Telangana High Court
CC/938/2025 of Ganta Raju Vs Sri Seetharam on 15 September 2025
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 938 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the
[ 31681
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 938 OF 2025
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein for the wilful violation and deliberate disobedience of the Orders of the High Court dated 2010912024 passed in W.P
No.25889 of 2024.
Between:
Ganta Raju, S/o. Late.G.Somaiah Aged about 48 yrs, Occ R/o.H.No.3-35-43311,Marredpally, [/ahatma Gandhi Nagar,
500026.
Business,
Hyderbad-
...PETITIONER
AND
1. Sri Seetharam, S/o. Not Known to the petitioner The Tahsildar and Joint Sub Registrar, Nared met, Malkajgiri Zone, Medca h l-Malkajg iri District.
2. Sri Parameshwar Reddy, S/o. Not Known to the Petitioner The Revenue lnspector Naredmet, Malkajgiri Zone, Medcahl-Malkajgiri District.
...CONTEMNORS
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 OF CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to securing the attendance of respondents/Contemnors.
Counselfor the Petitioner: VEERA BABU GANDU
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
'tHtr HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE No.938 OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Tris Contempt Case is filed alleging willful and deliberate violatior of an order dated 20.09.2024 in W.P.No.25889 of 2024.
2. Vide the aforesaid order, this Court directed respondent Nos.3 to 5 therein not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property' and this Court also directed the petitioner not to make construction of compound wall without obtaining prior permission of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, failing which, liberty is granted to respondent Nos.3 to 5 to take action against the petitioner.
3. Following the said order, petitioner has obtained building permit order dated 09.12.2024 for construction of ground floor in the subje:ct property. He has constructed the compound wall. The same was demolished on20.02.2025. Petitioner filed the present Contemp,t Case alleging that respondents tried to dispossess the I i 2 petitioner from the subject property and also respondents interfered with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property and tried to interfere with the construction activity being carried out by the petitioner pursuant to building permit order, dated 09 .12.2024.
4. Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that since there is no Tahsildhar of Neredmet, the question of respondent Nos.I and 2 interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property does not arise. In the work commencement letter, dated 09,12.2024, it was specifically mentioned that the proposed construction is situated at Circle No.28, Malkajgiri Village and Mandal, Secunderabad Zone. Thus, the subject property falls under Malkajgiri Mandal, but not Neredmet. Therefore, the petitioner can't file the aforesaid writ petition against Tahsildhar, Neredmet, and the present contempt case against respondent l ft I I I )
J To, GR/PSL Yt Nos.l and 2 alleging wilful and deliberate violation of order datcd 20.1)9.2024 in W.P.No.25889 o12024.
5. In lhe light o1'the saicl discussion, this Clontenlpt Case is closed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contenrpt Case shall stand closed. SD/- N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY// i S TION OFFICER
1. One CC; to SRI VEERA BABU GANDU Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CC)s to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderalrad. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies j
J HIGH CCIURT DATED:115/09/2025
ORDER
GC.No.938 of 2025 GLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE L., 2 I JAil 2U6 z. * t *<ex &.t C