Tripura High Court
WP(C)/125/2026 of Smt. Sabitri Banik Laskar Vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND 2 OTHERS on 16 June 2026
2026:THC:743
TRHC010002862026 2026:THC:743 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C)No.125 of 2026 Smt. Sabitri Banik Laskar, W/O Lt. Joy Laskar, Ex. Work Assistant. Presently Residing at:- C/O Shri Sajal Banik, Ramkrishna Palli (Adjacent to T.U. 1st Gate), Suryamaninagar, P.O. & P.S. Amtali, West Tripura,
TRHC010002862026
2026:THC:743
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
WP(C)No.125 of 2026
Smt. Sabitri Banik Laskar,
W/O Lt. Joy Laskar, Ex. Work Assistant.
Presently Residing at:-
C/O Shri Sajal Banik,
Ramkrishna Palli (Adjacent to T.U. 1st Gate), Suryamaninagar, P.O. & P.S. Amtali, West Tripura, PIN:799 130
---Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Tripura (Represented by its Secretary), P.W.D. (R & B), Civil Secretariat, P.O. & P.S. NCC, Agartala, West Tripura: 799 010
2. The Engineer-in-Chief,
Office of the Chief Engineer, PWD (R & B), 7th Block, 3rd Floor, New Secretariat Complex, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN:799 010
3. The Executive Engineer,
Agartala Division No.III, P.W.D. (R & B), Government of Tripura, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN:799 001
----Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Prasanta Kr. Pal, Adv.
Mr. Abhinandan Pal, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Dipankar Sarma, Addl. G.A.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Order
16/06/2026
Learned Counsel for the petitioner is present. Learned Addl. G.A. appears for the State-respondents. It is informed by Learned Addl. G.A. that by this time the offer of appointment has been issued by the respected department in favour of the petitioner by memo dated 12.06.2026. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that, due to six months delay in appointing the petitioner, the petitioner had to suffer some hardships.
Page 1 of 2
TRHC010002862026 2026:THC:743
Learned Addl. G.A. submitted that in a case under Die-in- harness Scheme generally the appointment is issued in the months of January/July. So the delay was not inordinate. This Court also agrees with the submission of the Learned Addl. G.A. appearing for the State-respondents and this Court does not find any reason to proceed with this case for further adjudication. Accordingly this writ petition stands disposed of. For further grievances, if any, the petitioner is at liberty to file separate petition.
JUDGE
Moumita +05'30'
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…