Telangana High Court
WP/27599/2025 of A. Srisailam Vs The State of Telangana on 12 September 2025
I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 27599 OF 2025 Between: A . Srisailam, S/o A.Krishnaiah, Aged about 46
a
t 3168 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 27599 OF 2025
Between:
A. Srisailam, S/o A.Krishnaiah, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o Jakaram village, Konduru Mandal, Ranga Reddy district.
...PETITIONER
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The District Collector, Ranga Reddy district at Kongarakalan.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Shamshabad Revenue Division, Ranga Reddy district.
The Tahasildar, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
..RESPONDENTS
, Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not mutation /incorporation/restoration of the land extent of Ac. 4-03 gutas in Sy.No. 64 and Sy.No. 65 situated at Palmakole village, Shamshabad Mandal Ranga Reddy district in the name of petitioner, and not issuing e-pattadar pass books, uploading the same in the Bhoobharathi portal is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the Telangana Rights in Land and pattadar pass books Act and violation of Articles 300A of the Constitution of lndia and and consequently direct the respondents to mutate/incorporate/restore the name of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the above stated lands by issuing e-pattadar pass books, uploading the Bhoobharathi portal.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to mutate/incorporate/restore the name of the petitioner
!i
I
t
I
in the revenue records, issue e-pattadar pass boo( by uploading the Bhoobharathi in favour of the petitioner in respect land er.l rnt of Ac. 4-03 gutas in Sy.No.64 and Sy.No. 65 situated at Palmakole village Shamshabad Mandal Ranga Reddy district pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : M/S HARSHEET REDDY LAt r :lRM
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP F() t REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
t
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I( LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.27599 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
2. The Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.3-36 gts in Sy.No.64 and Ac.0-09 gts in Sy.No.65, total land admeasuring Ac.4-05 gts. situated at Palmakole Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Rangareddy District. In proof of the same, he has filed copy of otd pattadar passbook and title deed. He has submitted an application during Bhu-Bharathi Revenue Sadassulu Pilot Project vide application No.05230280041 dated 11.06.2025 to respondent No.3 with a request to issue E-Pattadar passbook by reflecting his name in Bhu-Bharathi portal. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said application, respondent No.3 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.3, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.
3. Whereas, the leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that revenue authorities \
ft have received 8.5 lakh applications during Revenue S: dassulu Pilot Project and it will take some time to segregate an,i consider the same. If, petitioner submit online application to t e competent authority along with all the documents, competent uthority will consider and dispose it of in accordance with law.
4. In the light of the said submissions, this Vr it Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to : ubmit online application to the competent authority in terms of Scir ,dule-A o1' the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) t.r les, 2025 (for short, 'the Rules'), and based on the market value i s specified in Schedule-B of the Rules along with all the documcr rs within one week fiom the date of receipt ofcopy of this ordcr' nd on receipt of the said online application, competent authorill ;hall consider and dispose it of in accordance with law within 30 C rys thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed I D/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI /srii ISTANT REGISTRAR rl'l1'--,_-'-'-- I', { secrtoN oFFrcER
1. The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. Rev€ rue Department, T.S
The District Collector, Ranga Reddy district at Kongara lalan. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Shamshabad Rer..'nue Division, Ranga Reddy district. //TRUE COPY// To,
, _ :'_,iflFir+se-f=**a--,.-
4. The Tahasildar, Shamshabad lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District.
5. One CC to SRl. M/S HARSHEET REDDY LAW FIRM Advocate [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE,High Court for the State of Telangana lourl
7. Two CD Copies D.N BM
HIGH COURT DATED:1210912025
ORDER
WP.No.27599 of 2025 o O 1 / JAll 7U28 t ' ',:c \ S \,i\
I, j; (,1 ../ DISPOSED THE WRIT PETITION WITH()UT COSTS \o dp