WP/27630/2025 of Narkula Parashuram Vs The State of Telangana on 12 September 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 27630 OF 2o2s

Between:

1. Narkula Parashuram, S/o. Narkula Rajanna, Aged 39 years, Rl,/o. H.No. C- 385, Kanimetta Village, Kothakota Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

2. Narkula Srinivasulu, S/o. Narkula Rajanna, Aged 34 years, Rl/o. H.No. C-385, Kanimetta Village, Kothakota Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

...PETITIONERS

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

The District Collector, Wanaparthy District.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Wanaparthy, Wanaparthy District.

The Tahsildar, Peddamandadi Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

The Mandal Surveyor, O/o. The Tahsildar, Peddamandadi Mandal, wanaparthv District

...RES'.NDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circunistances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 & 5, in not conducting Survey / Sub-Division of the lands admeasuring Ac.0-23 Gts., in Sy.No. 542 & Ac.2-18

Gts. in Sy.No.543, situated at Veltoor Village, Peddamandadi Mandal, Wanaparthy District, inspite of petitioners specific representations dated 05.08.2o25 by enclosing F-Line Petition bearing Application No.DER02250'1210727 , daled 08.02.2025 as highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia.

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in lhe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 4 & 5 to forthwith conduct survey of the lands admeasuring Ac.0- ,

23 Gts., in Sy.No. 542 & Ac.2-18 Gts. in Sy.No.543, sitLr; ted at Veltoor Village Peddamandadi Mandal, bearing Application No.

of the writ petition.

The Court made the following: ORDER

Wanaparthy District, pursuant I the F_Line petition DER02250 1 21 07 27, dated 08.O2 i C2S. pend ing d isposal Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI RAMESH KADARI

counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 5: sRr l. navtruoerl. AGp FoR REVENUE

THE IIONOURABLE SRI JUS'IICE K. LAKSIIMAN

WRIT PETITION No.27630 of 2025

ORAL ORDE,R:

Hearcl learned counsel for the .petititlncrs and Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader For Revenue appcaring for the respondents

2.

The I'ctitioners herein ale claiming that they alc the absolute o\\,'ncrs and possessors of the land admcasuring Ac.0-23 gts ln Sy.No.542 and Ac.2- l8 gts Sy.No.543, situated at Veltoor lll I

Village, Peddamandadi Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Irr pr.oo['ol tlic sanrc, the1,' have tilcd copy ol' latcst passbook arrtl titlc clcccl lhcy have submitted F-Line application bcaring No.DER02250 121072'7, dated 08,02.2025, to respondent No.4, with a request to conduct survey, demarcate the aforesaid land by fixing the boundaries. Despite receiving and acknowledging thc said F-Line application, respondent No.4 did not act upon the Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.4, thc I

I

satre

petitioners have filed the present writ petition.

3.

Whereas, the learned Assistant Government Pleader lbr t \

I(evenue, on instructions, wotrld submit that respondent No.4 u'ilt \

consider thc F-[,ine application submitted by the pr: lioners strictly in accoldancc with law.

1.

In thc light of the said submissions, this \rlit Petition is disposed ,rl. directing rcspondcnt No.4 t() consider the lr-Lirre application lrcirrinq No.DER022501.l 0127, dated 0It.02.202-5. srrbnrittcd by llrc petitroners with a rc(l cst to conduct survey, denrarcate the a(bresaid propcfty by fixing lre boundaries strictly in accortlance with law, by putting the pe i ioncrs and all intelested parties tin notice and affbrding them an r rirortunity. lf, respondent No.4 is not inclincd to accept the requr: t rnude by thc pctitioncrs, hc shall pass a reasoncd order, colnnt tricate copy of the said ordcl to thc petitioners. He shall cor.t I ctc the said exercise within 45 working days lrom the date of lc; :ipt of copy of this ordcr.'l hcr-c shall be no order as to costs.

As a sccluel, misccllaneous petitions pendint iI'any,, strall stand closed "SD/.C. DEEPIKA

,I ISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

1. The Tahsildar, Peddamandadi Mandal, Wanaparthy D s :rict.

2. One CC to SRI RAMESH KADARI, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the St rle of Telangana lourl

4. Two CD Copies

To,

MMT

BS

ru#

\

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1210912025