tr" officer, Hathn6ori Mandar, Sansareddy, Medak
4. The S_tation H5use Officer, Hathnoora police Station, Hathnoora Road. Medak 5 one cc ro sRr MoHArvMEg3_aqyi vv7i'fid,;ilI)ilC top"ucr . Iy;f"";:" ?j,ff* never.rue-, nrsh'ilrti6,1#ttatebr rerahgana, at
7. Two CD Copies WDL /l^ "PS
HIGH COURT DATED:1 510912025
ORDER
WP.No.25427 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
t tHE SI-A 2 { JAil m2$ O (.) \ tfo)nt -4 *-4(a*